Stability, Chaos Diagnose and Adaptive Control of Two Dimensional Discrete - Time Dynamical System
Show more
Abstract: In this paper 2D discrete time dynamical system is presented. The fixed points were found. The stability of fixed points is measured by characteristic roots, jury criteria, Lyapunov function. All show that the system is unstable, and analyzing the dynamic behavior of the system finds bifurcation diagrams at the bifurcation parameter. Newton’s Raphson numerical method was used the roots of the system with the minimum error. Then, chaoticity is measured by the phase space; maximum Lyapunov exponent is obtain as (Lmax=2.394569); Lyapunov dimension is obtain as (DL=3.366413); binary test (0 - 1) is obtain as (k = 0.982). All show that the system is chaotic. Finally, the adaptive control was performed. Moreover, theoretical and graphical results of the system after control show the system is stable and Lyapunov exponent is obtained as: L1=-0.390000, L2=-0.500000, so the system is regular. 1. Introduction

In the last two decades, the interest in dynamical systems has increased, because they are an important concept in describing the behavior of many models and in various fields. Some studies and research have focused on discrete dynamical systems in which the systems are described in the form of difference equations , as intermittent dynamic systems are more appropriate in describing models, especially when Models have non-overlapping generations, as the computational techniques used in discrete dynamical systems are more effective for numerical simulations, unlike in continuous dynamic systems. Mathematical models have been studied in biology and the environment, which have been described in the form of food chains. Food chains is one of the basic relationships that describe for us the interactions that occur between societies in the field of ecology, which studies the interrelationships between living organisms and the environment in which they are. Malthus  presented a study on the interactions that occur in societies that consist of one species, which were described using difference mathematical equation. There are many mathematical models in ecology that have been touched upon by researchers in this field. One of the most important mathematical models that have received wide attention in recent years is the prey and predator model due to its wide scope of application. The interaction between the prey community and the predator was described by Volterra , Lutka . This type of model was found in temperate regions due to its appropriate environment seasonality, as Holling presented  a more realistic model of prey predator describing for us the interaction of three types of societies, as the relationship in the intermittent dynamic systems between prey and predator societies was and remains one of the important topics in many studies and research because of its importance. This type of the models depends on many assumptions, including that prey societies grow in a limited way when the predator community is absent, and predation societies depend on the presence of prey in order to survive, that is, the rate of the prey community is proportional to the predator community, and finally, we can say that the models in the environmental science are not simple and we cannot rely on the results obtained as stable and perfect results.

Accordingly, the research was arranged as follows: system description, system analysis and finding fixed points , stability analysis    of the fixed points by (characteristic roots equation, jury criteria , Lyapunov function  ), numerical behavior study and finding diagrams of bifurcation of the system  , chaos analysis using maximum Lyapunov exponent and the Lyapunov dimension  and the binary test (0 - 1)  - . In the final section, adaptive control   of the chaotic system is performed, and stability tests and the Lyapunov exponent test are performed.

2. System Description

In this work, a two-dimensional discrete time dynamical system was taken  and defined as follows:

$\left\{\begin{array}{l}{x}_{t+1}={x}_{t}+{a}_{1}{x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)-{a}_{2}{x}_{t}{y}_{t}\\ {y}_{t+1}={y}_{t}+{a}_{2}{y}_{t}\left({x}_{t}-{y}_{t}\right)\end{array}$ (1)

${a}_{1}=2.4,{a}_{2}=2$ (2)

where ${x}_{t}$ represents the prey society and ${y}_{t}$ represents the predator community in discrete time (t), and that ${a}_{1},{a}_{2}$ represent the parameters of the system and are positive, the part: ${x}_{t}\left[1+{a}_{1}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)\right]$ is represents the rate of increase of the prey community in the absence of the predation community, and that Part ${a}_{2}{x}_{t}{y}_{t}$ represents the rate of decline of the prey community due to the presence of the predation community, and ${a}_{2}$ represents the predation parameter, while the part ${y}_{t}\left[1+{a}_{2}\left({x}_{t}-{y}_{t}\right)\right]$ represents the variance in the size of the predation population which depends on the size of the prey community.

