Back
 AS  Vol.12 No.12 , December 2021
Assessing the Effect of Irrigation Water Management Strategies on Napier Productivity—A Review
Abstract: Napier, a fast growing and perennial grass has a dry matter (DM) yield potential of 78 tons/ha/yr. However, under water availability constraints Napier’s yield potential reduces to 62 tons/ha/yr. In an effort to attain Napier’s yield potential, irrigation management strategies have been integrated into its production to provide the highest productivity. This review assesses the effect of irrigation water management strategies on Napier productivity and also looks at future perspectives. Application of these strategies i.e., precision irrigation, deficit irrigation, and application of biophysical models, can increase Napier’s yield potential to 112 tons/ha/yr. Review findings revealed that there is a need to close the knowledge gap on response of Napier productivity to different irrigation water management strategies. The future perspective explores the potential of the FAO AquaCrop model in provision of pre-season decision-making on irrigation strategies due to its relatively low cost and simplifications required in parameterization.
Cite this paper: Ntege, I. , Kiggundu, N. , Wanyama, J. and Nakawuka, P. (2021) Assessing the Effect of Irrigation Water Management Strategies on Napier Productivity—A Review. Agricultural Sciences, 12, 1447-1461. doi: 10.4236/as.2021.1212092.
References

[1]   Kabirizi, J., Muyekho, F., Mulaa, M. and Pallangyo, B. (2015) Napier Grass Feed Resource: Production, Constraints and Implications for Smallholder Farmers in East and Central Production, Constraints and Farmers in Eastern and Central.

[2]   Marais, D., et al. (2002) Water Use and Water Use Efficiency of Fodder Crops under Irrigation: Part 1 Annual Subtropical Crops.

[3]   Creemers, J. and Aranguiz, A. (2019) Quick Scan of Uganda’s Forage Sub-Sector.

[4]   Jha, A.K., Malla, R., Sharma, M., Panthi, J., Lakhankar, T., Krakauer, N.Y., Shrestha, M.L., et al. (2016) Impact of Irrigation Method on Water Use Efficiency and Productivity of Fodder Crops in Nepal. Climate, 4, 4.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli4010004

[5]   Singh, J.B., Agrawal, R.K. and Behari, P. (2004) Water Use Efficiency and Evapotranspiration of Hybrid Napier (Pennisetum purpureum x P. americanum) under Semi-Arid Indian Region. Indian Journal of Range Management, 17-18.

[6]   Epule, T.E., Ford, J.D., Lwasa, S., Nabaasa, B. and Buyinza, A. (2018) The Determinants of Crop Yields in Uganda: What Is the Role of Climatic and Non-Climatic Factors? Agriculture and Food Security, 7, Article No. 10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0159-3

[7]   Negawo, A.T., Teshome, A., Kumar, A., Hanson, J. and Jones, C.S. (2017) Opportunities for Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Improvement Using Molecular Genetics. Agronomy, 7, Article No. 28.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7020028

[8]   Buyinza, J., Sekatuba, J., Ongodia, G., Eryau, K., Nansereko, S., Opolot, I.V., Agaba, H., et al. (2015) Farmers’ Knowledge on Forage Production in Smallholder Dairy Systems of Uganda. International Journal of Livestock Production Research, 3, 1-10.

[9]   Rengsirikul, K., Ishii, Y., Kangvansaichol, K., Sripichitt, P., Punsuvon, V., Vaithanomsat, P. and Tudsri, S. (2013) Biomass Yield, Chemical Composition and Potential Ethanol Yields of 8 Cultivars of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.) Harvested 3-Monthly in Central Thailand. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, 3, 107-112.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2013.32015

[10]   Orodho, A.B. (2006) The Role and Importance of Napier Grass in the Smallholder Dairy Industry in Kenya. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Newpub/napier/napier_kenya.htm%0Ahttp://www.fao.org/ag/agp/agpc
/doc/newpub/napier/napier_kenya.htm


[11]   Akah, N.P. and Onweluzo, J.C. (2014) Evaluation of Water-Soluble Vitamins and Optimum Cooking Time of Fresh Edible Portions of Elephant Grass (Pennisetum purpureum L. Schumach) Shoot. Nigerian Food Journal, 32, 120-127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0189-7241(15)30127-2

