Back
 JEAS  Vol.11 No.1 , March 2021
High Performance of Fly Ash Derived Li 4SiO4-Based Sorbents for High Temperature CO2 Capture
Abstract: It is urgent to develop excellent solid CO2 sorbents with higher sorption capacity, simpler synthetic process, better thermal stability and lower costs of synthesis in CO2 capture and storage technologies. In this work, a number of Li4SiO4-based sorbents synthesized by lithium carbonate with three different kinds of fly ashes in various molar ratios were developed. The results indicate that the Li2CO3:SiO2 mole ratio used in the sorbents synthesis significantly affects the CO2 absorption properties. The sorption capacity increased with the excess of Li2CO3 first and then decreased when the excessive quantity was beyond a certain amount. The experiments found that FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4, HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 presented the best sorption ability among these fly ash derived Li4SiO4 samples, and the corresponding weight gain was 28.2 wt%, 25.1 wt% and 32.5 wt%, respectively. The three sorbents with the optimal molar ratio were characterized using various morphological characterization techniques and evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis for their capacity to chemisorb CO2 at 450°C - 650°C, diluted CO2 (10%, 20%) and in presence of water vapor (12%). The adsorption curve of FA- Li4SiO4_0.6 at different temperatures was simulated with the Jander-Zhang model to explore the influence of carbon dioxide diffusion on adsorption reaction. Further experiments showed that the adsorbent had a good sorption capacity in a lower partial pressure of CO2 and the presence of steam enhanced the mobility of Li+. What’s more, FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 particles showed satisfactory sorption capacity in fixed-bed reactor and excellent cyclic sorption stability during 10 sorption/ desorption cycles.

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is considered to be the main cause of greenhouse effect. The CO2 atmospheric concentration has reached an unprecedented high level of 410.79 ppm in 2018 due to the massive emission of carbon dioxide derived from the large-scale combustion of fossil fuel [1] [2] [3]. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been proposed as one of the most promising technologies to mitigate CO2 emissions from flue gases of coal-fired plants and industrial sites [2] [4] [5]. However, it is a big challenge to develop excellent CO2 sorbents with high sorption capacity, simple synthetic process, high thermal stability and low costs of synthesis. The use of solid sorbents at high temperature is receiving increasing attention due to low energy and material consumption compared to low temperature capture system. High-temperature solid sorbents used in post-combustion system can avoid high regeneration requirements, equipment corrosion and high solvent costs problems, and can effectively use the waste heat from power or industrial sites [6]. The typical solid sorbents are hydrotalcite-like sorbents, CaO-based sorbents and Li4SiO4-based sorbents. Hydrotalcite-like sorbents absorb CO2 in the temperature range of 200˚C - 400˚C and can be regenerated at a relatively low temperature. However, its moderate CO2 sorption capacity has quite limited its practical application as a CO2 sorbent. CaO-based sorbents have competitive advantages because of high theoretical sorption capacity and low cost [7]. But the rapid loss of reaction activity due to sintering, attrition and elutriation [8] and high desorption temperature during absorption/desorption cycles challenges its practical application [9].

Li4SiO4 is a promising sorbent because of its high CO2 capture capacity, rapid sorption rates and mild regeneration temperature (<750˚C) compared with the regeneration temperature of CaO (>900˚C) [10] [11] [12]. With the increasing demand of solid CO2 sorbents, reducing the cost of synthesis will undoubtedly enhance the edge of Li4SiO4-based sorbents for CO2 capture in flue gas applications [13] [14]. Low cost materials like fly ash, rice husk ash, diatomite as SiO2 precursors used to synthesize the Li4SiO4-based sorbents has attracted considerable attention in recent years due to their high availability and low cost [15] [16] [17]. Fly ash is a mineral residue resulting from the combustion of coal in power plants, and it contains considerable silica (SiO2), alumina (Al2O3), iron oxides (Fe2O3), calcium oxides (CaO) [18]. Relevant research reported that Li4SiO4 doping with Al, Fe, Ca could enhance its sorption ability and Li+ mobility [19] [20] [21]. Therefore, the preparation of Li4SiO4-based sorbents from fly ash is expected. This practice not only can reduce the cost of CO2 sorbents, but also can solve the problem of fly ash disposal to minimize significant economic and environmental impacts.

