Back
 AS  Vol.11 No.8 , August 2020
Genetic Diversity in the Semi-Arid Grown Cowpea(Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)Accessions Using Morphological and Molecular Characterization
Abstract: Assessment of genetic diversity of the indigenous crop accessions is extremely important for breeders to identify potential parents in cross-breeding programs. Fourteen cowpea accessions collected from different parts of Sudan were used for characterization at morphological and molecular levels. The seeds of the accessions were sown in the field using a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Sixteen morphological descriptors (9 qualitative and 7 quantitative) and 20 Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers were used for characterization of the accessions. The results of morphological data revealed considerable variability within and between state’s accessions. Some morphological traits revealed similarity between accessions from different states. Among the 20 RAPD markers used, 18 were polymorphic. A total of 379 polymorphic patterns were generated; polymorphic information content (PIC) ranged from 0.63 to 0.98 with an average of 0.9. The number of fragment detected ranged from 2 for OPL-11 to 51 for OPY-2 with an average of 26.06/primer and 27.07/genotype. One to five (1 - 5) unique fragments of different sizes were detected for particular accessions, which may provide a valuable resource for breeding superior cowpea cultivars in Sudan and other semi-arid zones. Genetic similarity was ranged from 0.02 to 0.47 with an average of 0.25. Highest genetic similarity was between genotypes HSD-2966 and HSD-2967 and between genotypes HSD-5131 and HSD-5627 and the lowest was between HSD-5131 and HSD-5861 followed by that between HSD-2976 and HSD-29130 accessions. The study recommends the combination of morphological and molecular data for more efficient genetic diversity assessment and management.
Cite this paper: Elteib, A. and Gasim, S. (2020) Genetic Diversity in the Semi-Arid Grown Cowpea(Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)Accessions Using Morphological and Molecular Characterization. Agricultural Sciences, 11, 692-706. doi: 10.4236/as.2020.118044.
References

[1]   Khan, T., Reza, H., Khan, A., Haque, S., Islam, S. and Khan, B. (2015) Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cowpea by RAPD Markers. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 10, 459-465.

[2]   Carvalho, M., Amatriaın, M., Castro, I., Lino-Neto, T., Matos, M., Egea, M., Rosa, E., Close, T. and Carnide, V. (2017) Genetic Diversity and Structure of Iberian Peninsula Cowpeas Compared to World-Wide Cowpea Accessions Using High-Density SNP Markers. BMC Genome, 18, Article No. 891.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4295-0

[3]   Khosro, M., Mohammed, B. and Ali, A. (2017) Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Germplasm Using Morphological and Molecular Characterisation. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 3, Article ID: 1327092.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2017.1327092

[4]   Vu, N., Arya, K., Panchta, R. and Pahuja, S. (2016) Studies on Meteroglyph Analysis in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Forage Research, 41, 255-258.

[5]   Serdeczny, O., Waters, E. and Chan, S. (2016) Non-Economic Loss and Damage in the Context of Climate Change. German Development Institute Discussion Paper 3/2016 Bonn, Bonn, 1-29.

[6]   Tushar, J.A., Gajera, H.P., Savaliya, D.D., Domadiya, R.K., Patel, S.V. and Golakiya, B.A. (2014) Molecular Diversity Analysis of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Genotypes Determined by ISSR and RAPD Markers. International Journal of Agriculture, environment and Biotechnology, 7, 269-276.
https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2014.00244.7

[7]   Doyle, J.J. and. Doyle, J.L. (1990) Isolation of DNA from Fresh Tissue. Focus, 12, 13-15.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2419362

[8]   Utz, H. (1997) Computer Program for Statistical Analysis for Plant Breeding Experiments. Version 2N. Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim.

[9]   Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A. (1984) Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition, Jone Wiley & Sons, New York, 146-184.

[10]   Anderson, J.A., Churchill, G.A., Autrique, J.E., Tanksley, S.D. and Sorrells, M.E. (1993) Optimizing Parental Selection for Genetic Linkage Maps. Genome, 36, 181-186.
https://doi.org/10.1139/g93-024

[11]   Adewale, B.D., Adeigbe, O.O. and Aremu, C.O. (2011) Genetic Distance and Diversity among Some Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp) Genotype. International Journal of Research in Plant Science, 1, 9-14.

[12]   Viswanatha, K.P. and Yogeesh, L.N. (2017) Genetic Variation and Morphological Diversity in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 2, 176-180.

[13]   Doumbia, I., Akromah, R. and Asibuo, J. (2013) Comparative Study of Cowpea Germplasms Diversity from Ghana and Mali Using Morphological Characteristics. Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 1, 139-147.

[14]   Noubissié, J., Youmbi, Y., Njintang, N., Alladoum, A., Nguimbou, M. and Bell, J. (2011) Genetic Architecture of Some Leaf Yield and Quality Attributes in Dual-Purpose Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1, 400-413.
https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2011/646

[15]   Ajayi, A.T., Adekola, M.O., Taiwo, B.H. and Azuh, V.O. (2014) Character Expression and Differences in Yield Potential of Ten Genotypes of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). International Journal of Plant Research, 4, 63-71.

[16]   Eddea, P.A. and. Amatobi, C.I. (2003) Seed Coat Has No Value in Protecting Cowpea Seed against Attack by Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Journal of Stored Products Research, 39, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(02)00011-5

[17]   Cobbinah, F.A., Addo-Quaye, A.A. and Asante, I.K. (2011) Characterization, Evaluation and Selection of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (l.) walp) Accessions with Desirable Traits from Eight Regions of Ghana. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 6, 1990-6145.

[18]   Udensi, O.U., Okon, E.A., Kpeme, E.V., Onung, O.O. and Ogban, F.U. (2016) Assessing the Genetic Diversity in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) Accessions Obtained from IITA, Nigeria Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 10, 12-22.
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijpbg.2016.12.22

[19]   Ba, S., Pasquet, S. and Gepts, P. (2004) Genetic Diversity in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Walp) as Revealed by RAPD Markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 51, 539-550.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRES.0000024158.83190.4e

[20]   Prasanthi, L., Geetha, B., Jyothi, N. and Reddy, K. (2012) Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) Genotypes Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Current Biotica, 6, 22-31.

[21]   Gajera, H.P., Domadiya, R.K., Patel, S.V. and Golakiya, B.A. (2014) Appraisal of RAPD and ISSR Markers for Genetic Diversity Analysis among Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Genotypes. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 17, 79-88.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-013-0062-1

[22]   Weir, B.S. (1990) Genetic Data Analysis: Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland.

 
 
Top