[12]   Kabirizi, J., Ziiwa, E., Mugerwa, S., Ndikumana, J. and Nanyennya, W. (2013) Dry Season Forages for Improving Dairy Production in Smallholder Systems in Uganda. Tropical Grasslands Forrajes Tropicales, 1, 212-214.
https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(1)212-214

[13]   Keba, H.T., Madakadze, I.C., Angassa, A. and Hassen, A. (2013) Nutritive Value of Grasses in Semi-Arid Rangelands of Ethiopia: Local Experience Based Herbage Preference Evaluation versus Laboratory Analysis. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26, 366-377.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12551

[14]   Okwori, A.I. and Magani, I.E. (2010) Influence of Nitrogen Sources and Cutting Interval on the Digestility of Four (4) Grass Species in the Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 1, 526-533.
http://scihub.org/ABJNA/PDF/2010/4/1-4-526-533.pdf

[15]   Wangchuk, K., Rai, K., Nirola, H., Thukten, Dendup, C. and Mongar, D. (2015) Forage Growth, Yield and Quality Responses of Napier Hybrid Grass Cultivars to Three Cutting Intervals in the Himalayan Foothills. Tropical Grasslands Forrajes Tropicales, 3, 142-150.
https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(3)142-150

[16]   Amin, R., Ram, N., Yousuf, S., Hashem, A. and Khatun, M. (2016) Study on Cutting Intervals on Biomass Yield, Nutritive Value and Their Oxalate Content of Different High Yielding Napier (P. purpureum) Cultivars. Bioscience and Biotechnology, 1, 100-107.

[17]   Sarker, N.R., Habib, M.A., Yeasmin, D., Tabassum, F. and Mohammed, R.A. (2021) Studies on Biomass Yield, Morphological Characteristics and Nutritive Quality of Napier Cultivars under Two Different Geo-Topographic Conditions of Bangladesh. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 12, 914-925.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2021.126061

[18]   Kebede, G., Feyissa, F., Assefa, G., Alemayehu, M., Mengistu, A., Kehaliew, A., Abera, M., et al. (2016) Chemical Composition and In-Vitro Organic Matter Digestibility of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) Accessions in the Mid and Highland Areas of Ethiopia. International Journal of Livestock Research, 6, 41.
https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20160317124016

[19]   Maria, L.F.O., Rogrio, F.D., de Geraldo, A.G., da Vernica, B.S., Erina, V.R., Aldo, S., dos Avelino, S.R., et al. (2014) Pre-Breeding of Elephant Grass for Energy Purposes and Biomass Analysis in Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ, Brazil. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 9, 2743-2758.
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.8900

[20]   Singh, B.P., Singh, H.P. and Obeng, E. (2013) 13 Elephantgrass. In: Singh, B.P., Ed., Biofuel Crops: Production, Physiology and Genetics, CABI, Georgia, USA, 271-291.

[21]   Norsuwan, T., Marohn, C. and Jintrawet, A. (2014) Effects of Irrigation Treatments and Nitrogen Applications on Napier Grass Planted in Dry Season as Energy Crop at Chiang Mai Province. Khon Kaen Agricultural Journal, 42, 1-7.

[22]   Moore, G., Sanford, P. and Wiley, T. (2006) Perennial Pastures for Western Australia. 248.

[23]   FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2019) The Future of Livestock in Uganda. Opportunities and Challenges in the Face of Uncertainty. Rome.

[24]   Mwendia, S.W., Yunusa, I.A.M., Sindel, B.M., Whalley, R.D.B. and Kariuki, I.W. (2017) Assessment of Napier Grass Accessions in Lowland and Highland Tropical Environments of East Africa: Water Stress Indices, Water Use and Water Use Efficiency. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 97, 1953-1961.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8004

[25]   Turinawe, A., Mugisha, J. and Kabirizibi, J. (2011) Socio-Economic Evaluation of Improved Forage Technologies in Smallholder Dairy Cattle Farming Systems in Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4, 163-174.
https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n3p163