Olivares-Marín et al. [22] firstly reported novel Li4SiO4-based sorbents from fly ash. The sorbent derived from fly ash in the presence of 40 mol% K2CO3 presented a 10.7 wt% sorption capacity at 600˚C in 100% CO2 atmosphere and reached the plateau of maximum capture capacity in less than 15 mins. Izquierdo et al. [23] synthesized fly ash derived Li4SiO4-based sorbents and found that the sorption capacity of the sorbents from fly ash and Li2SiO3 or LiOH via solid state method were 7.3 wt% and 11.3 wt% at 600˚C, respectively. In our previous work [24], Li4SiO4-based sorbents from fly-ash(FA) subjected to different pretreatments were synthesized for CO2 capture at high temperatures, finding that different preconditioned FA had different components and significantly affected the morphology, the porosity and the adsorption performance of the sorbents. However, the Li2CO3:SiO2 mole ratio used to synthesize Li4SiO4-based sorbents remains to be studied.

In this work, three starting fly ashes (original fly ash, pre-calcined fly ash, further acid leached and pre-calcined fly ash) were utilized to develop fly ash derived Li4SiO4-based sorbents. The effects of the mole ratios of Li2CO3:SiO2 (fly ash) on sorption capacity, the sorbents compositions and particle size were investigated. The effects of experiment conditions, including the temperature, CO2 partial pressures and moisture were also studied. The fixed-bed reactor has been used to analyze the sorption performance of particle sorbents.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation of Sorbents

Different Li4SiO4-based sorbents were synthesized by using three kinds of fly ashes (FA, CFA, HCl/CFA) and excessive lithium carbonate (AR, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd) as starting materials, and the Li2CO3:SiO2 molar ratio was (2 + x):1, where x varied in the range of 0.1 to 0.7. The CFA was obtained by calcining the original FA at 900˚C for 10 h in air, and the HCl/CFA was obtained as follows: 1) immersing the CFA samples in 10% conc. (weight) HCl aqueous solution at 60˚C for 2 h; 2) washing several times with deionized water until no acid was detected in the filtrate; 3) drying the resultant at 100˚C for 12 h. The quantitative composition of the three fly ashes was analyzed by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer and reported in our previous paper [24]. The mixed powder samples were calcined at 750˚C for 6 h. After calcination, the obtained samples were grounded by using a mortar and were subsequently screened into 20 - 40 mesh large particles, and the rest were further homogenized into powder. The obtained samples from original fly ash, calcined fly ash, further acid leached and pre-calcined fly ash were named as FA-Li4SiO4_x, CFA-Li4SiO4_x and HCl/CFA- Li4SiO4_x, respectively.

2.2. Characterization of Sorbents

The phase compositions of the developed Li4SiO4-based sorbents were analyzed by X-ray diffraction with a diffractometer (RIGAKU D/MAX 2550 VB/PC, Japan) coupled to a copper anode X-ray tube and XRD peaks were identified using Jade 6.0 software. The surface morphologies of the sorbents were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-6360LV). The specific surface area, pore volume and pore size distribution of the synthesized sorbents were determined using a Micromeritics 3H-2720PS4 instrument.

The CO2 sorption isotherms of the synthesized Li4SiO4-based sorbents were tested using a WRT-3P TG equipment. Before CO2 sorption experiments, the sorbents were first heated from room temperature to 700˚C at a heating rate of 20˚C/min in N2 flow (100 mL/min) to remove potential CO2 and moisture until the weight stayed stable. Then, the temperature was changed to the desired sorption temperature, and the flow gas (100 mL/min) was switched to pure CO2 flow or mixture gas (N2 and 10 vol% or 20 vol% CO2) to start the reaction for 150 min. Steam was also introduced into the reaction system, and the concentration of steam was controlled by changing the temperature of the water bath (12 vol% of H2O concentration, vapor pressure of H2O at 50˚C = 0.12 atm). The line from the water bath to the TG was wrapped with thermostatic bandage. Cycling tests were carried out using TGA. Sorption was conducted at 600˚C in pure CO2 flow of 100 mL/min for 30 mins, and desorption was carried out at 700˚C in pure N2 flow of 100 mL/min for 60 mins.

