Back
 JHRSS  Vol.8 No.4 , December 2020
The Endogenous Mode of Beautiful Rural Construction: A Case of China
Abstract: [Objective] An endogenous mode (EM) for beautiful rural construction (BRC) considers the transformation of rural endogenous energy, and the rational choice of a Rural Revitalization Strategy (RRS). The driving force creating the endogenous mode comes from an actor network process, which is composed of new technology, new industry, and new business forms. The EM is also a process by which the combination of innovations by multiple actors replaces traditional simple exogenous innovation. [Methods] Focusing on Dalishu village (DLS) in China as a case study, this research analyzed the characteristics of endogenous energy transformation in an actor-network node into an endogenous mode of BRC, using a social network analysis method. This paper proposes the theoretical framework of an EM for BRC, which integrates all stakeholders, and promotes the transformation of the BRC mode from materialized productivity to the post-productivity of shared experiential services. [Result] EM is closely related to actor-network construction. The more centrally located the actor node is, the greater the transformation energy is, the higher the transformation efficiency is. The stronger the central potential of the entire network is, the stronger the sustainability of the endogenous mode is. [Conclusion] When considering the five strategic objectives of supply side structural reform, it is important to adjust the strong and weak relationships among different actors, strengthen the interaction among actors across network nodes, and improve the high-quality efficiency of EM. Cultivating actors with high transformation efficiency, strengthening the relationship between network participants, and planning and building a shared space can promote the role and change the status of actors, improving the efficiency of EM.
Cite this paper: Zheng, L. , Li, G. , Guo, Y. and Wang, H. (2020) The Endogenous Mode of Beautiful Rural Construction: A Case of China. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 8, 349-370. doi: 10.4236/jhrss.2020.84020.
References

[1]   Ai, S.-W., & Miao, C.-H. (2010). “Space of Places”, “Space of Flows” and “Space of Actor-Networks”: From the Perspective of ANT. Human Geography, 25, 43-49.

[2]   Allen, C. D. (2011). On Actor-Network Theory and Landscape. Area, 43, 274-280.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01026.x

[3]   Barnes, M. L., Wang, P., Cinner, J. E., Graham, N. A. J., Guerrero, A. M., Jasny, L., Lau, J., Sutcliffe, S. R., & Zamborain-Mason, J. (2020). Social Determinants of Adaptive and Transformative Responses to Climate Change. Nature Climate Change, 10, 823-828.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0871-4

[4]   Chen, C., Woods, M., Chen, J. L., Liu, Y. Q., & Gao, J. L. (2019). Globalization, State Intervention, Local Action and Rural Locality Reconstitution—A Case Study from Rural China. Habitat International, 93, Article ID: 102052.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102052

[5]   Chen, H. S., & Wang, X. P. (2019). Exploring the Relationship between Rural Village Characteristics and Chinese Return Migrants’ Participation in Farming: Path Dependence in Rural Employment, Cities, 88, 136-143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.016

[6]   Chen, K. Q., Long, H. L., Liao, L. W., Tu, S. S., & Li, T. T. (2020). Land Use Transitions and Urban-Rural Integrated Development: Theoretical Framework and China’s Evidence. Land Use Policy, 92, Article ID: 104465.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104465

[7]   Cumming, G. S., & Stephan, C. T. (2018). Linking Economic Growth Pathways and Environmental Sustainability by Understanding Development as Alternate Social-Ecological Regimes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 9533-9538.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807026115

[8]   Gao, C. L., & Cheng, L. (2020). Tourism-Driven Rural Spatial Restructuring in the Metropolitan Fringe: An Empirical Observation. Land Use Policy, 95, Article ID: 104609.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104609

[9]   Gao, J., & Wu, B. H. (2017). Revitalizing Traditional Villages through Rural Tourism: A Case Study of Yuanjia Village, Shaanxi Province, China. Tourism Management, 63, 223-233.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.04.003

[10]   Gautam, Y., & Andersen, P. (2016). Rural Livelihood Diversification and Household Well-Being: Insights from Humla, Nepal. Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 239-249.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.001

[11]   Ge, D. Z., Long, H. L., Qiao, W. F., Wang, Z. W., Sun, D. Q., & Yang, R. (2020). Effects of Rural-Urban Migration on Agricultural Transformation: A Case of Yucheng City, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 85-95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.010

[12]   Huang, Y. L., & Yu, X. (2010). Identification of Key Elements of Regional Innovation Environment Based on Social Network Analysis. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications: Social Science Edition, 12, 84-89.

