Back
 OJAppS  Vol.11 No.3 , March 2021
Thermal Tempering Does Not Increase the Survival of Eyed Salmonid Eggs
Abstract: Eyed salmonid eggs can be subjected to large temperature swings during development, particularly when shipped in ice-filled containers from broodstock facilities to production hatcheries. This study examined the effect of thermal tempering on the survival of brown trout Salmo trutta and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss eyed eggs to hatch. Eyed eggs at 1°C were either directly placed in 11°C water or allowed to thermally temper from 1°C to 11°C gradually over an hour. In addition, each of the tempering treatments occurred either with or without a 10-minute iodophor disinfection treatment. Tempering had no significant effect on survival-to-hatch in either species (85% - 97%). However, survival was significantly lower in rainbow trout eggs subjected to iodine disinfection (73% - 75%) compared to non-disinfected eggs (91% - 97%), likely because of the close proximity to hatch. The results of this study indicate that slowly raising the temperature (thermal tempering) of brown trout and rainbow trout eyed eggs is unnecessary. Additionally, iodine disinfection of eyed salmonid eggs in close proximity to hatching should be avoided.

1. Introduction

Large numbers of live salmonid eggs are routinely transported around the world [1]. These eggs are typically shipped at the eyed stage of development in moist air containers [2]. Because ice is used in the shipping containers and shipment frequently occurs during the winter months in the northern latitudes due to spawning times for most salmonids, these eggs commonly arrive at the destination hatchery at temperatures only slightly above freezing. Slowly tempering (adjusting) the eggs to the receiving hatchery water temperature is a common and recommended practice [3] [4] [5]. However, the research to support this practice is severely limited.

Eggs are normally disinfected, after arrival, to reduce the risk of introducing pathogenic microbes [3] [6] [7]. Povidone iodine is the preferred disinfectant for salmonid eggs because of its relative safety, effectiveness, and low toxicity to eggs [6] [8] [9] [10] [11]. The U. S. Food and Drug Administration allows the use of povidone iodine at 100 mg/L active iodine for 10 minutes to surface disinfect salmonid eggs [12].

This study was undertaken because of the lack of published research documenting the need for salmonid egg tempering. In addition, there is no information regarding the potential interaction between tempering and iodine disinfection. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the use of tempering, with and without iodine disinfection, on the survival of brown trout Salmo trutta and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss eyed eggs.

2. Methods

This study examined tempering and disinfection using a 2 × 2 factorial design. Four treatments were used: 1) Both tempering and disinfection, 2) Tempering without disinfection, 3) No tempering with disinfection, and 4) Neither tempering nor disinfection (Table 1). Tempering occurred by placing eggs into 1˚C water, with temperatures slowly increased over one hour to 11˚C. Disinfection occurred by placing the eggs in a solution of 100-ppm active iodine (Ovadine, Syndel Co., Ferndale, Washington, USA) for 10 minutes.

Eyed eggs were received at McNenny State Fish Hatchery, rural Spearfish, South Dakota after overnight shipment in moist air containers with ice. Arrival temperature of the eggs was 1˚C. Immediately after checking the temperature, 300 eggs were removed from the container, and 15 eggs were placed into 20, 10-cm, Petri dishes. Five dishes were used for each of the four treatments (n = 5). Well-water (total hardness as CaCO3, 360 mg/L; alkalinity as CaCO3, 210 mg/L; pH, 7.6; total dissolved solids, 390 mg/L) was used for all experiments. Incubation temperature was 11˚C.

Table 1. 2 × 2 factorial design of experiment. Eggs that were tempered were gradually (over an hour) brought from 1˚C to 11˚C, if eggs were not tempered, they were placed directly into 11˚C water after arrival. Eggs that were disinfected were immersed in 100 ppm active iodine for 10 minutes.

For eggs that were both tempered and disinfected, the Petri dishes contained an iodophor solution at 1˚C. After ten minutes, the eggs were rinsed with 1˚C water and placed back into clean Petri dishes also containing 1˚C water. The dishes were then put into a refrigeration unit (NewAir, Orange County, California, USA) and tempered for one hour to 11˚C. For eggs that were only tempered, the undisinfected eggs were placed into the refrigeration unit and tempered for one hour to 11˚C. Petri dishes with eggs that were only disinfected and not tempered contained the iodophor solution at 11˚C. After ten minutes, the eggs were rinsed with 11˚C water, and placed back into dishes containing 11˚C water prior to incubation. Petri dishes of eggs that were neither tempered nor disinfected contained 11˚C water. All of the dishes were incubated using the technique described previously [13] [14]. Each experiment lasted until all eggs had either hatched or died. Percent survival was calculated (1).

Survival ( % ) = 100 × Numberoffry / initialeggnumber (1)

Two trials were conducted, with one using brown trout eyed eggs and one using rainbow trout eyed eggs. Brown trout (Plymouth strain) eyed eggs were received at McNenny Hatchery on November 25, 2019 from Saratoga National Fish Hatchery (Saratoga, Wyoming, USA). Rainbow trout (Arlee strain) eyed eggs were received on December 2, 2019 from Ennis National Fish Hatchery (Ennis, Montana, USA).