The particles of three fly ash derived Li4SiO4-based sorbents were tested in a fixed-bed reactor at various temperatures under pure CO2 atmosphere. The adsorption section (60 mm long) was filled with 2 g of 20 - 40 mesh sorbent particles mixed with 20 - 40 mesh Rasching ring as a diluting agent. For the breakthrough experiments, the sorbent was heated to 700˚C in N2 flow (100 mL/min) to remove potential CO2 and moisture, and then switched the temperature to desired temperatures (450˚C - 600˚C) to adsorb CO2 in pure CO2 (30 mL/min). The exhaust was analyzed using an online M3000 micro gas chromatograph equipped with a TCD detector and a Porapak Q column. The equilibrium capacity was equal to the quantity of the absorbed CO2 at equilibrium. The calculating equations were as follows [25]:

S abs = S blank S CO 2

Q abs = F × S abs × M CO 2 24.5 × m

Among them, Sblank was the integral value of CO2 concentration with time under the blank test condition; S CO 2 was the integral value of CO2 concentration with time in the outlet gas after the CO2 adsorption reaction; F was the inlet gas flow, in ml/min; 24.5 was the molar volume constant of gas at room temperature; m was the mass of adsorbent added during the reaction process in g; M CO 2 was the molar mass of carbon dioxide.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimization and Characterization of Adsorbents

The CO2 sorption isotherms of three kinds of sorbents from different pretreatments with different Li2CO3:SiO2 molar ratios at 600˚C are shown in Figure 1. It can be seen that the Li2CO3:SiO2 molar ratio had a significant influence on the synthesized sorbents. The overall weight gain of three kinds of sorbents increased

Figure 1. CO2 sorption isotherms of three kinds of sorbents from different pretreatments with different Li2CO3:SiO2 molar ratios at 600˚C: (a) FA-Li4SiO4 sorbents; (b) CFA- Li4SiO4 sorbents; (c) HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4 sorbents.

with the excess of Li2CO3 first, then decreased when the excessive quantity was beyond a certain amount. Among these FA-Li4SiO4 samples, as shown in Figure 1(a), FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 sorbents presented the best sorption ability, whose weight gain was 28.2 wt%. While for CFA-Li4SiO4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4 sorbents, as shown in the Figure 1(b) and Figure 1(c), the optimal samples were CFA- Li4SiO4_0.4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 respectively, and the corresponding sorption capacity was 25.1 wt% and 32.5 wt% respectively. According to the calculation chemical Equation (1), (2), (3) of facts age 6.4, the lithium carbonate can react with the alkali oxides contained in three kinds of FA at 750˚C, and therefore the lithium carbonate was insufficient to produce enough lithium orthosilicate before the content of Li2CO3 reached the optimal level. The by-product Li2SiO3 that has no adsorption capacity at a temperature higher than 250˚C was easy to generate due to the insufficient content of Li, resulting in low adsorption capacity of the synthesized sorbents [25]. However, excessive lithium carbonate doping led to a decrease in the content of the active component lithium orthosilicate in the adsorbent, and thus the adsorption performance decreased.

Li 2 CO 3 + Fe 2 O 3 = 2LiFeO 2 + CO 2 Δ G = 31 . 1kJ (1)

Li 2 CO 3 + Al 2 O 3 = 2LiAlO 2 + CO 2 Δ G = 53 . 16kJ (2)

Li 2 CO 3 + CaO + SiO 2 = Li 2 CaSiO 4 + CO 2 Δ G = 82 . 45kJ (3)

Three optimal Li4SiO4-based sorbents were further characterized by XRD, and the results are shown in Figure 2. The main components of the three sorbents were Li4SiO4, Li2CaSiO4, LiFeO2 and LiAlO2, and a small amount of Ca2SiO4, Li2SiO3, Li2CO3 and Ca(OH)2. The existence of a small amount of Li2CO3 indicates that Li2CO3 was added in excess, which could avoid the formation of Li2SiO3 due to insufficient Li2CO3 and made sure the full reaction of SiO2 and other metal elements. The FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 sorbent had a broad hump in the 2θ region between 18˚ and 35˚ which showed the presence of amorphous glassy phase [26]. This was because the calcination temperature was not enough high to release all amounts of amorphous glassy phase. Compared with FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 and CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4, HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 had no sharp peak of Li2CaSiO4, and the Ca species mainly existed in the form of Ca(OH)2. The decomposition product of Ca(OH)2 was CaO, which could improve the CO2 sorption capability of the sorbent by the occurrence of Li-Ca-CO2 interactions ( Li 4 SiO 4 + CaO + CO 2 Li 2 CaSiO 4 + Li 2 CO 3 ) [13] [21]. Moreover, the peak of LiAlO2 of HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 sorbents increased more remarkably. Relevant literature [20] has reported that LiAlO2 can promote the diffusion of Li+ which is beneficial to the increase of the sorption capacity of these three sorbents.

