Back
 ABCR  Vol.10 No.3 , July 2021
Clinical Experience and Dosimetry Outcome in Treating Breast Cancer with Field-in-Field Technique
Abstract: Purpose: The study is aimed to establish the dosimetric characteristics of field-in-field (FiF) technique for carcinoma of breast treatment in Nepal. We assumed that FIF technique may result in improved dose distribution and reduced acute toxicity in these patients. Methods: Forty breast cancer patients participated in this study. A total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed to the planning target volume. FiF plan was generated in treatment planning system. Dose volume histograms were evaluated for PTV and organs at risks. Several parameters were analyzed for the PTVs and organ at risks (OARs) together with the Conformity index (CI), and the Homogeneity index (HI). Results: The dose coverage of breast volume was achieved. The V95% (volume of 95%) of PTV covered D95% (Dose of 95%). The PTV dose was covered to 49.98 ± 0.9 Gy and 49.81 ± 1.1 Gy for the left and right breast, respectively. The mean lung dose was 14.87 ± 0.91 Gy. The homogeneity index (0.26 ± 0.17 and 0.22 ± 0.13) and conformity index (1.59 ± 0.75 and 1.36 ± 0.45) were analyzed for left and right breast, respectively. Conclusion: The study supports the viability of FiF technique in the treatment of breast cancer in Nepal. The FIF technique enables better dose distribution in the PTV and reduces dose to OARs. The FiF technique provides dosimetric advantages and requires less planning time.
Cite this paper: Jha, B. , Lamichhane, H. , Prasiko, G. and Srivastava, R. (2021) Clinical Experience and Dosimetry Outcome in Treating Breast Cancer with Field-in-Field Technique. Advances in Breast Cancer Research, 10, 35-43. doi: 10.4236/abcr.2021.103003.
References

[1]   Forouzanfar, M.H., Foreman, K.J., Delossantos, A.M., Lozano, R., Lopez, A.D., Murray, C.J.L., et al. (2011) Breast and Cervical Cancer in 187 Countries between 1980 and 2010: A Systematic Analysis. The Lancet, 378, 1461-1484.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61351-2

[2]   Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R.L., Torre, L.A. and Jemal, A. (2018) Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68, 394-424.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

[3]   Yavas, G., Yavas, C. and Acar, H. (2012) Dosimetric Comparison of Whole Breast Radiotherapy Using Field in Field and Conformal Radiotherapy Techniques in Early Stage Breast Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Research, 10, 131-138.

[4]   Lee, J.-W., Hong, S., Choi, K.-S., Kim, Y.-L., Park, B.-M., Chung, J.-B., et al. (2008) Performance Evaluation of Field-in-Field Technique for Tangential Breast Irradiation. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38, 158-163.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hym167

[5]   Barnett, G.C., Wilkinson, J.S., Moody, A.M., Wilson, C.B., Twyman, N., Wishart, G.C., et al. (2012) Randomized Controlled Trial of Forward-Planned Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer: Interim Results at 2 Years. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 82, 715-723.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.068

[6]   Hartsell, W.F., Murthy, A.K., Kiel, K.D., Kao, M. and Hendrickson, F.R. (1990) Technique for Breast Irradiation Using Custom Blocks Conforming to the Chest Wall Contour. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 19, 189-195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(90)90153-B

[7]   Depuydt, T., Van Esch, A. and Huyskens, D.P. (2002) A Quantitative Evaluation of IMRT Dose Distributions: Refinement and Clinical Assessment of the Gamma Evaluation. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 62, 309-319.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00497-2

[8]   Smith, W., Menon, G., Wolfe, N., Ploquin, N., Trotter, T. and Pudney, D. (2010) IMRT for the Breast: A Comparison of Tangential Planning Techniques. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 55, 1231-1241.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/4/022

[9]   Baycan, D., Karacetin, D., Balkanay, A.Y. and Barut, Y. (2012) Field-in-field IMRT versus 3D-CRT of the Breast. Cardiac Vessels, Ipsilateral Lung, and Contralateral Breast Absorbed Doses in Patients with Left-Sided Lumpectomy: A Dosimetric Comparison. Japanese Journal of Radiology, 30, 819-823.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-012-0126-z

[10]   Moorthy, S., DasMajumdar, S.K., Elhateer, H., Mohan, R. and Mohammed, S. (2013) Dosimetric Analysis of IMRT versus 3DCRT for Chest Wall Irradiation in Patients with Breast Cancer Using 6MV X-Rays. Indian Journal of Research and Reports in Medical Sciences, 3, 36-39.

[11]   Freedman, G.M., Anderson, P.R., Hanlon, A.L., Eisenberg, D., Nicolaou, N. and Li, J. (2004) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Decreases the Acute Skin Toxicity for Large-Breasted Women Receiving Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 60, S401-S402.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.276

[12]   Borges, C., Cunha, G., Monteiro-Grillo, I., Vaz, P. and Teixeira, N. (2014) Comparison of Different Breast Planning Techniques and Algorithms for Radiation Therapy Treatment. Physica Medica, 30, 160-170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.04.006

[13]   Tanaka, H., Hayashi, S. and Hoshi, H. (2014) Determination of the Optimal Method for the Field-in-Field Technique in Breast Tangential Radiotherapy. Journal of Radiation Research, 55, 769-73.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt233

[14]   Sasaoka, M. and Futami, T. (2011) Dosimetric Evaluation of Whole Breast Radiotherapy Using Field-in-Field Technique in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16, 250-256.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-010-0175-1

[15]   Emami, B. (2013) Tolerance of Normal Tissue to Therapeutic Radiation. Reports of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 1, 35-48.

[16]   Darby, S.C., Ewertz, M., McGale, P., Bennet, A.M., Blom-Goldman, U., Brønnum, D., et al. (2013) Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women after Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 987-998.

[17]   Jin, G.-H., Chen, L.-X., Deng, X.-W., Liu, X.-W., Huang, Y. and Huang, X.-B. (2013) A Comparative Dosimetric Study for Treating Left-Sided Breast Cancer for Small Breast Size Using Five Different Radiotherapy Techniques: Conventional Tangential Field, Filed-in-Filed, Tangential-IMRT, Multi-Beam IMRT and VMAT. Radiation Oncology, 8, Article No. 89.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-89

[18]   Zhao, H., He, M., Cheng, G., Han, D., Wu, N., Shi, D., et al. (2015) A Comparative Dosimetric Study of Left Sided Breast Cancer after Breast-Conserving Surgery Treated with VMAT and IMRT. Radiation Oncology, 10, Article No. 231.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0531-4

[19]   Taylor, C., Correa, C., Duane, F.K., Aznar, M.C., Anderson, S.J., Bergh, J., et al. (2017) Estimating the Risks of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Evidence from Modern Radiation Doses to the Lungs and Heart and from Previous Randomized Trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35, 1641-1649.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0722

[20]   Hall, E.J. (2006) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy, Protons, and the Risk of Second Cancers. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 65, 1-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.027

[21]   Xie, X., Ouyang, S., Wang, H., Yang, W., Jin, H., Hu, B., et al. (2014) Dosimetric Comparison of Left-Sided Whole Breast Irradiation with 3D-CRT, IP-IMRT and Hybrid IMRT. Oncology Reports, 31, 2195-2205.
https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3058

 
 
Top