AS  Vol.12 No.12 , December 2021
Cannabis sativa L. Response to Narrow Bandwidth UV and the Combination of Blue and Red Light during the Final Stages of Flowering on Leaf Level Gas-Exchange Parameters, Secondary Metabolite Production, and Yield
Abstract: Many modifications to growing environments and specific stress induction techniques exist which are supported by preliminary research to increase yield and/or concentration of secondary metabolites in Cannabis sativa L. One such technique is the modification of the spectral composition of light late in flowering-stage development. In this study, we evaluated the hypothesis that the addition of narrow bandwidth UV-A light and the combination of narrow bandwidth blue and red light, during the final two weeks of the flowering cycle affect the concentration of cannabinoids and terpenes, with no difference in harvest dry weight. Three treatments were used in this experimental design, 1) control-full spectrum illumination, 2) UV-A (~390 nm) at ~66 PPFD in addition to control lighting, and 3) blue (~450 nm) and red (~660 nm) at ~158 PPFD in addition to control lighting. Light treatments were initiated during the final two weeks of flowering to assess secondary metabolite concentration (cannabinoids and terpenes) and yield of three cannabis cultivars (Type I (Larry OG), Type II (Pootie Tang), and Type III (Super White)). With two of the three cultivars used in this study responding with enhanced production of THC our results support the potential beneficial effects of attributed light-mediated treatments on cannabinoid production. On the other hand, our results show contrasting trends for terpene production and yield of dry weight flower.
Cite this paper: Jenkins, M. (2021) Cannabis sativa L. Response to Narrow Bandwidth UV and the Combination of Blue and Red Light during the Final Stages of Flowering on Leaf Level Gas-Exchange Parameters, Secondary Metabolite Production, and Yield. Agricultural Sciences, 12, 1414-1432. doi: 10.4236/as.2021.1212090.

[1]   Mahlberg, P.G. and Hemphill, J.K. (1983) Effect of Light Quality on Cannabinoid Content of Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae). Botanical Gazette, 144, 43-48.

[2]   Livingston, S.J., Quilichini, T.D., Booth, J.K., Wong, D.C.J., Rensing, K.H., Laflamme-Yonkman, J., Castellarin, S.D., Bohlmann, J., Page, J.E. and Samuels, A.L. (2020) Cannabis Glandular Trichomes Alter Morphology and Metabolite Content during Flower Maturation. Plant Journal, 101, 37-56.

[3]   Hanuš, L.O. and Hod, Y. (2020) Terpenes/Terpenoids in Cannabis: Are They Important? Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids, 3, 25-60.

[4]   Sommano, S.R., Chittasupho, C., Ruksiriwanich, W. and Jantrawut, P. (2020) The Cannabis Terpenes. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 25, 5792.

[5]   Russo, E.B. (2011) Taming THC: Potential Cannabis Synergy and Phytocannabinoid-Terpenoid Entourage Effects Linked Articles. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163, 1344-1364.

[6]   Bazzaz, F.A., Dusek, D., Seigler, D.S. and Haney, A.W. (1975) Photosynthesis and Cannabinoid Content of Temperate and Tropical Populations of Cannabis Sativa. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 3, 15-18.

[7]   Tang, K., Struik, P.C., Amaducci, S., Jan Stomph, T. and Yin, X.Y. (2017) Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Leaf Photosynthesis in Relation to Nitrogen Content and Temperature: Implications for Hemp as a Bio-Economically Sustainable Crop. GCB Bioenergy, 9, 1573-1587.

[8]   Vanhove, W., van Damme, P. and Meert, N. (2011) Factors Determining Yield and Quality of Illicit Indoor Cannabis (Cannabis Spp.) Production. Forensic Science International, 212, 158-163.

[9]   Potter, D.J. and Duncombe, P. (2012) The Effect of Electrical Lighting Power and Irradiance on Indoor-Grown Cannabis Potency and Yield. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57, 618-622.

