ABSTRACT This study applies data from a web-based survey conducted in mainland China to examine the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for seven different product categories awarded with China Environmental Label and com- pare the mean WTP estimates among these categories. The Interval Regression method is used for estimation. The results indicate that Chinese consumers who regard environmental conservation as being more important than life convenience, who believe purchasing the eco-labeled products is good for the environment, and who have the experience in purchasing eco-labeled products are willing to pay more for those products with environmental label or eco-label. In addition, socio-demographic characteristics such as gender, age, education and household income are found to be important factors to affect Chinese consumers’ WTP amounts. Finally, the results of pair-wise comparison among the mean WTP estimates of various eco-labeled products indicate that most of them are different, which implies that the degrees of Chinese consumers’ willingness to pay extra money for China Environmental Label are different based on the types of products.
Cite this paper
J. Shen, "Understanding the Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Eco-Labeled Products: An Empirical Analysis of the China Environmental Label," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, 2012, pp. 87-94. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2012.51011.
 J. Shen and T. Saijo, “Does Energy Efficiency Label Al- ter Consumers’ Purchase Decision? A Latent Class Ap- proach on Shanghai Data,” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 90, No. 11, 2009, pp. 3561-3573.
 I. G. Gallastegui, “The Use of Eco-Labels: A Review of the Literature,” European Environment, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2002, pp. 316-331. doi:10.1002/eet.304
 M. F. Teisl, C. L. Noblet and J. Rubin, “The Design of an Eco-Marketing and Labeling Program for Vehicles,” In: U. Grote, A. K. Basu and N. H. Chau, Eds., New Fron- tiers in Environmental and Social Labeling, Physica- Verlag Press, Heidelberg, 2007.
 A. K. Basu, N. H. Chau and U. Grote, “Eco-Labeling and Stages of Development,” Review of Development Econom- ics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2003, pp. 228-247.
 T. B. Bj?rner, L. G. Hansen and C. R. Russell, “Environ- mental Labeling and Consumers’ Choice—An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of the Nordic Swan,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2004, pp. 411-434. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.002
 T. N. Cason and L. Gangadharan, “Environmental Label- ing and Incomplete Consumer Information in Laboratory Markets,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Man- agement, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2002, pp. 113-134.
 R. J. Johnston, C. R. Wessells, H. Donath and F. Asche, “Measuring Consumer Preferences for Ecolabeled Seafood: An International Comparison,” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2001, pp. 20-39.
 M. L. Loureiro and S. Hine, “Discovering Niche Markets: A Comparison If Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local (Colorado Grown), Organic, and GMO-Free Products,” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2002, pp. 477-487.
 M. L. Loureiro, J. J. McCluskey and R. C. Mittelhammer, “Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco-Labeled Ap- ples?” Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 203-219. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2002.tb00430.x
 W. Moon, W. J. Florkowski, B. Brückner and I. Schonhof, “Willingness to Pay for Environmental Practices: Implica- tions for Eco-Labeling,” Land Economics, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2002, pp. 88-102. doi:10.2307/3146925
 B. Roe, M. F. Teisl, A. Levy and M. Russell, “US Con- sumers’ Willingness to Pay for Green Electricity,” Energy Policy, Vol. 29, No. 11, 2001, pp. 917-925.
 G. Grankvist and A. Biel, “The Importance of Beliefs and Purchase Criteria in the Choice of Eco-Labeled Food Products,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2001, pp. 405-410. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0234
 J. A. Lee and S. J. S. Holden, “Understanding the Deter- minants of Environmentally Conscious Behavior,” Psy- chology and Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1999, pp. 373- 392.
 P. C. Stern, “Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmen- tally Significant Behavior,” Journal of Consumer policy, Vol. 22, 2000, pp. 461-478.
 J. Th?gersen, “Psychological Determinants of Paying Attention to Eco-Labels In Purchase Decisions: Model Development and Multinational Validation,” Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2000, pp. 285-313.
 R. C. Mitchell and R. T. Carson, “Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method,” Re- sources for the Future, Washington D.C., 1989.
 J. M. Wooldridge, “Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data,” The MIT Press, Massachusetts, 2002.
 T. A. Cameron, “The Impact of Grouping Coarseness in Alternative Grouped-Data Regression Models,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1987, pp. 37-57.
 J. Shen and T. Saijo, “Reexamining the Relations be- tween Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Individual Environmental Concern: Evidence from Shanghai Data,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2008, pp. 42-50. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.003
 L. M. Hunter, A. Hatch and A. Johnson, “Cross-National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors,” Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 85, No. 3, 2004, pp. 677-694.
 P. Mohai, “Men, Women and the Environment: An Ex- amination of the Gender Gap in Environmental Concern Activism,” Society and Natural Resources, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1992, pp. 1-19. doi:10.1080/08941929209380772
 M. L. Finucane, P. Slovis, C. K. Mertz, J. Flynn and T. A. Satterfield, “Gender, Race, and Perceived Risk: The ‘White Male’ Effect,” Health, Risk & Society, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2000, pp. 159-172. doi:10.1080/713670162
 J. Flynn, P. Slovic and C. K. Mertz, “Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1994, pp. 1101-1108.
 F. Wilcoxon, “Individual Comparisons by Ranking Meth- ods,” Biometrics, Vol. 1, No. 6, 1945, pp. 80-83.