[26]   Cheruiyot, D., Midega, C.A.O., Pittchar, J.O., Pickett, J.A. and Khan, Z.R. (2020) Farmers’ Perception and Evaluation of Brachiaria Grass (Brachiaria spp.) Genotypes for Smallholder Cereal-Livestock Production in East Africa. Agriculture (Switzerland), 10, 268.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070268

[27]   Thaiana Rueda da Silva, C., Bonfim-Silva, E.M., de Araújo da Silva, T.J., Alves Rodrigues Pinheiro, E., Vieira José, J. and Pereira Freire Ferraz, A. (2020) Yield Component Responses of the Brachiaria brizantha Forage Grass to Soil Water Availability in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agriculture, 10, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10010013

[28]   Purbajanti, E.D., Anwar, S. and Kusmiyati, F. (2012) Drought Stress Effect on Morphology Characters, Water Use Efficiency, Growth and Yield of Guinea and Napier Grasses. International Research Journal of Plant Science, 3, 47-53.

[29]   Vennila, C. and Ananthi, T. (2019) Impact of Irrigation and Nutrients on the Performance of Bajra Napier Hybrid Grass Grown under Light Sandy Soil. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8, 804-812.
https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.097

[30]   Getiso, A. and Mijena, D. (2021) Performance Evaluation of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) Accessions under Rain Fed and Irrigation System at Wondo Genet. Global Journal of Ecology, 6, 28-33.

[31]   Fereres, E. and Soriano, M.A. (2007) Deficit Irrigation for Reducing Agricultural Water Use. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 147-159.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl165

[32]   Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Raes, D. and Fereres, E. (2009) Aquacrop—The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles. Agronomy Journal, 101, 426-437.
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0139s

[33]   Doorenbos and Kassam (1979) Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Rome.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-025675-7.50021-2

[34]   Leakey, A.D.B., Ferguson, J.N., Pignon, C.P., Wu, A., Jin, Z., Hammer, G.L. and Lobell, D.B. (2019) Water Use Efficiency as a Constraint and Target for Improving the Resilience and Productivity of C 3 and C 4 Crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 70, 781-808.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040305

[35]   Annandale, J.G., Stirzaker, R.J., Singels, A., van der Laan, M. and Laker, M.C. (2011) Irrigation Scheduling Research: South African Experiences and Future Prospects. Water SA, 37, 751-764.
https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v37i5.12

[36]   Li, F., Yu, D. and Zhao, Y. (2019) Irrigation Scheduling Optimization for Cotton Based on the AquaCrop Model. Water Resources Management, 33, 39-55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2087-1

[37]   Kiggundu, N. and Migliaccio, K.W. (2012) Water Savings, Nutrient Leaching, and Fruit Yield in a Young Avocado Orchard as Affected by Irrigation and Nutrient Management. Irrigation Science, 30, 275-286.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0280-6

[38]   Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., et al. (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Agronomy, 10, 269-280.

[39]   Nakawuka, P., Peters, T.R. and Gallardo, K.R. (2014) Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Yield, Quality, and Costs of the Production of Native Spearmint. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 140, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000719

[40]   Geerts, S., Raes, D. and Garcia, M. (2010) Using AquaCrop to Derive Deficit Irrigation Schedules. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 213-216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.003

[41]   Irmak, S., DeLyann, R.H., Anderson, B.E., Kranz, L.W., et al. (2007) Irrigation Management and Crop Characteristics of Alfalfa. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Vol. 1, 196-201.

[42]   Rogers, M.J., Lawson, A. and Kelly, K. (2017) Forage Options for Dairy Farms with Reduced Water Availability in the Southern Murray Darling Basin of Australia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9, 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122369

[43]   Antoniel, L.S., do Prado, G., Tinos, A.C., Beltrame, G.A., de Almeida, J.V.C. and Cuco, G.P. (2016) Pasture Production under Different Irrigation Depths. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, 20, 539-544.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n6p539-544

[44]   Frenken, K. and Gillet, V. (2012) Irrigation Water Requirement and Water Withdrawal by Country. AQUASTAT Report, 13.