Data were analyzed using the SPSS (24.0) statistical program (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA) using two-way analysis of variance. Significance was predetermined at P < 0.05.

3. Results

Brown trout eyed egg survival-to-hatch was not significantly different among any of the treatments (Figure 1). There was also no significant interaction between tempering and iodine disinfection. There was no significant effect of tempering on rainbow trout eyed egg survival-to-hatch (Figure 2). However, egg survival was significantly less in the eggs that received iodine disinfection. There was no significant interaction between tempering and iodine disinfection.

Figure 1. Mean (±SE) percent survival to hatch of brown trout Salmo trutta eyed eggs which were tempered or un-tempered, with or without iodophor disinfection.

Figure 2. Mean (±SE) percent survival to hatch of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss eyed eggs which were tempered or un-tempered, with or without iodophor disinfection.

4. Discussion

The results of this study indicate that tempering of brown trout and rainbow trout eyed eggs from near freezing during transfer to 11˚C water is not needed. This study contradicts other published recommendations [3] [4] [5] to temper salmonid eggs to water temperatures of the receiving hatchery. Weber et al. [15], using rainbow trout eggs prior to the eyed stage, also reported no difference in the survival when subjected to either a rapid or four-hour temperature switch from 5˚C to 10˚C. However, tempering may be needed for salmonid eggs going from cooler to warmer water within six hours of fertilization [16].

This study only exposed brown trout and rainbow trout eyed eggs to temperatures from near freezing to 11˚C, and the 11˚C used in this study is within the optimum range for incubating brown trout and rainbow trout eggs [15] [17] [18] [19] [20]. It is unknown if tempering would be necessary for eyed brown trout and rainbow trout eggs subjected to temperature ranges above 11˚C or those outside their optimal thermal range. It is also unknown if the results from this study would be similar using eyed eggs from other salmonid species.

The increase in mortality of the rainbow trout eggs receiving iodophor disinfection was likely due to the advanced developmental stage of these eggs. Disinfection of salmonid eyed-eggs in a buffered iodophor solution of 100 mg/L active iodine is a safe and well-documented practice [3] [6] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]. However, hatchery salmonid fry are much more susceptible to iodine toxicity than eggs [25]. Piper et al. [3] state that iodophor disinfection treatments should not be used on salmonid eggs within five days of hatching to avoid iodine-induced fry mortality. Avoidance of iodine exposure close to egg hatching is widely recommended [4] [26].

It is very unlikely that the increase in temperature used in this study led to skeletal deformities or other issues identified with heat shock in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar [27] and zebrafish Danio rerio [28]. These negative effects are caused by multiple, long-period (24-hour) heat shocks at stages of development prior to egg eye-up. The eyed eggs as used in this experiment were at a much later stage of development and were not exposed to high temperatures outside of their optimal incubation range.

In conclusion, this study clearly shows that tempering of brown trout and rainbow trout eyed eggs arriving at 1˚C to at least 11˚C is unnecessary and will not improve egg survival. Further experimentation is needed to determine if tempering is beneficial for more than the 10˚C increase used in this study. In addition, the usefulness of tempering eggs at different developmental stages and from different species.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Aaron Chapman for his assistance with this study.

Cite this paper: Slama, L. , Huysman, N. , Voorhees, J. and Barnes, M. (2021) Thermal Tempering Does Not Increase the Survival of Eyed Salmonid Eggs. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 11, 287-293. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2021.113021.
References

[1]   Jansen, M. and McLeary, R. (1996) Characteristics of Current International Trade of Live Salmonid Eggs. Revue Scientifique et Technique—Office International des épizooties, 15, 423-431.
https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.15.2.930

[2]   Pennell, W., Lane, E.D. and Dalziel, F. (2001) Open Systems: The Culture of Fish for Release into Natural Systems. In: Wedemeyer, G.A., Ed., Fish Hatchery Management, 2nd Edition, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 187-239.

[3]   Piper, R.G., McElwain, I.B., Orme, L.E., McCraren, J.P., Fowler, L.G. and Leonard, J.R. (1982) Fish Hatchery Management. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC.

[4]   Staff, F. (1983) Fish Culture Manual. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Juneau.
http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/FedAidPDFs/FRED.FISHCULTUREMANUAL.pdf

[5]   Hinshaw, J.M. and Thompson, S.L. (2000) Trout Production: Handling Eggs and Fry. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, Stoneville, 220.
https://appliedecology.cals.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/220.pdf

[6]   McFadden, T.W. (1969) Effective Disinfection of Trout Eggs to Prevent Egg Transmission of Aeromonas liquefaciens. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 26, 2311-2318.
https://doi.org/10.1139/f69-225

[7]   Amend, D.F. and Pietsch, J.P. (1972) Virucidal Activity of Two Iodophors to Salmonid Viruses. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, 61-65.
https://doi.org/10.1139/f72-008

