Back
 OJU  Vol.2 No.2 , May 2012
Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Monitoring during TVM Surgery: Safer Procedure Even for Beginners
Abstract: Tension-free vaginal mesh (TVM) surgery is a common and minimally invasive procedure for female pelvic organ prolapse. In 2004, this procedure was developed by a French group, and standardized surgical kits are now commercially available in many countries. Although it is less invasive, one of the shortcomings of this procedure is that it involves a single surgeon groping around with their fingers without any intraoperative monitoring. Therefore, using Intraoperative fluoroscopic monitoring during TVM surgery makes it safer, even for beginners. In this case, we performed TVM for the anterior vaginal wall. First, we used the c-arm of a fluoroscope to insert bilateral ureteral stents. A urethral catheter was then used for both urine drainage and contrast medium injection. In all procedures, we were able use fluoroscopic imaging whenever necessary. We were able to easily confirm the positions of the prolapsed bladder and the bilateral ureteral stents with fluoroscopic imaging, and the ischial spine was easy to locate before the procedure. We were also able to confirm the position of the top of the needle with fluoroscopic imaging whenever necessary. If a surgeon is worried about the risk of bladder injury during TVM surgery, they should inject contrast medium into the bladder at the start of the procedure. Intraoperative fluoroscopic monitoring during TVM surgery is easy and makes the procedure safer, even for beginners. Moreover, fluoroscopic imaging also allows intraoperative training. To avoid exposing the body to excess radiation, we must minimize the total length of the fluoroscopic examination.
Cite this paper: H. Kobayashi, N. Sawada, S. Kira, T. Miyamoto, Y. Haneda, H. Zakoji, T. Tsuchida, I. Araki and M. Takeda, "Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Monitoring during TVM Surgery: Safer Procedure Even for Beginners," Open Journal of Urology, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2012, pp. 72-74. doi: 10.4236/oju.2012.22012.
References

[1]   P. Debodinance, J. Berrocal, H. Clave, et al., “Changing Attitudes on the Surgical Treatment of Urogenital Prolapse: Birth of the Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh,” Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Vol. 33, No. 7, 2004, pp. 577-588. doi:10.1016/S0368-2315(04)96598-2

[2]   M. Boukerrou, E. Lambaudie, P. Collinet, et al., “Objective Analysis of Mechanical Resistance of Tension-Free Devices,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 124, No. 2, 2006, pp. 240-245. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.040

[3]   F. Caquant, P. Collinet, P. Debodinance, et al., “Safety of Trans Vaginal Mesh Procedure: Retrospective Study of 684 Patients,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2008, pp. 449-456. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00820.x

[4]   M. Takeyama, Y. Uesaka, S. Itoh, et al., “Feasibility of the Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Procedure Using Soft Polypropylene Mesh (Gynemesh PS) Japan,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Vol. 18, 2007, pp. 46-47.

[5]   K. Kumiko, S. Shoji, Y. Shigeki, et al., “Clinical Pathway for Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Procedure: Evaluation in 300 Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse,” International Journal of Urology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2009, pp. 314-317. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02249.x

[6]   T. Satoru, O. Daisuke, S. Takahiro, et al., “Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Single-Center Experience of 310 Cases with 1-Year Follow Up,” International Journal of Urology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2010, pp. 353-358. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02469.x

[7]   H. K. Pannu, J. C. Scatarige and J. Eng, “Comparison of Supine Magnetic Resonance Imaging with and without Rectal Contrast to Fluoroscopic Cystocolpoproctography for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009, pp. 125-130. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e318161d739

 
 
Top