[45]   Tian, Y., Liu, Y. and Jin, J. (2017) Effect of Irrigation Schemes on Forage Yield, Water Use Efficiency, and Nutrients in Artificial Grassland under Arid Conditions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9, 57-66.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112035

[46]   Neal, J.S., Fulkerson, W.J. and Sutton, B.G. (2011) Differences in Water-Use Efficiency among Perennial Forages Used by the Dairy Industry under Optimum and Deficit Irrigation. Irrigation Science, 29, 213-232.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0229-1

[47]   Dirwai, T.L., Senzanje, A. and Mabhaudhi, T. (2021) Calibration and Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop Model for Canola (Brassica napus) under Varied Moistube Irrigation Regimes. Agriculture, 11, 410.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050410

[48]   Sebata, A. (2018) An Insight into Current and Future Production of Forage Crops in Zimbabwe. In: New Perspectives in Forage Crops, InTechOpen, London, 89-104.
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71997

[49]   Alaya, I., Masmoudi, M.M., Jacob, F. and Ben Mechlia, N. (2019) Up-Scaling of Crop Productivity Estimations Using the AquaCrop Model and GIS-Based Operations. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12, Article No. 419.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4588-5

[50]   Maniruzzaman, M., Talukder, M.S.U., Khan, M.H., Biswas, J.C. and Nemes, A. (2015) Validation of the AquaCrop Model for Irrigated Rice Production under Varied Water Regimes in Bangladesh. Agricultural Water Management, 159, 331-340.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.06.022

[51]   Sandhu, S.S., Mahal, S.S. and Kaur, P. (2015) Calibration, Validation and Application of AquaCrop Model in Irrigation Scheduling for Rice under Northwest India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7, 691-699.
https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i2.668

[52]   Greaves, G.E. and Wang, Y.M. (2016) Assessment of FAO Aquacrop Model for Simulating Maize Growth and Productivity under Deficit Irrigation in a Tropical Environment. Water (Switzerland), 8, 557.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w8120557

[53]   Mibulo, T. and Kiggundu, N. (2018) Evaluation of FAO AquaCrop Model for Simulating Rainfed Maize Growth and Yields in Uganda. Agronomy, 8, 238.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8110238

[54]   Pawar, G.S., Kale, M.U. and Lokhande, J.N. (2017) Response of AquaCrop Model to Different Irrigation Schedules for Irrigated Cabbage. Agricultural Research, 6, 73-81.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-016-0238-2

[55]   Araya, A., Habtu, S., Hadgu, K.M., Kebede, A. and Dejene, T. (2010) Test of AquaCrop Model in Simulating Biomass and Yield of Water Deficient and Irrigated Barley (Hordeum vulgare). Agricultural Water Management, 97, 1838-1846.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.06.021

[56]   Karunaratne, A.S., Azam-Ali, S.N., Izzi, G. and Steduto, P. (2011) Calibration and Validation of FAO-Aquacrop Model for Irrigated and Water Deficient Bambara Groundnut. Experimental Agriculture, 47, 509-527.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479711000111

[57]   Mansour, H.A., Gaballah, M.S. and Nofal, O.A. (2020) Evaluating the Water Productivity by Aquacrop Model of Wheat under Irrigation Systems and Algae. Open Agriculture, 5, 262-270.
https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2020-0029

[58]   Jin, X.L., Feng, H.K., Zhu, X.K., Li, Z.H., Song, S.N., Song, X.Y., Guo, W.S., et al. (2014) Assessment of the AquaCrop Model for Use in Simulation of Irrigated Winter Wheat Canopy Cover, Biomass, and Grain Yield in the North China Plain. PLoS ONE, 9, e86938.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086938

[59]   Silvestro, P.C., Pignatti, S., Yang, H., Yang, G., Pascucci, S., Castaldi, F. and Casa, R. (2017) Sensitivity Analysis of the Aquacrop and SAFYE Crop Models for the Assessment of Water Limited Winter Wheat Yield in Regional Scale Applications. PLoS ONE, 12, e0187485.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187485

[60]   Mwiya, R.M., Zhang, Z., Zheng, C. and Wang, C. (2020) Comparison of Approaches for Irrigation Scheduling Using AquaCrop and NSGA-III Models under Climate Uncertainty. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12, 7694.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187694

 
 
Top