[8]   Ross, A.J. and Smith, C.A. (1972) Effect of Two Iodophors on Bacterial and Fungal Fish Pathogens. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, 1359-1361.
https://doi.org/10.1139/f72-209

[9]   Backer, H. and Hollowell, J. (2000) Use of Iodine for Water Disinfection: Iodine Toxicity and Maximum Recommended Dose. Environmental Health Perspectives, 8, 679-684.
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108679

[10]   Fraise, A.P., Lambert, P.A. and Maillard, J.-Y. (2004) Russel, Hugo and Ayliffe’s Principles and Practice of Disinfection, Preservation and Sterilization. Blackwell, Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755884

[11]   Wagner, E.J., Oplinger, R.W. and Bartkey, M. (2012) Effect of Single or Double Exposures to Hydrogen Peroxide or Iodine on Salmonid Egg Survival and Bacterial Growth. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 74, 84-91.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15222055.2011.649887

[12]   United States Food and Drug Administration (2018) Center for Veterinary Medicine Program Policy and Procedures Manual 1240.4200 Supplemental Policies Enforcement Priorities for Drug Use in Aquaculture Part A Enforcement Priorities for Drug Use in Non-Food Fish.
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/Policies
ProceduresManual/UCM046931.pdf

[13]   Barnes, M.E. and Durben, D.J. (2008) Petri Dish Incubation of Eyed Eggs from Rainbow Trout and Splake. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 70, 410-414.
https://doi.org/10.1577/A07-057.1

[14]   Neumiller, H.K., Blain, G.A. and Barnes, M.E. (2017) Incubation of Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Eggs in Petri Dishes. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 79, 183-186.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15222055.2017.1281854

[15]   Weber, G.M., Martin, K., Kretzer, J., Hao, M. and Dixon II, D. (2016) Effects of Incubation Temperatures on Embryonic and Larval Survival in Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 28, 258-297.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10454438.2016.1212447

[16]   Wagner, E.J., Arndt, R.E. and Roubidoux, R. (2006) The Effect of Temperature Changes and Transport on Cutthroat Trout Eggs Soon after Fertilization. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 68, 235-239.
https://doi.org/10.1577/A05-065.1

[17]   Combs, B.D. and Burrows, R.E. (1957) Threshold Temperatures for the Normal Development of Chinook Salmon Eggs. The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 19, 3-6.
https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1957)19[3:TTFTND]2.0.CO;2

[18]   Kwain, W. (1975) Embryonic Development, Early Growth, and Meristic Variation in Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) Exposed to Combinations of Light Intensity and Temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 32, 397-402.
https://doi.org/10.1139/f75-046

[19]   Raleigh, R.F., Hickman, T., Solomon, R.C. and Nelson, P.C. (1984) Habitat Suitability Information: Rainbow Trout. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-82/10.60.
https://www.deq.idaho.gov/media/1118351/habitat-suitability-information-rainbow-trout.pdf

[20]   Ojanguren, A.F. and Braña, F. (2003) Thermal Dependence of Embryonic Growth and Development in Brown Trout. Journal of Fish Biology, 62, 580-590.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00049.x

[21]   Amend, D.F. (1974) Comparative Toxicity of Two Iodophors to Rainbow Trout Eggs. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 103, 73-78.
https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1974)103<73:CTOTIT>2.0.CO;2

[22]   Alderman, D.J. (1984) The Toxicity of Iodophors to Salmonid Eggs. Aquaculture, 40, 7-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(84)90211-4

[23]   Wagner, E.J., Oplinger, R.W., Arndt, R.E., Forest, A.M. and Bartley, M. (2010) The Safety and Effectiveness of Various Hydrogen Peroxide and Iodine Treatment Regimens for Rainbow Trout Egg Disinfection. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 72, 34-42.
https://doi.org/10.1577/A09-005.1

[24]   Huysman, N., Bergmann, D., Nero, P., Larson, J., Sabrowski, V. and Barnes, M.E. (2018) Increasing Iodine Concentrations during Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Egg Disinfection Decrease Bacterial Numbers with No Impact on Egg Survival. North American Journal of Aquaculture, 80, 363-368.
https://doi.org/10.1002/naaq.10042

[25]   Laverock, M.J., Stephenson, M. and McDonald, C.R. (1995) Toxicity of Iodine, Iodide, and Iodate to Daphnia Magna and Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 29, 344-350.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212499

[26]   United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2021) Iodophor Disinfection of Fish Eggs.
https://www.fws.gov/policy/aquatichandbook/Volume_3/Section_1.pdf

[27]   Wargelius, A., Fjelldal, P.G. and Hansen, T. (2005) Heat Shock during Early Somitogenesis Induces Caudal Vertebral Column Defects in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Development Genes and Evolution, 215, 350-357.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-005-0482-0

[28]   Roy, M.N., Prince, V.E. and Ho, R.K. (1999) Heat Shock Produces Periodic Somatic Disturbances in the Zebrafish Embryo. Mechanisms of Development, 85, 27-34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00039-8

 
 
Top