Figure 3 shows the SEM morphologies of the three optimal fly ash Li4SiO4- based sorbents. It can be seen that CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 was mainly composed of irregular particle sizes, and its average particle sizes were as large as 9 μm.

Figure 2. XRD patterns of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 sorbents.

Figure 3. SEM images of the three optimal sorbents.

Moreover, there were grain agglomerates between particles. This kind of surface morphology is mainly related to the high-temperature solid phase synthesis method because sorbent particles are easy to migrate and aggregate together at high temperatures [27]. While the surface morphologies of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 were obviously different from that of CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4. Their particles were relatively looser and the average particle size was smaller (about 3 μm and 5 μm, respectively). And there were also fewer agglomerations between particles. FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 exhibited the smallest particle size of the three sorbents. It was reported that that alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, Mg, Al and other elements can inhibit the growth of sorbent grains and reduce the sintering effect of sorbent particles [28] [29]. Since the FA was not calcined and contained a large amount of hetero elements such as an alkali metal, the FA derived FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 had smaller particle size.

Figure 4 compares the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of three optimal Li4SiO4-based sorbents. These three sorbents presented similar adsorption/de- sorption isotherms belonging to “type II” isotherm [30], indicating that the resulting sorbent samples had non-porous structure and aggregates of plate-like particles. According to the IUPAC classification, the three sorbents exhibited narrow “H3” hysteresis loops, indicating that the sorbents contained irregular stacked pores or slit-like pores.

Table 1 summarizes the BET surface area, average pore diameter and pore volume for three samples. As can be seen from the table, FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 and

Figure 4. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of three optimal Li4SiO4-based sorbents.

Table 1. Physicochemical properties of three optimal Li4SiO4-based sorbents.

HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 had higher specific surface areas (1.97 and 1.94 m2/g respectively) than CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 (1.0087 m2/g). This result was consistent with the particle size distribution of SEM images. The adsorbent with smaller particles had larger specific surface area. The average pore diameters of three Li4SiO4-based sorbents were between 2 - 50 nm, which belonged to mesoporous materials.

3.2. CO2 Capture Studies

3.2.1. Effect of Temperature

Figure 5 shows the CO2 uptake isotherms of the three sorbents at pure CO2 at different sorption temperatures to evaluate the effect of temperature on CO2 uptake. The CO2 adsorption capacity of these three adsorbents first increased with an increasing temperature and then decreased when the experimental temperature exceeded 600˚C, which showed a similar sorption trend to previous literature [22] [24] [29]. This phenomenon could be mainly attributed to the disappearance of the mesopore on the external shell of the Li4SiO4 at high temperature [29]. FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 obtained its maximum CO2 sorption capacity of 28.2 wt% at 600˚C. Furthermore, when the sorption temperature was 600˚C or 650˚C, the sorption rate of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 was exactly rapid to obtain the maximum capacity

Figure 5. CO2 sorption isotherms of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 under pure CO2 at different temperatures.

within 10 mins, which was faster than other reported low-cost ashes derived from Li4SiO4-based sorbents [17] [22] [27] [31] [32] [33]. For CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4, the sorption capacity was 25.1 wt% at 600˚C. However, its sorption performance at 550˚C reached 26 wt%, beyond that of 600˚C with the sorption time prolonging enough, which is probably attributed to the relatively high content of LiFeO2 in CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 sorbent. The thermodynamic equilibrium temperature of LiFeO2 was about 550˚C via FactSage 6.4 software analysis [24], indicating LiFeO2 can adsorb CO2 at the temperature of 550˚C to a certain extent while it cannot capture CO2 at 600˚C. HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 showed the most excellent sorption capacity among these three sorbents at 450,500,550,600 and 650˚C due to its relatively high surface area and content of LiAlO2. The maximum CO2 sorption capacity for HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 was 32.5 wt% at 600˚C. When the temperature was 650˚C, the CO2 uptake of the sorbent showed a decreasing trend at the later stage of reaction. This is because that too high temperature will lead to an increase in the CO2 equilibrium concentration of the sorbent, while the concentration of CO2 in the gas phase does not change. Therefore, an increase in temperature will lead to a decrease in the driving force of CO2 diffusion to adsorbent particles, which is not conducive to the adsorption reaction, and even leads to the occurrence of a desorption reaction.