3. System Analysis

3.1. Jacobian Matrix

For 2D discrete dynamical system (1) with continuous differentiable transition function ${g}_{1}$ and ${g}_{2}$, given by

$\begin{array}{l}{x}_{t+1}={g}_{1}\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)\\ {y}_{t+1}={g}_{2}\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)\end{array}$

The Jacobian Matrix of system (1) is:

${J}_{\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)}=\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial {g}_{1}}{\partial {x}_{t}}& \frac{\partial {g}_{1}}{\partial {y}_{t}}\\ \frac{\partial {g}_{2}}{\partial {x}_{t}}& \frac{\partial {g}_{2}}{\partial {y}_{t}}\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}1+{a}_{1}-2{a}_{1}{x}_{t}-{a}_{2}{y}_{t}& -{a}_{2}{x}_{t}\\ {a}_{2}{y}_{t}& 1+{a}_{2}{x}_{t}-2{a}_{2}{y}_{t}\end{array}\right]$ (3)

3.2. Fixed Point

In this section we find the fixed points of system (1), assume that ${g}_{1}\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)={x}_{t}$, ${g}_{2}\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)={y}_{t}$

${x}_{t}={x}_{t}+{a}_{1}{x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)-{a}_{2}{x}_{t}{y}_{t}$ (4)

${y}_{t}={y}_{t}+{a}_{2}{y}_{t}\left({x}_{t}-{y}_{t}\right)$ (5)

from Equations (4) and (5) we get the following fixed points:

${q}_{0}=\left(0,0\right)$, ${q}_{1}=\left(1,0\right)$, ${q}_{2}=\left(\frac{{a}_{1}}{{a}_{1}+{a}_{2}},\frac{{a}_{1}}{{a}_{1}+{a}_{2}}\right)$

Theorem (1): Let

$G\left(\lambda \right)={a}_{2}{\lambda }^{2}+{a}_{1}\lambda +{a}_{0}=0$ (6)

A characteristic equation of (3), the following cases are true:

1) If the absolute value of the roots of Equation (6) is less than one, then the fixed point of the system (1) is locally asymptotically stable and is called the sink.

2) If the absolute value of the roots of Equation (6) is greater than one, then the fixed point of the system (1) is unstable and is usually called the source, but if at least one of the values of the roots of Equation (6) is greater than one, then the fixed point is called the Saddle.

3) If the absolute value of the roots of Equation (6) is equal to one, then the fixed point of the system (1) is called the non-hyperbolic point. But if there are no roots of values equal to one, then the fixed point is called the hyperbolic point.

4. Stability Analysis

In this section, the stability of the fixed points of the system (1) using the following criteria:

4.1. Characteristic Equation Roots

Substituting the point ${q}_{0}$ into (3) we get:

${J}_{\left(0,0\right)}=\left[\begin{array}{cc}1+{a}_{1}& 0\\ 0& 1\end{array}\right]$

$\mathrm{det}\left(\lambda I-J\right)=0$

$|\begin{array}{cc}\lambda -1-{a}_{1}& 0\\ 0& \lambda -1\end{array}|=0$

And from Equation (2) we get:

${\lambda }^{2}-4.4\lambda +3.4=0$ (7)

so the roots of quadratic Equation (7) are: ${\lambda }_{1}=1$, ${\lambda }_{2}=3.4$

since $|{\lambda }_{1}|=1$, $|{\lambda }_{2}|=3.4$, so by theorem (1) we get system (1) is unstable at ${q}_{0}$, similarly we test the points ${q}_{1}$ and ${q}_{2}$, the results shown in Table 1 that the three points ${q}_{0},{q}_{1},{q}_{2}$ are saddle.

Lemma (1):

Let the characteristic equation of system (1)

$G\left(\lambda \right)={a}_{2}{\lambda }^{2}+{a}_{1}\lambda +{a}_{0}=0$

Then it’s jury Table 2 is:

Table 1. Stability of fixed points by characteristic equation.

Table 2. Jury table.

