ENG  Vol.12 No.7 , July 2020
Maximum Magnitude of Seismicity Induced by a Hydraulic Fracturing Stage in a Shale Reservoir: Insights from Numerical Simulations
Abstract: A key unknown limiting assessment of risk posed by inducing anomalous seismicity during hydraulic fracturing is the potential maximum magnitude of an event. To provide insights into the variation in maximum magnitude that can be induced by a hydraulic fracturing stage, worst-case scenarios were simulated in 2D using coupled hydro-geomechanical models. The sensitivity of the magnitude to the hydro-geomechanical properties of the fault and matrix rock were quantitatively compared through parametric analysis. Our base model predicts a maximum event with moment magnitude (Mw) 4.31 and Mw values range from 3.97 to 4.56 for the series of simulations. The highest magnitude is predicted for the model with a longer fault and the lowest magnitude for the model with a smaller Young’s modulus. For our models, the magnitude is most sensitive to changes in the Young’s modulus and length of the fault and least sensitive to changes in the initial reservoir pressure (i.e. pore pressure) and the Poisson’s ratio.
Cite this paper: Bustin, A. and Bustin, R. (2020) Maximum Magnitude of Seismicity Induced by a Hydraulic Fracturing Stage in a Shale Reservoir: Insights from Numerical Simulations. Engineering, 12, 516-533. doi: 10.4236/eng.2020.127036.

[1]   de Pater, C.J. and Baisch, S. (2011) Geomechanical Study of Bowland Shale Seismicity.

[2]   Bustin, R.M. and Bustin, A.M.M. (2012) Induced Seismicity in the Bowland Basin, during Completion of the Preese Hall Shale Gas/Oil Well. SPE/SGE Workshop on Injection Induced Seismicity, Broomfield, September 2012.

[3]   Clarke, H., Eisner, L., Styles, P. and Turner, P. (2014) Felt Seismicity Associated with Shale Gas Hydraulic Fracturing: The First Documented Example in Europe. Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 8308-8314.

[4]   Hallo, M.I., Oprsal, L., Eisner, L. and Ali, M.Y. (2014) Prediction of Magnitude of the Largest Potentially Induced Seismic Event. Journal of Seismology, 18, 421-431.

[5]   McGarr, A. (2014) Maximum Magnitude Earthquakes Induced by Fluid Injection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119, 1008-1019.

[6]   McGarr, A. and Barbour, A.J. (2018) Injection-Induced Moment Release Can Also Be Aseismic. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 5344-5351.

[7]   Shapiro, S.A., Kruger, O.S., Dinske, C. and Langenbruch, C. (2011) Magnitudes of Induced Earthquakes and Geometric Scales of Fluid-Stimulated Rock Volumes. Geophysics, 76, WC55-WC63.

[8]   Galis, M., Ampuero, J.P., Mai, P.M. and Cappa, F. (2017) Induced Seismicity Provides Insight into Why Earthquake Ruptures Stop. Science Advances, 3, eaap7528.

[9]   Maurer, J. and Segall, P. (2018) Magnitudes of Induced Earthquakes in Low-Stress Environments. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108, 1087-1106.

[10]   Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2011) UDEC (Universal Distinct Element Code), Version 5.0. ICG, Minneapolis.

[11]   Cundall, P.A. (1971) A Compute Model for Simulating Progressive Large Scale Movements in Blocky Rock Systems. Proceedings of the Symposium of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, Nancy, Vol. 1, II-8.

[12]   Hanks, T.C. and Kanamori, H. (1979) Moment Magnitude Scale. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, 2348-2350.

[13]   Aki, K. (1966) Generation and Propagation of G Waves from the Niigata Earthquake of June 14, 1964. Part 2. Estimation of Earthquake Moment, Released Energy and Stress-Strain Drop from G Wave Spectrum. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, 44, 73-88.

[14]   Rutqvist, J., Cappa, F., Rinaldi, A.P. and Godano, M. (2014) Dynamic Modeling of Injection-Induced Fault Reactivation and Ground Motion and Impact on Surface Structures and Human Perception. Energy Procedia, 63, 3379-3389.

[15]   Rutqvist, J., Rinaldi, A.P., Cappa, F. and Moridis, G.J. (2015) Modeling of Fault Activation and Seismicity by Injection Directly into a Fault Zone Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing of Shale-Gas Reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 127, 377-386.