In order to understand the reaction mechanism of fly ash derived Li4SiO4-based sorbents, FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 adsorbents in pure CO2 atmosphere at different temperatures were fitted to the Jander-Zhang model. Compared with other simulation methods, the Jander-Zhang model can well explain the influence of the diffusion of CO2 in the shell on the CO2 adsorption characteristics. The Jander-Zhang model assumes that the adsorption reaction is kinetically controlled by the diffusion of CO2, and the effects of the CO2 surface adsorption reaction rate of the adsorbent are not considered. The Jander-Zhang model can be described by the following formula:

[ 1 ( 1 Z α ) 1 / 3 ] 3 = k ( P CO 2 ) n t

where k is the reaction rate constant. represents the proportion of Li2CO3 in the products layer (Li2SiO3 and Li2CO3), and ( 1 Z α ) represents the proportion of unreacted Li4SiO4 and generated Li2SiO3. Because the ratio of density to molar mass of Li2CO3 is similar to Li2SiO3, theoretically Z is supposed to be around 0.5. According to previous literature reports, the products of Li4SiO4 exist in the form of double shells, and the CO2 concentration is nonlinearly distributed in the product layer. During the adsorption process of the Li4SiO4 sorbent, Li+ and O2− are generated on the surface of the unreacted Li4SiO4 and diffuse to the outer surface of Li2SiO3; CO2 diffuses through the solid Li2CO3 layer and reacts with Li+ and O2− on the outer surface of Li2SiO3. Since the size of Li+ and O2− are smaller than CO2 molecules, the diffusion of CO2 in the solid Li2CO3 layer is expected to be much slower than the diffusion of Li+ and O2− in Li2SiO3. Therefore, CO2 diffusion is more likely to be a reaction speed control step [31]. The fitting results of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 adsorbents in pure CO2 atmosphere at different temperatures are shown in Figure 6. The Jander-Zhang model can fit the experimental results well at 450˚C, 475˚C, 500˚C, 525˚C, 550˚C, which means that the diffusion rate of CO2 plays a decisive role in the whole CO2 adsorption process of the adsorbents at a lower temperature. The fact is in agreement with the fitting results of double exponential model reported in previous literature

Figure 6. Fit of CO2 sorption on FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 sorbent with Jander-Zhang model.

[32] [33]. However, when the reaction temperature is more than 600˚C, the Jander-Zhang model cannot fit the initial stage of CO2 adsorption well, which illustrates that at high temperatures, the reaction rate is determined by the surface chemisorption reaction rate in the initial stage of the reaction and by the diffusion rate of CO2 in the later stage of the reaction.

3.2.2. Effect of Diluted CO2 and Moisture on Sorption

The effects of various CO2 concentration and humidity atmosphere on the sorption behavior of the three sorbents were investigated. In this experiment, moisture content of 12 vol% and different CO2 partial pressures (from 10 vol% to 100 vol%) at 600˚C were used to evaluate the influences of humidity and various CO2 partial pressures on the developed Li4SiO4-based sorbents. As can be seen from Figure 7, due to the limitation of sorption equilibrium of Li4SiO4, the weight gain of the three sorbents in the presence and absence of steam decreased when the CO2 partial pressure reduced from 100 vol% to 10 vol% [31]. The adsorption capacity of the three adsorbents in the presence of 20 vol% CO2 can achieve about 70% - 80% of that of the three adsorbents under pure carbon dioxide, indicating that the Li4SiO4-based sorbents have a good practicability at a lower partial pressure of CO2. And the presence of 12 vol% steam enhanced the sorption uptake due to the enhancement of the mobility of Li+ in the diffusion control stage according to double-shell mechanism [34]. As a result, the absorption capability and sorption rate of Li4SiO4-based sorbents were improved.

3.2.3. Fixed-Bed Reactor Test and Stability Test

Besides, a fixed-bed reactor was used to investigate CO2 sorption on the prepared fly ash derived Li4SiO4-based sorbents. Compared to thermogravimetric

Figure 7. CO2 sorption isotherms of (a) FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 and (b) CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 and (c) HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 under different CO2 pressure with 12 vol% H2O.

