Although Carmeli described the temperature of the early universe using his own Cosmological Special Relativity (CSR) theory   , it was about an order of magnitude lower than the standard model. But closer study reveals that when proper account is taken for the internal degrees of freedom of the elementary particles at the epoch of nucleosynthesis, that the temperature vs. time relationship so obtained is equivalent with that of the standard model. This, by itself, would make the nucleosynthesis reactions analysis for CSR identical with the results of the standard model. In this regard, we will not carry out any light element synthesis since these have already been adequately explored .
2. Mass Density
In CSR, the redshift z of light emitted in the past at time t' when the size of the universe had a radius of R(t') is defined by
where R0 is the radius of the universe at the present epoch of time. It can be shown  that the relation for z takes the form
where τ is the Hubble-Carmeli time constant, the age of the universe in Carmeli cosmology. Combining (1) and (2), in CSR, a distance R0 measured by an observer at the present epoch time , transforms to the distance R(t') for a time t' in the past given by
with the limit into the past being the big bang time . Note that in the Carmeli cosmological theory, time is measured from the present at toward the past at time . The Hubble constant . If we take to be the radial distance to the edge of the universe, where c is the speed of light in vacuum and φ0(t') is a scaling factor, then R(t') from (3) is the universe radius at a past time t'.
For nucleosynthesis studies it is conventional to measure time from the big bang toward the present. Transforming (3) by the change of variable , we have for the universe radius
wheret is the time measured from the big bang when toward the present when and the scaling factor
where is the present CMB temperature and is the past radiation field temperature, for which we will give a derivation subsequently. Note that the cutoff time is an approximate time representing the recombination time when the universe temperature was 0.3 eV, and this cutoff time should expect to be tweaked when studying that period.
The mass density ρ(t) of the universe is defined to be composed of a relativistic mass density ρr(t) and a non-relativistic mass density ρm(t), where the total mass density .
We define the non-relativistic mass density in the usual way,
where Mm is the total non-relativistic (rest) mass of the universe and V(t) is the volume of the universe. The non-relativistic mass is defined by
where is the total mass of the universe and fm and gt are coefficients which depend on the baryon to photon number density ratio η and the baryon number density nB at the present time. Expressions for these constant coefficients will be shown to be given by
where is the black body average energy coefficient, G is Newton’s gravitational constant, kB is Boltzmann’s constant, is the present CMB temperature and the baryon density parameter , where mp is the proton mass and is the critical mass density. We use the standard value . For and , we have and .
The relativistic mass is defined by
The volume for Euclidean flat space is given by
The non-relativistic mass density (6), using (7) and (11) is given by
The relativistic mass density ρr(t), using (10) and (11), is given by
The total mass density parameter is given by the sum of (12) and (13) divided by the critical density ρc,
Figure 1 shows the total mass density parameter Ω(t) for the first 1000 seconds since the big bang. Using (8) and (9) in (14), the total mass density parameter at the present epoch takes on the value .
3. Mass Density vs. Temperature
Assuming that the universe expands adiabatically, the relativistic density ρs(T) of the universe is related to the temperature by .
Figure 1. Total mass density parameter. The horizontal axis is time in seconds since the big bang.
where ga(T) is the effective number of degrees of freedom for the particles involved in the annihilation process at temperature T, where T is in MeV. Take the density (13), scale it and convert it from ergs to MeV and equate it to (15), yielding,
where . Equation (16) can be put into the form of time (seconds) since the big bang as a function of temperature (MeV),
Equation (16) can also be put into the form of temperature (MeV) as a function of time (seconds) since the big bang,
Setting (after e+, e− annihilation when the temperature and the neutrinos have decoupled), setting and ignoring any further reactions such as the recombination period when the temperature was around 0.3 eV, (18) gives
which we used in (5).
Since at early times, it can be neglected so that (18) can be written more simply
which is equivalent to the expression in , Eq. 43,
The equivalence of the Carmeli big bang temperature model (20) with the standard model (21), implies that light element reaction analysis using Carmeli’s model will agree with the standard model nucleosynthesis results.
Figure 2. Temperature of the universe. The horizontal axis is time in seconds since the big bang. Open circles are for the standard model. Crosses are for the Carmeli model.
Figure 3. Temperature of the universe. The horizontal axis is time in seconds since the big bang.