Such that

${b}_{k}=|\begin{array}{cc}{a}_{0}& {a}_{n-k}\\ {a}_{n}& {a}_{k}\end{array}|$, $k=0,1$, $n=2$

${c}_{k}=|\begin{array}{cc}{b}_{0}& {b}_{n-1-k}\\ {b}_{n-1}& {b}_{k}\end{array}|$, $k=0$, $n=2$

We say that the fixed point of the system (1) is stable if the satisfies following conditions:

$G\left(1\right)>0$

${\left(-1\right)}^{n}G\left(-1\right)>0$

$|{a}_{0}|<{a}_{n}$, $|{b}_{0}|>|{b}_{n-1}|$, $|{c}_{0}|>|{c}_{n-2}|$

Otherwise, fixed points are unstable.

4.2. Jury Stability Criteria

We test the stability of point ${q}_{0}$, by using lemma (1) and values from eq. (7) we get the jury Table 3, since the condition $|{a}_{0}|=3.4>{a}_{2}=1$, so the point ${q}_{0}$ is unstable. Similarly, we test the rest of the points ${q}_{1},{q}_{2}$, which shows that they are unstable, so the system (1) is unstable.

4.3. Lyapunov Function Criteria

The fixed points are said to be stable using the criterion of the Lyapunov function if $\Delta V\le 0$ except for the origin, which is stable, and to study the stability of the fixed points of the system (1) we impose the quadratic equation of the following Lyapunov function:

$V\left(x,y\right)={x}^{2}+{y}^{2}>0$

Where x, y are not equal to zero, and using ∆V we get:

$\begin{array}{c}\Delta V\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)=V{\left({x}_{t+1},{y}_{t+1}\right)}^{2}-V{\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)}^{2}\\ ={\left({x}_{t}+{a}_{1}{x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)-{a}_{2}{x}_{t}{y}_{t}\right)}^{2}+{\left({y}_{t}+{a}_{2}{y}_{t}\left({x}_{t}-{y}_{t}\right)\right)}^{2}\\ \text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}-{\left({x}_{t}\right)}^{2}-{\left({y}_{t}\right)}^{2}\end{array}$ (8)

By substituting (2) in Equation (8) and test the point ${q}_{2}=\left(0.5454,0.5454\right)$ we get:

Table 3. Jury table of the point q0.

$\begin{array}{l}\Delta V\left(0.5454,0.5454\right)\\ ={\left(0.5454+2.4×0.5454×\left(1-0.5454\right)-2×0.5454×0.5454\right)}^{2}\\ \text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{ }+{\left(0.5454+2×0.5454×\left(0.5454-0.5454\right)\right)}^{2}-{\left(0.5454\right)}^{2}-{\left(0.5454\right)}^{2}\\ =0.1438>0\end{array}$

It is clear that V is positive definite and ∆V is positive, hence the fixed point ${q}_{2}$ is unstable and so system (1) is unstable.

5. The Graphical and Numerical Behavior of System (1)

5.1. Newtons’ - Raphson Method

Newton’s Raphson method is one of the important numerical methods for finding the roots of the difference equations. By using a written programme on MATLAB we get the best result obtained for the system (1) is $\left(x,y\right)=\left(0.5,0.5\right)$ with minimum error (0.0001).

5.2. Trajectories of System (1)

In this section the time behavior of the system (1) was studied and the parameters were fixed at the values ${a}_{1}=2.4$, ${a}_{2}=2$ with the values $\left(x,y\right)=\left(0.5,0.5\right)$ and for (1000) iterations, shown in Figure 1. It turns out that the system behaves unstable.

5.3. Phase Space of System (1)

In this section, the phase space of the system (1) was found, the parameters were fixed at the values ${a}_{1}=2.4$, ${a}_{2}=2$ with the values $\left(x,y\right)=\left(0.5,0.5\right)$ and shown in Figure 2 which show that the system behaves chaotic. In Figure 3

Figure 1. The trajectories of state variables ${x}_{t}$ and ${y}_{t}$, when ${a}_{1}=2.4$.

Figure 2. The phase space of the system (1) at parameter ${a}_{1}=2.4$.

Figure 3. The phase space of the system (1) with some values at parameter ${a}_{1}$.

Figure 4. Bifurcation of parameter ${a}_{1}$ with variable ${x}_{t},{y}_{t}$.

shows that the system (1) generates trajectories chaotic for ${x}_{t}$ and ${y}_{t}$ at some values parameter ${a}_{1}$.