analysis (TGA), fixed-bed reactors can provide more reliable sorption capacity in formation in practical application. Figure 8 shows the CO2 sorption performance of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 sorbent particles (20 - 40 mesh) in the temperature range from 450˚C to 650˚C in pure CO2 flow in a fixed-bed reactor. It can be seen that the three sorbents had a similar tendency of sorption performance. The equilibrium and breakthrough capacities of three sorbents initially increased and then decreased with the increase of temperature. All of the three sorbents reached the highest sorption capacity at 600˚C, and the maximum sorption capacities of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 were 0.213 g CO2/g sorbent, 0.153 g CO2/g sorbent and 0.238 g CO2/g sorbent respectively. The experimental results

Figure 8. CO2 capture breakthrough curves of (a) FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 and (b) CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 (c) HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 in the fixed-bed reactor at different temperatures in 100 vol% CO2 atmosphere.

in the fixed-bed reactor were consistent with the sorption trends of the powder sorbents tested via TG. Compared with the sorption capacity of the powdered sorbents, the sorption capacity of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 and HCl/CFA- Li4SiO4_0.3 particles was lower than that of the powdered sorbents, which was attributed to the larger diffusion resistance of CO2 in the particulate sorbents than that in the powdered sorbent.

HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 is the best sorbent in terms of sorption capacity, while FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 sorbent has the advantage of simple synthetic process and relatively

Figure 9. Stability test of CO2 sorption-desorption cycles on FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 sorbent (absorption: 600˚C, 100 vol% CO2; desorption: 700˚C, 100 vol% N2).

good adsorption performance, the industrial prospect is promising. Our previous literature [24] has reported the HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4 sorbent had an excellent cyclic performance. In order to investigate the cyclic stability of FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, ten sorption and desorption cycles were carried out in a pure CO2 flow at 600˚C. The results are shown in Figure 9. It can be seen that FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 presented an excellent cycling stability. Its CO2 sorption capacity reduced slightly from 26 wt% to 24 wt% after 10 cycling processes. However, it should be pointed out that during the desorption process, the desorption rate was fast in the early stage, but became slower in the later stage, which resulted in the extension of the whole desorption time. Longer desorption time may be due to the lack of loose porous surface of the sorbent, which leads to a slower desorption rate at a later stage.

4. Conclusions

Li2CO3 and three kinds of fly ash from different pretreatments were used to synthesize Li4SiO4-based sorbents in different Li2CO3:SiO2 molar ratios. The results indicate that the weight gain of three kinds of sorbents first increased with the excess of Li2CO3, and then decreased when the excess exceeded a certain amount. The optimal fly ash derived Li4SiO4-based sorbents with the best sorption ability among these samples are FA-Li4SiO4_0.6, CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3, whose weight gain was 28.2 wt%, 25.1 wt% and 32.5 wt%, respectively. SEM and BET analyses indicate that FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 and HCl/CFA- Li4SiO4_0.3 had smaller particle sizes and higher specific surface areas than that of CFA-Li4SiO4_0.4. And XRD analyses indicate that HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 had a relatively high content of Ca(OH)2 and LiAlO2, which were beneficial to the improvement of the sorption capacity.

The three kinds of optimal sorbents were tested in the temperature range of 450˚C - 650˚C, diluted CO2 (10%, 20%) and in the presence of water vapor (12%). The optimal sorbents showed the best adsorption performance at 600˚C. When the CO2 partial pressure reduced from 100% to 10%, 20%, the CO2 sorption capacity decreased due to the limitation of sorption equilibrium of Li4SiO4. And the adsorption capacity of sorbents at 20 vol% CO2 can reach 70% - 80% of that of the sorbents at 100 vol% CO2. The presence of water vapor enhanced CO2 absorption capacity at 600˚C due to enhancement of the mobility of Li+ in the diffusion control stage according to double-mechanism.

The experimental results indicate that FA-Li4SiO4_0.6 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4_0.3 showed excellent sorption capacity at 600˚C in fixed-bed reactor. Compared with the sorption capacity of the powdered sorbents, the sorption capacity of particles was lower than that of the powdered sorbents. The excellent cyclic sorption stability of FA-Li4SiO4 and HCl/CFA-Li4SiO4 during 10 sorption/desorption cycles were confirmed by previous literature and work in this article respectively.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [Grant No. 16ZR1408200], and the Fundamental Research Founds for the Central University [Grant No. 222201817013].