Expansion rate equation H(t)
We now take the time rate of change of the universe radius given by (4) relative to R(t), obtaining the expansion rate H(t),
where the approximation is good for as is the case for BBN. This is equivalent to the standard Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker expansion rate for Euclidean space (zero curvature) , implying that we are in agreement with the standard big bang model.
Derivation of fm and gt
We derive expressions for fm and gt in terms of the baryon to photon number ratio , where nB(t) is the baryon number density and nγ(t) is the photon number density, and where , where mp is the proton rest mass and , where is the average energy of the photons in the black body radiation field at temperature T(t). Using (12) and (13) we have
where T(t) is the temperature (K) at time t since the big bang and is given by
where is given by (5).
From (24) we can solve for gt,
Using (23) for nB(τ) at time and (27) for gt, we can solve for fm,
where and .
We have shown that CSR is quite adequate for a development of a nuclear physical analysis of the very early moments of the universe, from 10−3 sec. to 103 sec. The modeling assumes two possible final temperatures for the universe, , which is the temperature the universe would attain at the present epoch if there were no recombination at time , and , which is the present CMB temperature including the recombination period when the temperature was about 0.3 eV (3500 K). The details of the transition in temperature at the recombination period are not covered in this report, but we should expect some modifications to the temperature profile when that analysis is carried out.
Consider the neutron to proton ratio using CSR based on , Equation (1),
where n is the number of neutrons, p is the number of protons, , where and are the masses of the neutron and proton, respectively, and T is the temperature in MeV. The neutron mean lifetime (Hikasa, et al. 1992.) Figure 4 is a plot of the neutron to proton ratio using (29).
Substituting for temperature T as a function of time t from (20) into (29) yields the neutron to proton ratio as a function of time,
where . Figure 5 is a plot of the neutron to proton ratio using (30).
The relativistic mass density ρS(T) of (15) along with (16) is equivalent to the
Figure 4. Neutron to proton ratio vs. temperature. The horizontal axis is the temperature in MeV.
Figure 5. Neutron to proton ratio vs. time. The horizontal axis is time in seconds since the big bang.
energy density given by Eq. (22.41) in . This determines that the temperature at time , shown in Figure 3, is as required for the synthesis of the light elements , Sect. 23.1. Thus, Carmeli’s CSR theory, taking into account the internal degrees of freedom of the particles involved in the processes, has a well suited framework to describe the details of primordial nucleosynthesis.
Using (4), the rate of acceleration of the expanding universe is given by the time rate of change of the Hubble parameter H(t), defined in (22), and is given by
The standard Lambda-Cold-Dark-Matter model  , indicates that the rate of the expansion has been accelerating from around 10 billion years after the big bang when the redshift was . This is in contrast to the CSR model. Figure 6 is shown the acceleration Ḣ(t) from (31) for present cosmic times. We note that the acceleration remains negative (deceleration) from the big bang era up to the present. There is no need for the concept of dark matter and dark energy in the CSR model of the universe  .
A plot of Ω(t) for the present times from around 2.26 × 109 years up to 13.6 × 109 years since the big bang is shown in Figure 7. The density decreases through unity and ends up at the current value of . Figure 8 is
Figure 6. dH/dt in the present cosmos from 2.26 billion years up to the present time of 13.6 billion years since the big bang. The acceleration is negative (decelerating) from the big bang to the present. The horizontal axis is time in years since the big bang.
Figure 7. Total mass density parameter Omega(t) in the current cosmos from around 2.26 billion years up to the present time of 13.6 billion years since the big bang. The horizontal axis is time in years since the big bang.
Figure 8. Omega_m(t) during the big bang nucleosynthesis period. The horizontal axis is time in seconds since the big bang.
shown the matter density parameter from (12), , for the first 1000 seconds since the big bang.
 Behar, S. and Carmeli, M. (2000) Cosmological Relativity: A New Theory of Cosmology. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 39, 1375-1396.
 Smith, M.S., Kawano, L.H. and Malaney, R.A. (1993) Experimental, Computational and Observational Analysis of Primordial Nucleosynthesis. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 85, 219-247.
 Oliveira, F.J. (2016) Cosmic Time Transformations in Cosmological Relativity. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 2, 253-279.
 Riess, A.G., Strolger, L.-G., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H.C., Mobasher, B., et al. (1998) Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. Astronomical Journal, 116, 1009.
 Frieman, J.A., Turner, M.S. and Huterer, D. (2008) Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 46, 385-432.