5.4. Bifurcation Diagram

In this section the bifurcation diagrams of system (1) are found at the bifurcation parameter ${a}_{1}$, the parameters ${a}_{2}=2$ with the values $\left(x,y\right)=\left(0.5,0.5\right)$ and the ${a}_{1}$ parameter ranging from 1.8 to 2.7 showing the behavior chaotic of the system (1), also the internal balance of the parameter ${a}_{1}$ on the period [2.6, 2.65], as shown in Figure 4.

6. Lyapunov Exponent and Lyapunov Dimension

The Lyapunov exponent is one of the important tests in detecting the chaotic behavior of dynamic systems, as the system is said to be a chaotic system if one of the values of the Lyapunov exponent is greater than zero, and by using a mathematical program in MATLAB, the Lyapunov exponent of the system (1) was tested and the following values were obtained:

${L}_{1}=2.394569$, ${L}_{2}=-1.011898$

Since one of the values of the Lyapunov exponent of system (1) is a positive value, then system is chaotic, show in Figure 5.

To calculate the Lyapunov dimension of the system (1), we use the following law:

${D}_{L}=p+\frac{{L}_{1}}{|{L}_{2}|}=1+\frac{2.394569}{|1.011898|}=3.366413$

7. Binary Test (0 - 1)

In this section, the binary test was used to analysis the chaos of the system (1), a time series ${x}_{t}$ was generated from the regularity (1) at the parameters ${a}_{1}=2.4$, ${a}_{2}=2$ and the values $\left(x,y\right)=\left(0.5,0.5\right)$ For (1000) iterations, and by using a mathematical program in MATLAB, the binary selection of the system (1), we calculate ${p}_{c}\left(t\right)$ with ${q}_{c}\left(t\right)$ for t = 100 and chose(c) is random value within the period (0, π), show in Figure 6(a), which shows us the behavior aligned to the system and similar to Brownian movement, and the average square displacement ${M}_{c}\left(t\right)$ was calculated with time k, shown in Figure 6(b), which shows us that the average square of the displacement ${M}_{c}\left(t\right)$ It is a function that grows linearly with time (t), and by finding the mean (k) of the contiguous growth ${k}_{c}$ of the mean of the displacement square ${M}_{c}\left(t\right)$ where t = 100 shows that the system behaves in chaotic behavior (k = 0.982) as the mean (k) approaches the one shown in Figure 6(c).

8. Adaptive Control Technique

To achieve the stability of the chaotic system (1) we will design an adaptive control law with the unknown parameter ${a}_{1}$.

$\begin{array}{l}{x}_{t+1}={x}_{t}+{a}_{1}{x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)-2{x}_{t}{y}_{t}+{u}_{1}\\ {y}_{t+1}={y}_{t}+2{y}_{t}\left({x}_{t}-{y}_{t}\right)+{u}_{2}\end{array}$ (9)

where ${u}_{1},{u}_{2}$ are the controllers for the adaptive and are known as follows:

Figure 5. Lyapunov exponent of the system (1).

Figure 6. The binary test of system (1) with ${a}_{1}=2.4$.

$\begin{array}{l}{u}_{1}=-{x}_{t}-{\stackrel{^}{a}}_{1}{x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)+2{x}_{t}{y}_{t}-{M}_{1}{x}_{t}\\ {u}_{2}=-{y}_{t}-2{y}_{t}\left({x}_{t}-{y}_{t}\right)-{M}_{2}{y}_{t}\end{array}$ (10)

where ${M}_{1},{M}_{2}$ are positive constants and the parameter ${\stackrel{^}{a}}_{1}$ is an approximate parameter of the parameter ${a}_{1}$, and by substituting (10) in (9) we get:

$\begin{array}{l}{x}_{t+1}=\left({a}_{1}-{\stackrel{^}{a}}_{1}\right){x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)-{M}_{1}{x}_{t}\\ {y}_{t+1}=-{M}_{2}{y}_{t}\end{array}$ (11)

Let the error for the discretionary parameter be defined as follows:

${e}_{a}={a}_{1}-{\stackrel{^}{a}}_{1}$ (12)

Substituting (12) into (11) we get:

$\begin{array}{l}{x}_{t+1}={e}_{a}{x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)-{M}_{1}{x}_{t}\\ {y}_{t+1}=-{M}_{2}{y}_{t}\end{array}$ (13)

8.1. Numerical Results

In this section, we will test the stability of the fixed points of the system (1) in the controlled system (11) with the values $\left(x,y\right)=\left(0.5,0.5\right)$ and ${M}_{1}=0.4$, ${M}_{2}=0.5$ and the parameter ${\stackrel{^}{a}}_{1}$ is an estimated parameter of the parameter ${a}_{1}$, and let ${\stackrel{^}{a}}_{1}=2.39$.