Cite this paper: Wu, S. , Liang, X. , Zhang, Q. and Zhang, G. (2021) High Performance of Fly Ash Derived Li 4SiO4-Based Sorbents for High Temperature CO2 Capture. Journal of Encapsulation and Adsorption Sciences, 11, 1-17. doi: 10.4236/jeas.2021.111001.
References

[1]   Xu, M., Yu, D., Yao, H., Liu, X. and Qiao, Y. (2011) Coal Combustion-Generated aerosols: Formation and Properties. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33, 1681-1697.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.09.014

[2]   Hu, Y., Liu, W., Yang, Y., Qu, M. and Li, H. (2019) CO2 Capture by Li4SiO4 Sorbents and Their Applications: Current Developments and New Trends. Chemical Engineering Journal, 359, 604-625.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.128

[3]   Jacobson, M.Z. (2009) Review of Solutions to Global Warming, Air Pollution, and Energy Security. Energy and Environmental Science, 2, 148-173.
https://doi.org/10.1039/B809990C

[4]   Tan, Y., Nookuea, W., Li, H., Thorin, E. and Yan, J. (2016) Property Impacts on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Processes: A Review. Energy Conversion and Management, 118, 204-222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.079

[5]   Gibbins, J. and Chalmers, H. (2008) Carbon Capture and Storage. Energy Policy, 36, 4317-4322.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.058

[6]   Hu, Y., Liu, W., Yang, Y., Tong, X., Chen, Q. and Zhou, Z. (2018) Synthesis of Highly Efficient, Structurally Improved Li4SiO4 Sorbents for High-Temperature CO2 Capture. Ceramics International, 44, 16668-16677.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.094

[7]   Wang, J., Huang, L., Yang, R., Zhang, Z., Wu, J., Gao, Y., et al. (2014) Recent Advances in Solid Sorbents for CO2 Capture and New Development Trends. Energy & Environmental Science, 7, 3478-3518.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE01647E

[8]   Sanna, A., Ramli, I. and Maroto-Valer, M.M. (2015) Development of Sodium/Lithium/Fly Ash Sorbents for High Temperature Post-Combustion CO2 Capture. Applied Energy, 156, 197-206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.008

[9]   Hu, Y., Liu, W., Peng, Y., Yang, Y., Sun, J., Chen, H., et al. (2017) One-Step Synthesis of Highly Efficient CaO-Based CO2 Sorbent Pellets via Gel-Casting Technique. Fuel Processing Technology, 160, 70-77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.02.016

[10]   Valverde, J.M., Sanchez-Jimenez, P.E. and Perez-Maqueda, L.A. (2014) Calcium-Looping for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture. On the Adverse Effect of Sorbent Regeneration under CO2. Applied Energy, 126, 161-171.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.081

[11]   Amorim, S.M., Domenico, M.D., Dantas, T.L.P., José, H.J., Moreira, R.F.P.M. (2016) Lithium Orthosilicate for CO2 Capture with High Regeneration Capacity: Kinetic Study and Modeling of Carbonation and Decarbonation Reactions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 283, 388-396.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.083

[12]   Kato, M., Nakagawa, K., Essaki, K., Maezawa, Y., Takeda, S., Kogo, R., et al. (2005) Novel CO2 Absorbents using Lithium-Containing Oxide. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2, 467-475.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02047.x

[13]   Yang, Y., Liu, W., Hu, Y., Sun, J., Tong, X., Li, Q., et al. (2019) Novel Low Cost Li4SiO4-Based Sorbent with Naturally Occurring Wollastonite as Si-Source for Cyclic CO2 Capture. Chemical Engineering Journal, 374, 328-337.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.116

[14]   Seggiani, M., Puccini, M. and Vitolo, S. (2011) High-Temperature and Low Concentration CO2 Sorption on Li4SiO4 based Sorbents: Study of the Used Silica and Doping Method Effects. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 741-748.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.003

[15]   Scaccia, S., Vanga, G., Gattia, D.M. and Stendardo, S. (2019) Preparation of CaO-Based Sorbent from Coal Fly Ash Cenospheres for Calcium Looping Process. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 801, 123-129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.064

[16]   Wang, K., Zhao, P., Guo, X., Han, D. and Chao, Y. (2015) High Temperature Capture of CO2 on Li4SiO4-Based Sorbents from Biomass Ashes. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 34, 526-532.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.11986

[17]   Shan, S., Jia, Q., Jiang, L., Li, Q., Wang, Y. and Peng, J. (2013) Novel Li4SiO4-Based Sorbents from Diatomite for High Temperature CO2 Capture. Ceramics International, 39, 5437-5441.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.051