[10]   Magagnini, G., Grassi, G. and Kotiranta, S. (2018) The Effect of Light Spectrum on the Morphology and Cannabinoid Content of Cannabis sativa L. Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids, 1, 19-27.

[11]   Backer, R., Schwinghamer, T., Rosenbaum, P., McCarty, V., et al. (2019) Closing the Yield Gap for Cannabis: A Meta-Analysis of Factors Determining Cannabis Yield. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 495.

[12]   Eichhorn Bilodeau, S., Wu, B., Rufyikiri, A.S., MacPherson, S. and Lefsrud, M. (2019) An Update on Plant Photobiology and Implications for Cannabis Production. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 296.

[13]   Morrison, V.R., Llewellyn, D. and Zheng, Y.B. (2021) Cannabis Yield, Potency, and Leaf Photosynthesis Respond Differently to 1 Increasing Light Levels in an Indoor Environment. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, Article ID: 646020.

[14]   Lalge, A., Cerny, P., Trojan, V. and Vyhnanek, T. (2017) The Effects of Red, Blue and White Light on the Growth and Development of Cannabis sativa L. Proceedings of 24th International PhD Students Conference, Brno, 8-9 November 2017, Volume 24, 646.

[15]   Hawley, D., Graham, T., Stasiak, M. and Dixon, M. (2018) Improving Cannabis Bud Quality and Yield with Subcanopy Lighting. HortScience, 53, 1593-1599.

[16]   Lydon, J., Teramura, A.H. and Coffman, C.B. (1987) UV-B Radiation Effects on Photosynthesis, Growth and Cannabinoid Production of Two Cannabis sativa Chemotypes. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 46, 201-206.

[17]   Chandra, S., Lata, H., Khan, I.A. and Elsohly, M.A. (2008) Photosynthetic Response of Cannabis sativa Photosynthetic Response of Cannabis sativa L. to Variations in Photosynthetic Photon Flux Densities, Temperature and CO2 Conditions. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 14, 299-306.

[18]   Namdar, D., Charuvi, D., Ajjampura, V., Mazuz, M., Ion, A., Kamara, I. and Koltai, H. (2019) LED Lighting Affects the Composition and Biological Activity of Cannabis sativa Secondary Metabolites. Industrial Crops and Products, 132, 177-185.

[19]   Takahashi, S. and Badger, M.R. (2011) Photoprotection in Plants: A New Light on Photosystem II Damage. Trends in Plant Science, 16, 53-60.

[20]   Darko, E., Heydarizadeh, P., Schoefs, B. and Sabzalian, M.R. (2014) Photosynthesis under Artificial Light: The Shift in Primary and Secondary Metabolism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, Article ID: 20130243.

[21]   Jenkins, M.W. and Livesay, C.B. (2021) Photosynthetic Performance and Potency of Cannabis sativa L. Grown under LED and HPS Illumination. Agricultural Sciences, 12, 293-304.

[22]   Long, S.P., Rogers, A., Allen, D.J., Davey, P.A., Morgan, P.B., Ainsworth, E.A., Bernacchi, C.J., et al. (2004) Leaf Photosynthesis and Carbohydrate Dynamics of Soybeans Grown throughout Their Life-Cycle under Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27, 449-458.

[23]   Toonen, M., Ribot, S. and Thissen, J. (2006) Yield of Illicit Indoor Cannabis Cultivation in the Netherlands. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51, 1050-1054.

[24]   Kitazaki, K., Fukushima, A., Nakabayashi, R., Okazaki, Y., Kobayashi, M., Mori, T., Nishizawa, T., et al. (2018) Metabolic Reprogramming in Leaf Lettuce Grown under Different Light Quality and Intensity Conditions Using Narrow-Band LEDs. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 7914.

[25]   Westmoreland, F.M., Kusuma, P. and Bugbee, B. (2021) Cannabis Lighting: Decreasing Blue Photon Fraction Increases Yield but Efficacy Is More Important for Cost Effective Production of Cannabinoids. PLoS ONE, 16, e0248988.