SM  Vol.2 No.1 , January 2012
Breast Implants for Graduation: A Sociological Examination of Daughter and Mother Narratives
The purpose of this research is to examine through sociological theories how young women and their parents make sense of the desire, attainment, and gifting of breast implants for graduation. A qualitative study of 10 high school graduates and their mothers was conducted in the state of Texas, USA, in order to understand why the daughters asked for implants as a graduation gift and why their parents, especially, mothers paid for them. Four theoretical paradigms provided a better understanding of the gifting and receiving of breast implants for graduation: symbolic interaction theory, the social construction of reality, reference group theory, and conspicuous consumption. This study shows that gifting and receiving implants for graduation is primarily motivated by both personal feelings of physical inadequacy and sociocultural representation of beauty.

Cite this paper
Fowler, L. & Moore, A. (2012). Breast Implants for Graduation: A Sociological Examination of Daughter and Mother Narratives. Sociology Mind, 2, 109-115. doi: 10.4236/sm.2012.21014.
[1]   American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Inc. (2004). Top 5 female cosmetic procedures. URL (last checked 30 March 2008)

[2]   Austin, A. (2000). More teens opt for plastic surgery. Christian Science Monitor, 92, 14.

[3]   Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday Dell.

[4]   Beyond B. (2003). “Beyond botox,” Economist, 369, 61-62.

[5]   Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[6]   Bulik, C., & Kendler, K. (2000). I am what I (don’t) eat: Establishing an identity independent of an eating disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1755-1760. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1755

[7]   Carolan, M. (2005). The conspicuous body: Capitalism, consumerism, class and consumption. Worldviews, 9, 82-111. doi:10.1163/1568535053628436

[8]   Chase, S. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment: The work of narratives of women school superintendents. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

[9]   Cooley, C. H. (1964). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

[10]   Davis, K. (2003). Dubious equalities and embodies differences: Cultural studies on cosmetic surgery. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

[11]   Dawson, E., & Chatman, E. (2001). Reference group theory with implications for information studies: A theoretical essay. Information Research, 6, 1-26.

[12]   DeNoon, D. (2003). Latest plastic surgery trends and stats: His/hers, mom/daughter surgery new trend. Web MDHealth Medical News. URL (last checked 17 January 2007)

[13]   Didie, E., & Sarwer, D. (2003). Factors that influence the decision to undergo cosmetic breast augmentation surgery. Journal of Women’s Health, 12, 241-254. doi:10.1089/154099903321667582

[14]   Farrell, J. (2004). More teens see implants as a right. Miami Herald. Retrieved July 10, 2005, from InfoTrac Newspapers database.

[15]   Ferber, A. (2000). A comment on Aguirre: Taking narrative seriously. Sociological Perspectives, 43, 341-349.

[16]   Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

[17]   Harrison, K. (2003). Television viewers’ ideal body proportions: The case of the curvaceously thin woman. Sex Roles, 48, 255-265. doi:10.1023/A:1022825421647

[18]   Hinchman, L., & Hinchman, S. (1997). Introduction. In L. P. Hinchman, & S. K. Hinchman (Eds.), Memory, identity, community: The idea of narrative in the human sciences (pp. 13-30). New York: State University of New York Press.

[19]   Holzgang, J. (2000). Body image project: Facts on body and image. URL (last checked 6 November 2006)

[20]   Hyman, H., & Singer, E. (1968). Readings in reference group theory and research. New York: Macmillan.

[21]   Kelley, R. (2003). Giving the gift of rhinoplasty. Newsweek, 142, 76.

[22]   Kilbourne, J. (1994). Still killing us softly: Advertising and the obsession with thinness. New York: Guilford Press.

[23]   LaVoie, A. (2000). Media influences on teens: Facts compiled by Allison LaVoie. URL (last checked 13 April 2000)

[24]   Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

[25]   McKenzie, J. (2006). New grad gift: Breast implants. Mind & Body, 5, 15-18.

[26]   Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[27]   Mishler, E. (1995). A matter of time: When, since, after Labov and Waletzky. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 69-73.

[28]   Moberg, M., Siskin, J., Stern, B., & Wu, R. (1999). Sara Lee: Wonderbra. URL (last checked 6 July 2005)

[29]   More girls getting implants (2004). The New York Post (pp. 1-8). Retrieved July 19, 2006, from InfoTrac Newspapers database.

[30]   Orbach, S. (1993). Hunger strike: The anorectic’s struggle as a metaphor for our age. London: Penguin.

[31]   Patton, T. (2006). Hey girl, am I more than my hair?: African American women and their struggles with beauty, body image, and hair. NWSA Journal, 18, 24-51. doi:10.2979/NWS.2006.18.2.24

[32]   Rabak-Wagener, J., Eickhoff, S., & Vance, K. (1998). The effect of media analysis on attitudes and behaviors regarding body image among college students. Journal of American College Health, 47, 29-36. doi:10.1080/07448489809595616

[33]   Rauste-von Wright, M. (1989). Body image satisfaction in adolescent girls and boys: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 71-83. doi:10.1007/BF02139247

[34]   Sarwer, D., Magee, L., & Clark, V. (2004). Physical appearance and cosmetic medical treatments: Physiological and socio-cultural influences. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2, 29-39. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2130.2003.00003.x

[35]   Schor, J. (1998). Keeping up with the Trumps: How the middle class identifies with the rich—excerpt from “The overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer. URL (last checked 9 September 2005)

[36]   Shrum, L., Burroughs, J., & Rindfleisch, A. (2005). Television’s cultivation of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 473-479. doi:10.1086/497559

[37]   Sile, V. (1981). Body and social constructionism: Formation of individuality in the process of socialization. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Vilnius: Vilnius State University.

[38]   Synnott, A. (1989). Truth and goodness, mirrors and masks—Part I: A sociology of beauty and the face. British Journal of Sociology, 40, 607-637. doi:10.2307/590891

[39]   Thomas, W. I. (1923). The unadjusted girl. Boston: Little Brown.

[40]   Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. London: Allen & Unwin.

[41]   Weitz, R. (1999). The politics of women’s bodies: Sexuality, appearance, and behavior. Teaching Sociology, 27, 429-431. doi:10.2307/1319054

[42]   West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125-151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002

[43]   Why are parents buying their girls the gift of surgery? (2005). [News broadcast transcript]. In 20/20 (Producer), ABC news. New York: ABC. URL (last checked 27 December 2011)

[44]   Zukin, S., & Maguire, J. (2004). Consumers and consumption. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 173-197. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110553