[13]   Jungsberg, L., Copus, A., Herslund, L. B., Nilsson, K., Perjo, L., Randall, L., & Berlina, A. (2020). Key Actors in Community-Driven Social Innovation in Rural Areas in the Nordic Countries. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 276-285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.004

[14]   Kuang, F. Y., Jin, J. J., He, R., Wan, X. Y., & Ning, J. (2019). Influence of Livelihood Capital on Adaptation Strategies: Evidence from Rural Households in Wushen Banner, China. Land Use Policy, 89, Article ID: 104228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104228

[15]   Law, J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network-Ordering. Strategy and Heterogeneity, Systems Practice, 5, 379-393.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830

[16]   Li, L. H., Fu, D. F., & Liu, R. (2014). Spatial Turn of Tourism Studies: A Review on Tourism Studies from the Perspective of the Actor-Network Theory. Tourism Tribune, 29, 107-115.

[17]   McKitterick, L., Quinn, B., McAdam, R., & Dunn, A. (2016). Innovation Networks and the Institutional Actor-Producer Relationship in Rural Areas: The Context of Artisan Food Production. Journal of Rural Studies, 48, 41-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.005

[18]   Richter, R. (2019). Rural Social Enterprises as Embedded Intermediaries: The Innovative Power of Connecting Rural Communities with Supra-Regional Networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 179-187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.005

[19]   Rodger, K., Moore, S. A., & Newsome, D. (2009). Wildlife Tourism, Science and Actor Network Theory. Annals of Tourism Research, 36, 645-666.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.06.001

[20]   Steen, J. (2010). Actor-Network Theory and the Dilemma of the Resource Concept in Strategic Management. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 324-331.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.05.003

[21]   Tang, Z. C. (2019). Rural Revitalization and Scientific Management in the Pearl River Delta—Scientific Decision Based on Scientific Rationality and Public Understanding. Global Transitions, 1, 241-250.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.11.003

[22]   Tödtling, F. (2020). Regional Development, Endogenous. In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2nd ed., pp. 303-308). Oxford: Elsevier.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10121-0

[23]   Vlaev, I. (2018). Local Choices: Rationality and the Contextuality of Decision-Making. Brain Sciences, 8, 8.
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8010008

[24]   Wang, L., & Xiao, S. Z. (2020). Tourism Space Reconstruction of a World Heritage Site Based on Actor Network Theory: A Case Study of the Shibing Karst of the South China Karst World Heritage Site. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 8, 140-151.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.05.005

[25]   Yin, S., Yang, X. J., & Chen, J. (2020). Adaptive Behavior of Farmers’ Livelihoods in the Context of Human-Environment System Changes. Habitat International, 100, Article ID: 102185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102185

[26]   Zang, Y. Z., Liu, Y. S., Yang, Y. Y., Woods, M., & Fois, F. (2020). Rural Decline or Restructuring? Implications for Sustainability Transitions in Rural China. Land Use Policy, 94, Article ID: 104531.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104531

[27]   Zheng, L. J. (2010). Construction of Eco-Experiencescape: A Case Study of Da Lishu Village in Dandong. Journal of Eastern Liaoning University (Sciences), 12, 36.

[28]   Zheng, L. J. (2017). Study on the Development of Rural Ecological Experience Tourism—A Case Study of Dandong (pp. 57-75). Beijing: Economic Science Press.

[29]   Zheng, L. J. (2018). Analysis on the Transformation and Upgrading of Rural Tourism Based on Actor-Network Theory. Social Scientist, No. 10, 91-97.

[30]   Zheng, L. J., & Liu, H. Q. (2018). Identification of Focal Actors in The Translation of the Rural Tourism Actor-Network: A Case in China. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 17, 2812-2821.
https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2018.180

[31]   Zheng, L. J., Wang, H. Y., Luo, Y. Y., & Zhou, X. L. (2019). Multifunctional Landscape Actor-Network Construction from the Perspective of Rural Tourism Experiences. Journal of Landscape Research, 11, 79-86.

 
 
Top