Back
 JIS  Vol.3 No.1 , January 2012
A Multi-Stage Network Anomaly Detection Method for Improving Efficiency and Accuracy
Abstract: Because of an explosive growth of the intrusions, necessity of anomaly-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) which are capable of detecting novel attacks, is increasing. Among those systems, flow-based detection systems which use a series of packets exchanged between two terminals as a unit of observation, have an advantage of being able to detect anomaly which is included in only some specific sessions. However, in large-scale networks where a large number of communications takes place, analyzing every flow is not practical. On the other hand, a timeslot-based detection systems need not to prepare a number of buffers although it is difficult to specify anomaly communications. In this paper, we propose a multi-stage anomaly detection system which is combination of timeslot-based and flow-based detectors. The proposed system can reduce the number of flows which need to be subjected to flow-based analysis but yet exhibits high detection accuracy. Through experiments using data set, we present the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Cite this paper: Y. Waizumi, H. Tsunoda, M. Tsuji and Y. Nemoto, "A Multi-Stage Network Anomaly Detection Method for Improving Efficiency and Accuracy," Journal of Information Security, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2012, pp. 18-24. doi: 10.4236/jis.2012.31003.
References

[1]   M. Roesch, “Snort-Lightweight Intrusion Detection for Networks,” LISA’99 Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Conference on System Administration, USENIX Association, Berkeley, 7-12 November 1999.

[2]   D. Anderson, T. F. Lunt, H. Javits, A. Tamaru and A. Baldes, “Detecting Unusual Program Behavior Using the Statistical Component of the Nextgeneration Intrusion Detection Expert System (NIDES),” Computer Science Laboratory SRI-CSL 95-06, May 1995.

[3]   R. Sekar, M. Bendre, D. Dhurjati and P. Bollineni, “A Fast Automaton-Based Method for Detecting Anomalous Program Behaviors,” Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, 2001.

[4]   Y. Sato, Y. Waizumi and Y. Nemoto, “Improving Accuracy of Network-Based Anomaly Detection Using Multiple Detection Modules,” Proceedings of IEICE Technical Report, NS2004-144, 2004, pp. 45-48.

[5]   P. Barford, J. Kline, D. Plonka and A. Ron, “A Signal Analysis of Network Traffic Anomalies,” Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop (IMW) 2002, Marseille, November 2002, pp. 71-82. doi:10.1145/637201.637210

[6]   T. Oikawa, Y. Waizumi, K. Ohta, N. Kato and Y. Nemoto, “Network Anomaly Detection Using Statistical Clustering Method,” Proceedings of IEICE Technical Report, NS2002-143, IN2002-87, CS2002-98, Oct, 2002 pp. 83-88.

[7]   Y. Waizumi, D. Kudo, N.Kato and Y. Nemoto, “A New Network Anomaly Detection Technique Based on Per-Flow and Per-Service Statistics,” Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, Xi’an, 15-19 December 2005, pp. 252-259.

[8]   A. Lakhina, M. Crovella and C. Diot, “Characterization of Network-Wide Anomalies in Traffic Flows,” Proceedings of the ACM/SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, Taormina, 25-27 October 2004, pp. 201-206.

[9]   “DARPA Intrusion Detection Evaluation,” MIT Lincoln Labortory, Lincoln, 2011. http://www.ll.mit.edu/IST/ideval/index.html.

[10]   Inmon Corporation, “Flow Accuracy and Billing,” 2011. http:// www.inmon.com/pdf/sFlowBillilng.pdf.

[11]   N. Duffield, C. Lund and M. Thorup, “Properties and Prediction of Flow Statistics from Sampled Packet Streams,” Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop (IMW), Marseille, 6-8 November 2002. doi:10.1145/637201.637225

[12]   N. Duffield, C. Lund and M. Thorup, “Flow Sampling under Hard Resource Constraints,” Proceedings of ACM SIGMETRICS, New York, 10-14 June 2004.

[13]   “NeFlow,” 2011. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/nmp/netflow/index.shtml.

[14]   P. Akritidis, K. Anagnostakis and E. P. Markatos, “Efficient Content-Based Detection of Zero-Day Worms,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (ICC 2005), Seoul, 16-20 May 2005.

[15]   R. Lippmann, J. W. Haines, D. J. Fried, J. Korba and K. Das, “The 1999 DARPA Off-Line Intrusion Detection Evaluation,” Computer Networks, Vol. 34,No. 4, 2000, pp. 579- 595. doi:10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00139-0

[16]   P. Neumann and P. Porras, “Experience with EMERALD to DATE,” Proceedings of 1st USENIX Workshop on Intrusion Detection and Network Monitoring, Santa Clara, 9-12 April 1999, pp. 73-80.

[17]   G. Vigna, S. T. Eckmann and R. A. Kemmerer, “The STAT Tool Suite,” Proceedings of the 2000 DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX), Hilton Head, 25-27 January 2000.

[18]   S. Jajodia, D. Barbara, B. Speegle and N. Wu, “Audit Data Analysis and Mining (ADAM),” 2000 http://www.isse.gmu.edu/dbarbara/adam.html

[19]   M. Tyson, P. Berry, N. Willams, D. Moran, D. Blei, “DERBI: Diagnosis, Explanation and Recovery from computer Break-Ins,” 2000.

[20]   M. Mahoney, “Network Traffic Anomaly Detection Based on Packet Bytes,” Proceedings of ACM-SAC, Melbourne, 9-12 March 2003, pp. 346-350.

 
 
Top