JHRSS  Vol.10 No.1 , March 2022
Team and Group Dynamics in Organizations: Effect on Productivity and Performance
Abstract: This paper looked at the team and group dynamics in organization and the effect of these dynamics on the productivity and performance of employees within an organization. The paper examined how the different factors influence the behaviour of employees within ActionAid Nigeria, the values of the organization and how it shapes the behaviour of employees, the external factors that can influence the individual behaviour in a group, the role of leadership in shaping organizational behaviour and how the various dynamics influence productivity and performance of employees and the organization. The paper seeks to understand the factors influencing employee behaviour and how that can affect productivity and performance of employees. The paper also established that employee well-being can affect productivity and performance if the values of the organization are not adequately communicated especially to the new members of the organization with diverse temperaments, culture, status, and religious beliefs. The work also revealed that leadership behaviour and personality can shape organizational behaviour which could influence performance positively or negatively in the organization.
Cite this paper: Oyefusi, F. (2022) Team and Group Dynamics in Organizations: Effect on Productivity and Performance. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 10, 111-122. doi: 10.4236/jhrss.2022.101008.

[1]   Burns, M. E., Houser, M. L., & Farris, K. L. (2018). Theory of Planned Behaviour in the Classroom: An Examination of the Instructor Confirmation-Interaction Model. Higher Education, 75, 1091-1108.

[2]   Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded Theory Research: A Design Framework for Novice Researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 7.

[3]   Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. (2012). Management Research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[4]   Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (2011). Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.

[5]   Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2013). Coaching, Mentoring and Organizational Consultancy: Supervision, Skills and Development (2nd ed.). Open University Press.

[6]   Heeter, C. (2015). Get Wild* At Work! (Cover Story). Leadership Excellence, 32, 8.

[7]   Holm, E. (2013). Planting the Seeds of Diversity. JOM, 65, 807.

[8]   Hugenberg, K., & Sacco, D. F. (2008). Social Categorization and Stereotyping: How Social Categorization Biases Person Perception and Face Memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1052-1072.

[9]   Im, T., & Kang, M. (2019). Structural Relationships of Factors Which Impact on Learner Achievement in Online Learning Environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20, 111-124.

[10]   Linden Van der, S., & McKenney, S. (2020). Uniting Epistemological Perspectives to Support Contextualized Knowledge Development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 703-727.

[11]   Mackey, J. D., Brees, J. R., McAllister, C. P., Zorn, M. L., Martinko, M. J., & Harvey, P. (2018). Victim and Culprit? The Effects of Entitlement and Felt Accountability on Perceptions of Abusive Supervision and Perpetration of Workplace Bullying. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 659-673.

[12]   McDonald, S. P. (2013). Empirically Based Leadership: Integrating the Science of Psychology in Building a Better Leadership Model. Military Review, 93, 2-10.

[13]   Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and Practice (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

[14]   NZIM Mentoring Expands (2012). Focus on Management. New Zealand Management, 59, 50.

[15]   Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The Knowledge Creation Metaphor—An Emergent Epistemological Approach to Learning. Science & Education, 14, 535-557.

[16]   Peralta, C. F., Saldanha, M. F., Lopes, P. N., Lourenco, P. R., & Pais, L. (2021). Does Supervisor’s Moral Courage to Go beyond Compliance Have a Role in the Relationships between Teamwork Quality, Team Creativity, and Team Idea Implementation? Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 677-696.

[17]   Raza, S. A., & Sikandar, A. (2018). Impact of Leadership Style of Teacher on the Performance of Students: An Application of Hersey and Blanchard Situational Model. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40, 73-94.

[18]   Richardson, M. (2018). Stepping Up: Applying Situational Leadership Concepts to Public Library Work with Teens. OLA Quarterly, 24, 15-18.

[19]   Sherman, B. J., Bateman, K. M., Jeong, S., & Hudock, L. A. (2021). Dialogic Meta-Ethnography: Troubling Methodology in Ethnographically informed Qualitative Inquiry. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16, 279-302.

[20]   Tangen, S. (2005). Demystifying Productivity and Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54, 34-46.

[21]   Tarricone, P., & Luca, J. (2002). Successful Teamwork: A Case Study.

[22]   Thomas, J. C. (2018). Organizational Dynamics within a Team—Roles, Engagement, and Expectations. Supervision, 79, 9-12.

[23]   Vadi, M., & Vedina, R. (2007). Changes around and within Organisations: Manifestations and Consequences. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11, 91-105.

[24]   Wang, T., Long, L., Zhang, Y., & He, W. (2019). A Social Exchange Perspective of Employee-Organization Relationships and Employee Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviour: The Moderating Role of Individual Moral Identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 473-489.

[25]   Wang, Y. (2018). An Overview on the Team Interaction Process. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 1-11.

[26]   Woehr, D., Arciniega, L., & Poling, T. (2013). Exploring the Effects of Value Diversity on Team Effectiveness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 107-121.

[27]   Wright, K., Franks, A., Kuo, L.-J., McTigue, E., & Serrano, J. (2016). Both Theory and Practice: Science Literacy Instruction and Theories of Reading. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1275-1292.