Inflated Production Quota Gains Paid for by a Consumption Tax
Affiliation(s)
Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona. University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona. University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
ABSTRACT
We consider a production quota buyout that is paid for by a consumption tax. If producers are paid the true value of the quota via a consumption tax, the net producer gain is zero for the combined introduction and removal of quota (even though the quota value is positive) since the net gain to producers when the quota was introduced is equal to the net loss to producers when the production quota is removed. Therefore, the quota value does not measure the producer net gain from both the introduction and removal of the production quota. The quota value merely represents the consumption tax amount. This is also true if producers are paid (which is often the case) an inflated quota value that is more than the true quota value.
We consider a production quota buyout that is paid for by a consumption tax. If producers are paid the true value of the quota via a consumption tax, the net producer gain is zero for the combined introduction and removal of quota (even though the quota value is positive) since the net gain to producers when the quota was introduced is equal to the net loss to producers when the production quota is removed. Therefore, the quota value does not measure the producer net gain from both the introduction and removal of the production quota. The quota value merely represents the consumption tax amount. This is also true if producers are paid (which is often the case) an inflated quota value that is more than the true quota value.
Cite this paper
T. Schmitz, A. Schmitz and D. Haynes, "Inflated Production Quota Gains Paid for by a Consumption Tax," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 67-68. doi: 10.4236/tel.2012.21012.
T. Schmitz, A. Schmitz and D. Haynes, "Inflated Production Quota Gains Paid for by a Consumption Tax," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 67-68. doi: 10.4236/tel.2012.21012.
References
[1] A. Schmitz and T. G. Schmitz, “Benefit-Cost Analysis: Distri-butional Consideration under Production Quota Buyouts,” Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, Article 2. [2] T. G. Schmitz and A. Schmitz, “Compensation and the Twin Producer Gains from Production Quotas,” Theoretical Economic Letters, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011, pp. 70-72. doi:10.4236/tel.2011.13015 [3] R. E. Just, D. L. Hueth and A. Schmitz, “The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation,” Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2004. [4] J. Womach, “Tobacco Quota Buyout,” CRS Report for US Congress, 2005. http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RS22046.pdf
[1] A. Schmitz and T. G. Schmitz, “Benefit-Cost Analysis: Distri-butional Consideration under Production Quota Buyouts,” Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, Article 2. [2] T. G. Schmitz and A. Schmitz, “Compensation and the Twin Producer Gains from Production Quotas,” Theoretical Economic Letters, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011, pp. 70-72. doi:10.4236/tel.2011.13015 [3] R. E. Just, D. L. Hueth and A. Schmitz, “The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation,” Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2004. [4] J. Womach, “Tobacco Quota Buyout,” CRS Report for US Congress, 2005. http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RS22046.pdf