8.1.1. Characteristic Equation Roots

From (11) the Jacobian matrix is:

${J}_{\left(x,y\right)}=\left[\begin{array}{cc}-0.39-0.02{x}_{t}& 0\\ 0& -0.5\end{array}\right]$ (14)

Table 4 shows that the testing of the ${q}_{0},{q}_{1},{q}_{2}$ of system (11) are stable.

8.1.2. Jury’s Test

We test the stability of the fixed point ${q}_{0}=\left(0,0\right)$, from characteristic equation ${\lambda }^{2}+0.89\lambda +0.195=0$ at point ${q}_{0}$ we get ${a}_{0}=0.195$, ${a}_{1}=0.89$, ${a}_{2}=1$

Then we get Jury Table 5, since, all conditions are satisfies lemma (1), therefore the fixed point ${q}_{0}$ is stable. Similarly, we test the rest of the points ${q}_{1},{q}_{2}$, shown that all are stable.

8.1.3. Lyapunov Function Test

$\Delta V\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)={\left({x}_{t+1}\right)}^{2}+{\left({y}_{t+1}\right)}^{2}-{\left({x}_{t}\right)}^{2}-{\left({y}_{t}\right)}^{2}$

From the system (11) we get

$\Delta V\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)={\left(\left({a}_{1}-{\stackrel{^}{a}}_{1}\right){x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)-{M}_{1}{x}_{t}\right)}^{2}+{\left(-{M}_{2}{y}_{t}\right)}^{2}-{\left({x}_{t}\right)}^{2}-{\left({y}_{t}\right)}^{2}$

Substituting the parameters ${\stackrel{^}{a}}_{1},{a}_{1},{M}_{1},{M}_{2}$ we obtain

$\Delta V\left({x}_{t},{y}_{t}\right)={\left(0.01{x}_{t}\left(1-{x}_{t}\right)-0.4{x}_{t}\right)}^{2}+{\left(-0.5{y}_{t}\right)}^{2}-{\left({x}_{t}\right)}^{2}-{\left({y}_{t}\right)}^{2}$

We test the fixed points ${q}_{0},{q}_{1},{q}_{2}$, it is clear that V is positive definite and ∆V is negative definite, consequently the adaptive strategy success to control system (1), and Table 6 illustrates this.

Table 4. Stability of fixed points by characteristic equation for system (11).

Table 5. The results Jury test of q0.

Table 6. Results of the Lyapunov function test of the system (11).

8.2. Lyapunov Exponent

In this section, the Lyapunov exponent test of the system was performed and the values were obtained ${L}_{1}=-0.390000$, ${L}_{2}=-0.500000$, accordingly, the system is regular and Figure 7 shows that.

Figure 7. Lyapunov exponent of system (11).

9. Conclusion

In this research, 2D discrete - time dynamical system was taken, the system was analyzed, fixed points were found, and the stability analyzed for fixed points using (roots characteristic equation, Jury test, Lyapunov function test). The roots of the system were found using Newton’s Raphson numerical method, and the dynamic behavior was analyzed and studied. The phase space of the system shows that the system is unstable at parameter ${a}_{1}=2.4$. For the chaos analysis of the system, the bifurcation diagrams of the bifurcation parameter ${a}_{1}=2.4$ are found for the system, and the Lyapunov exponent test was used and the value ( ${L}_{\mathrm{max}}=2.394569$ ) was obtained, which is an indication of the chaos of the system. And Lyapunov dimension was calculated as ( ${D}_{L}=3.366413$ ). When using the binary test (0 - 1), it was found that the value of (k = 0.982) with the parameter ${a}_{1}=2.4$ which is an indication of the chaos of the system. Finally, the adaptive control of the system and the stability test of the system after the control was performed which showed us that the system is stable, and when we tested the Lyapunov exponent ( ${L}_{1}=-0.390000$, ${L}_{2}=-0.500000$ ) shown the regular behavior of the system.