[18]   Dong, Y.C., Feng, X.Y., Feng, X.F., Ding, Y.W., Liu, X.Q. and Meng, G.Y. (2008) Preparation of Low-Cost Mullite Ceramics from Natural Bauxite and Industrial Waste Fly Ash. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 460, 599-606.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.06.023

[19]   Gauer, C. and Heschel, W. (2006) Doped Lithium Orthosilicate for Absorption of Carbon Dioxide. Journal of Materials Science, 41, 2405-2409.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7070-1

[20]   Ortiz-Landeros, J., Gómez-Yáñez, C., Palacios-Romero, L.M., Lima, E. and Pfeiffer, H. (2012) Structural and Thermochemical Chemisorption of CO2 on Li4+x(Si1-xAlx)O4 and Li4-x(Si1-xVx)O4 Solid Solutions. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 116, 3163-3171.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3006298

[21]   Chen, X., Xiong, Z., Qin, Y., Gong, B., Tian, C., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J.Y. and Zheng, C.G. (2016) High-Temperature CO2 Sorption by Ca-Doped Li4SiO4 Sorbents. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41, 13077-13085.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.267

[22]   Olivares-Marín, M., Drage, T.C. and Maroto-Valer, M.M. (2010) Novel Lithium-Based Sorbents from Fly Ashes for CO2 Capture at High Temperatures. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4, 623-629.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.015

[23]   Izquierdo, M.T., Gasquet, V., Sansom, E., Ojeda, M., Garcia, S. and Maroto-Valer, M.M. (2018) Lithium-Based Sorbents for High Temperature CO2 Capture: Effect of Precursor Materials and Synthesis Method. Fuel, 230, 45-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.041

[24]   Zhang, Q., Liang, X., Peng, D. and Zhu, X. (2018) Development of a Fly Ash Derived Li4SiO4-Based Sorbent for CO2 Capture at High Temperatures. Thermochimica Acta, 669, 80-87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2018.09.002

[25]   Zhang, S., Zhang, Q., Wang, H., Ni, Y. and Zhu, Z. (2014) Absorption Behaviors Study on Doped Li4SiO4 under a Humidified Atmosphere with Low CO2 Concentration. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 17913-17920.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.011

[26]   Bhandari, R., Volli, V. and Purkait, M.K. (2015) Preparation and Characterization of Fly Ash based Mesoporous Catalyst for Transesterification of Soybean Oil. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3, 906-914.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.04.008

[27]   Wang, K., Guo, X., Zhao, P., Wang, F. and Zheng, C. (2011) High Temperature Capture of CO2 on Lithium-Based Sorbents from Rice Husk Ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189, 301-307.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.040

[28]   Ochoa-Fernández, E., Rønning, M., Grande, T. and Chen, D. (2006) Synthesis and CO2 Capture Properties of Nanocrystalline Lithium Zirconate. Chemistry of Materials, 18, 6037-6046.
https://doi.org/10.1021/cm061515d

[29]   Martínezdlcruz, L. and Pfeiffer, H. (2012) Microstructural Thermal Evolution of the Na2CO3 Phase Produced during a Na2ZrO3-CO2 Chemisorption Process. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 116, 9675-9680.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp301917a

[30]   Kruk, M. and Jaroniec, M. (2001) Gas Adsorption Characterization of Ordered Organic-Inorganic Nanocomposite Materials. Chemistry of Materials, 13, 3169-3183.
https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0101069

[31]   Zhang, Q., Peng, D., Zhang, S., Ye, Q., Wu, Y.Q. and Ni, Y.H. (2017) Behaviors and Kinetic Models Analysis of Li4SiO4 under Various CO2 Partial Pressures. AIChE Journal, 63, 2153-2164.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15627

[32]   Alcérreca-Corte, I., Fregoso-Israel, E. and Pfeiffer, H. (2008) CO2 Absorption on Na2ZrO3: A Kinetic Analysis of the Chemisorption and Diffusion Processes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 112, 6520-6525.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp710475g

[33]   Shan, S., Li, S., Jia, Q., Jiang, L., Wang, Y. and Peng, J. (2013) Impregnation Precipitation Preparation and Kinetic Analysis of Li4SiO4-Based Sorbents with Fast CO2 Adsorption Rate. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52, 6941-6945.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie400743p

[34]   Martínez-dlCruz, L. and Pfeiffer, H. (2010) Toward Understanding the Effect of Water Sorption on Lithium Zirconate (Li2ZrO3) during Its Carbonation Process at Low Temperatures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 114, 9453-9458.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1020966

 
 
Top