Back
 SS  Vol.3 No.2 , February 2012
Single-Incision Robotic Surgery
Norihiko Ishikawa*, Masahiko Kawaguchi, Hideki Moriyama, Go Watanabe
Show more
Abstract: Introduction: Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILSTM) has been developed as a less invasive laparoscopic surgery. On the other hand, robotically assisted surgical technology has offered new options for minimally invasive surgery. In this study, we report a new surgical technology to perform SILS using the da Vinci S surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). Materials and Surgical Technique: A porcine liver with gallbladder was placed on an endoscopic surgery trainer, and a 25 mm incision was made for one robotic camera and two instruments at the umbilicus position. Both instruments were crossed while preventing them from colliding with each other, and Robot-assisted single-incision cholecyctectomy was perfumed. Discussion: This technique is expected to contribute to the development of a number of procedures in the future.
Keywords: Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery; Robotic Surgery; Surgical System of da Vinci S
Cite this paper: N. Ishikawa, M. Kawaguchi, H. Moriyama and G. Watanabe, "Single-Incision Robotic Surgery," Surgical Science, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2012, pp. 84-86. doi: 10.4236/ss.2012.32015.
References

[1]   C. Esposito, “One-Trocar Appendectomy in Pediatric Surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1998, pp. 177-178. doi:10.1007/s004649900624

[2]   G. Piskun and S. Rajpal, “Transumbilical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Utilizes No Incisions Outside the Umbilicus,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques A, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1999, pp. 361-364. doi:10.1089/lap.1999.9.361

[3]   J. Himpens, G. Leman and G. B. Cadiere, “Telesurgical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 12, No. 8, 1998, p. 1091. doi:10.1007/s004649900788

[4]   M. Waseda, N. Inaki, L. Mailaender and G. F. Buess, “An Innovative Trainer for Surgical Procedures Using Animal Organs,” Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2005, pp. 262-266. doi:10.1080/13645700500273841

 
 
Top