Acknowledgements

We would like sincerely thank and also acknowledge to the university of Mosul and college of computer science and mathematics for the support and encouragement that help us to improve the quality of this work.

Cite this paper: Aziz, M.M. and Jihad, O.M. (2021) Stability, Chaos Diagnose and Adaptive Control of Two Dimensional Discrete - Time Dynamical System. Open Access Library Journal, 8, 1-13. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1107270.
References

   Elaydi, S. (2008) An Introduction to Difference Equations. Third Edition, Springer International Edition, Berlin.

   Malthus, T.R. (1798) An Essay on the Principle of Population. J. Johnson, London.

   Voltera, V. (1962) Opere matematiche: Memorie e note. Vol. V, (Cremon) Acc. Naz. dei Lincei, Roma.

   Lotka, A.J. (1925) Elements of Physical Biology. Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore.

   Holling, C.S. (1965) The Functional Response of Predator to Prey Density and Its Role in Mimicry and Population Regulation. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, Vol. 45, 1-60.
https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9745fv

   Alligood, K.T., Sauer, T.D. and Yorke, J.A. (1997) Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59281-2

   Aziz, M.M. (2018) Stability Analysis of Mathematical Model. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7, 147-148.

   Aziz, M.M. and Al-Nuaimi, Z.A. (2013) Stability and Hop-Bifurcation for Diabetes Model. International Journal of Electronics Communication and Computer Engineering, 4, 805-809.

   Hahn, W. (1967) The Stability of Motion. Springer, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50085-5

   Joseph, J. and Allen, I. (1990) Feedback and Control Systems. McGraw-Hill, London.

   Wiggins, S. (1990) An Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Springer-Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4067-7

   Din, Q. (2018) Bifurcation Analysis and Chaos Control in Discrete-Time Glycolysis Models. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 56, 904-931.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-017-0839-4

   Xin, B. and Li, Y. (2013) Bifurcation and Chaos in a Price Game of Irrigation Water in a Coastal Irrigation District. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2013, Article ID: 408904.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/408904

   Melbourne, M., Nicol, I. and Ashwin, P. (2001) Euclidean Extensions of Dynamical Systems. Nonlinearity, 14, 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/14/2/306

   Falconer, I., Gottwald, G.A. and Melbourne, I. (2007) Application of the 0-1 Test for Chaos to Experimental Data. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 6, 395-402.
https://doi.org/10.1137/060672571

   Gottwald, G.A. and Melbourne, I. (2009) On the Implementation of the 0-1 Test for Chaos. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 8, 129-145.
https://doi.org/10.1137/080718851

   Aziz, M.M. and Hamid, M.A. (2019) The Possibility of Increasing the Predictability Indices after Control of 3-D Continuous-Time System. International Conference on Computing and Information Science and Technology and Their Applications, Kirkuk, 3-5 March 2019, 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCISTA.2019.8830650

   Litak, G., Syta, A., Budhraja, M. and Saha, L.M. (2009) Detection of the Chaotic Behaviour of a Bouncing Ball by the 0-1 Test. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 42, 1511-1517.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.048

   Sun, K., Liu, X. and Zhu, C. (2010) The 0-1 Test Algorithm for Chaos and Its Applications. Chinese Physics B, 19, Article ID: 110510.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/19/11/110510

   Zachilas, L. and Psarianos, I.N. (2012) Examining the Chaotic Behavior in Dynamical Systems by Means of the 0-1 Test. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2012, Article ID: 681296.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/681296

   Aziz, M.M. and Merie, D.M. (2020) Stability and Adaptive Control with Synchronization of 3-D Dynamical System. Open Access Library Journal, 7, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106075

   Sundarapandian, V. and Pehlivan, I. (2012) Analysis, Control, Synchronization, and Circuit Design of a Novel Chaotic System. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 55, 1904-1915.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.11.048

   Murray, J.D. (1993) Mathematical Biology. Second Corrected Edition, Springer-Verlg, New York.

Top