Back
 EPE  Vol.12 No.8 , August 2020
Optimal Portfolio Selection of Wind Power Plants Using a Stochastic Risk-Averse Optimization Model, Considering the Wind Complementarity of the Sites and a Budget Constraint
Abstract: This work focuses on the best financial resources allocation to define a wind power plant portfolio, considering a set of feasible sites. To accomplish the problem formulation and solution, the first step was to establish a long-term wind series reconstruction methodology for generating scenarios of wind energy, applying it to study five different locations of the Brazilian territory. Secondly, a risk-averse stochastic optimization model was implemented and used to define the optimal wind power plant selection that maximizes the portfolio financial results, considering an investment budget constraint. In a sequence, a case study was developed to illustrate a practical situation of applying the methodology to the portfolio selection problem, considering five wind power plants options. The case study was supported by the proposed optimization model, using the scenarios of generation created by the reconstruction methodology. The obtained results show the model performance in terms of defining the best financial resources allocation considering the effect of the complementarity between sites, making it feasible to select the optimal set of wind power plants, characterizing a wind plant optimal portfolio that takes into account the budget constraint. The adopted methodology makes it possible to realize that the diversification of the portfolio depends on the investor risk aversion. Although applied to the Brazilian case, this model can be customized to solve a similar problem worldwide.
Cite this paper: Camargo, L. , Leonel, L. , Rosa, P. and Ramos, D. (2020) Optimal Portfolio Selection of Wind Power Plants Using a Stochastic Risk-Averse Optimization Model, Considering the Wind Complementarity of the Sites and a Budget Constraint. Energy and Power Engineering, 12, 459-476. doi: 10.4236/epe.2020.128028.
References

[1]   IRENA (2020) Renewable Capacity Statistics 2020. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu Dhabi.
https://www.irena.org

[2]   EPE (2019) Decade Energy Plan 2029. EPE, Rio de Janeiro.
https://www.epe.gov.br/pt

[3]   Verdejo, H., Escudero, W., Kliemann, W., Awerdin, A., Becker, C. and Vargas, L. (2016) Impact of Wind Power Generation on a Large-Scale Power System Using Stochastic Linear Stability. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40, 7977-7987.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.04.020

[4]   Mars, P., O’Sullivan, A. and Keppo, I. (2020) Estimating the Impact of Variable Renewable Energy on Base-Load Cycling in the GB Power System. Energy, 195, Article ID: 117041.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117041

[5]   Milligan, M., Kirby, B., Acker, T., Ahlstrom, M., Frew, B., Goggin, M., et al. (2015) Review and Status of Wind Integration and Transmission in the United States: Key Issues and Lessons Learned. NREL.
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/61911.pdf
https://doi.org/10.2172/1214995


[6]   Bagatini, M., Benevit, M.G., Beluco, A. and Risso, A. (2017) Complementarity in Time between Hydro, Wind and Solar Energy Resources in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, in Southern Brazil. Energy and Power Engineering, 9, 515-526.
https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2017.99036

[7]   Cantao, M.P., Bessa, M.R., Bettega, R., Detzel, D.H.M. and Lima, J.M. (2017) Evaluation of Hydro-Wind Complementarity in the Brazilian Territory by Means of Correlation Maps. Renewable Energy, 101, 1215-1225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.10.012

[8]   Castro, R. and Crispim, J. (2018) Variability and Correlation of Renewable Energy Sources in the Portuguese Electrical System. Energy for Sustainable Development, 42, 64-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.10.005

[9]   Vinel, A. and Mortaz, E. (2019) Optimal Pooling of Renewable Energy Sources with a Risk-Averse Approach: Implications for US Energy Portfolio. Energy Policy, 132, 928-939.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.051

[10]   Ramos, D.S., Camargo, L.A.S., Guarnier, E. and Witzler, L.T. (2013) Minimizing Market Risk by Trading Hydro-Wind Portfolio: A Complementarity Approach. 10th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), Stockholm, 27-31 May 2013, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2013.6607300

[11]   Birge, J.R. and Louveaux, F. (1997) Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer, New York, 420.

[12]   Conejo, A.J., Carrión, M. and Morales, J. (2010) Decision Making under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science 153, Springer Science + Business Media, Berlin, 540.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7421-1

[13]   Shapiro, A., Tekaya, W., Costa, J.P. and Soares, M.P. (2013) Risk Neutral and Risk Averse Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 224, 375-391.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.022

[14]   Mummey, J.F.C., Ramos, D.S., Sauer, I.L. and Yeh, W.G. (2017) Important Issues and Results When Considering the Stochastic Representation of Wind Power Plants in a Generation Optimization Model: An Application to the Large Brazilian Interconnected Power System. Energy and Power Engineering, 11, 320-332.
https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2019.118020

[15]   Witzler, L.T., Ramos, D.S., Camargo, L.A.S. and Guarnier, E. (2016) Reconstruction of Wind Generation Historical Series Aiming at the Analysis of Energy Complementarity: Methodology and Applications. 13th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), Porto, 6-9 June 2016, 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2016.7521324

[16]   Molin, S. (2019) Hands-On Data Analysis with Pandas. 3rd Edition, Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham.

[17]   National Center for Atmospheric Research. NCAR, Colorado, USA.
https://ncar.ucar.edu

[18]   Vortex. Barcelona, Spain.
https://vortexfdc.com

[19]   Burton, T., Sharpe, D., Jenkins, N. and Bossanyi, E. (2001) Wind Energy Handbook. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
https://doi.org/10.1002/0470846062

[20]   Rockfellar, R.T. and Uryasev, S.P. (2000) Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. The Journal of Risk, 2, 21-41.
https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2000.038

[21]   Tekay, W. (2013) Risk Neutral and Risk Averse Approaches to Multistage Stochastic Programming with Applications to Hydrothermal Operation Planning Problems. PhD Thesis, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

[22]   Camargo, L.A.S. (2015) Commercialization and Investment Strategy, with Emphasis on Renewable Energy, Supported by Specialized Optimization Models for Stochastic Risk X Return Assessment. Ph.D. Thesis, Polytechnique School University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo. (In Portuguese)

[23]   CCEE (2020) The Chamber of Commercialization of Electric Energy.
http://ccee.org.br

 
 
Top