Daily oral health care has been advocated as the most effective way for maintain oral hygiene. Flossing has long been considered an indispensable part of an effective oral hygiene routine. It can remove plaque or control its accumulation . Dental plaque is one of the etiologic factors in the development of chronic periodontal disease . Chronic periodontal disease is a polygenetic disease that can lead to gingival bleeding and tooth loss when left untreated   . For this reason, the American Dental Association recommends flossing at least once a day to help remove plaque .
Though daily flossing has been recommended to prevent chronic periodontal disease, the use of dental floss as an adjunct oral hygiene aid is not encouraged throughout the world, and a large proportion of young subjects floss their teeth less than that recommended or not at all . Among university students, Rimondini et al. found that 92% of their samples brushed at least twice a day, while only 15% of these samples flossed their teeth daily . The 2014 Delta Dental Oral Health and Well Being Survey reported that 41% of Americans floss at least once daily, while 20% never floss . That is, people fail to sufficiently adopt or maintain this oral habit .
The “oral health behavior” describes oral hygiene habits as tooth brushing, the use of dental floss, and regular dental visits . However, few studies have evaluated adolescents’ compliance with flossing . One study demonstrated that adolescents are positively correlated to flossing behavior and other health, cleanliness and social behaviors . Equipping medical students to be agents of using floss is beneficial not only for oral health promotion, but also to patient education. Hence, a survey of the dental floss behavior of medical students is required to underpin the development and targeting of public health interventions.
The aim of the present study was to determine the severity of floss based on basic demographic characteristics of medical students in Inner Mongolia Medical University in 2017, which would be helpful to plan for corrective measures.
The present study was conducted in the Inner Mongolia Medical University campus of China in 2017. The participant’s major including Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine. Chinese Medicine included Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chinese Pharmacy, Acupuncture and Massage. Western Medicine included Clinical Medicine, Stomatology, Anesthesiology, Medicine Imaging, Medicine Testing Technology, Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy. In this university, the duration of undergraduate study is 4 or 5 years. Some of these students have internships in the final or last two years of their courses, which are conducted off campus. Students who were completing internships and living off campus were not included in the investigation.
The investigators distributed the questionnaires, the participants answered the questionnaires, and the field workers ensured that the classroom was silent to allow students to work in private and avoid confounding their answers through discussion with their peers. The participants returned the completed questionnaire to the investigators. Some of them checked the questionnaires, while others counted the number of questionnaires. Finally, the investigators placed the questionnaires in a sealed envelope and recorded the survey time, survey sites, respondents and investigators. The protocol for the research project has been approved by Inner Mongolia Medical University Ethics Committee of the institution within which the work was undertaken.
The participants were interviewed for demographic characteristics, including age, gender, ethnicity, residence place and faculty, and for flossing frequency, including 1 - 3 times per day, 4 - 6 times per week, 1 - 3 times per week, 1 - 3 times per month, and less than once a month or never. Non-flossors responded regarding the reasons for not flossing, including I do not know what a floss is, I do not know how to use it, I am affected by people around, and I do not want to use it. Ethnicity was classified as Han, Mongolian and other ethnicities, which included all other ethnicities, excluding Han and Mongolian. The residence place was classified as urban, which included cities and towns, and rural. A logical test was also set up. The participants answered question 18, while question 17 answers of F were considered as logical error. Then, all errors were screened out from the questionnaire.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The X2-test was used to examine the differences in using floss among various basic demographic characteristics. Data were entered using EpiDate (Version 3.1). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows Version 13.0, with a significance level of P < 0.05.
A total of 3501 data were collected account for 97% from 10 different faculties, 1 - 3 years aged 19.77 ± 1.28. The effective data were 3481, the percentage of effective rate accounted for 99.43%. Table 1 presents the floss prevalence by demographic characteristics. The floss prevalence was 17.21%, for males 19.49%, which was higher by 3.59% than in females. The floss prevalence in other ethnicities was higher by 5.35% than in the Han ethnic. The floss prevalence was lower by 5.72% for students living in rural areas, when compared to students living in urban areas. However, there was no significant difference in flossing prevalence between Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine.
Table 2 presents the reasons for non-flossing participants. The largest proportion
Table 1. Flossing prevalence by demographic characteristics for medical faculties in Inner Mongolia Medical University 2017.
Table 2. Reasons for non-flossing for medical faculties in Inner Mongolia Medical University 2017.
that account for non-flossing are those who answered I do not know what a floss is (40.60%), and this was followed by non-flossors who answered, I do not want to use it (36.19%). The proportion of non-flossing for females who answered, I do not know what a floss is, was higher by 12.50%, when compared to females who answered, I do not want to use it. The highest proportion who answered I do not know what a floss is came from Han subjects (40.68%). The largest proportion of non-flossing subjects came from the rural area, who answered I do not know what a floss is, while in the urban area, the largest proportion came from those who answered, I do not want to use it. The proportion of non-flossing in rural areas, who answered, I do not know what a floss is, was higher by 23.00%, when compared with those who answered, I do not want to use it.
Table 3 presents that the proportion of flossing frequency between males and females. Among these, the largest proportion of answered flossing frequency was less than 35.79%. The largest proportion of answered flossing frequency for male was “1 - 3 times per day” (28.40%). The largest proportion of answered flossing frequency for females was once a month (43.66%).
Figure 1 shows the prevalence of flossing for various faculties students. The Clinical Pharmacy Faculty has the lowest prevalence of flossing (11.11%). The Chinese Pharmacy Faculty has the highest prevalence (20.00%), followed by the Acupuncture and Massage Faculty (19.07%) and Medicine Imaging faculty (18.58%).
The present study indicated that most of the students do not use floss to clean
Table 3. Flossing frequency for medical faculties in Inner Mongolia Medical University 2017.
Figure 1. Prevalence of flossing for medical faculties in Inner Mongolia Medical University 2017.
interdental spaces. This is far below that for dental students in India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), Yemen and United Arab Emirates (UAE) (38.1%), and lower than that in Scandinavian and Polish medical students (56.29%)  . However, this was higher than junior and third-year medical students in Sichuan University, China (3.5% and 6.4%, respectively) . Even for students who use floss, more than one-third of students use floss less than once a month, which is close to “never”, and is far from the recommended frequency, which is flossing for 2 - 4 days a week . Even if the floss prevalence is higher than that in medical students in China, this remains very low. This is not only true in Inner Mongolia, but also in China.
The present flossing prevalence in rural areas is lower than that in urban areas, which is similar to a Colombian study . Although the prevalence in urban areas was higher than those in rural areas, both did not reach the level of most countries. The present study further analyzed the reasons for non-flossing. The majority of non-flossing subject do not use floss because they do not know what a floss is or do not want to use it. In rural areas, more than half of non-flossing students do not know what a floss is. The lack of publicity and education  are the main reasons the lead to the low flossing prevalence in China. Although the dental knowledge of floss is significantly associated with dental clinic as the source , and floss knowledge is positively associated with use of dental floss , this just played a supporting role in China. In urban areas, the main reason for non-flossing was that they do not want to use it, which means that they know what a floss is, but have an insufficient subjective consciousness of it.
The present study found that the use of floss in males was more frequent than those in females, not only for the total number of prevalence, but also for the frequency that reached the recommended level. This indicates that male students were more willing to take oral health measures than female students. This result is contrary to most studies worldwide    , and the same gender difference was not found in the present study.
Medical students will be the health professionals in the future, and they are expected to possess accurate oral health knowledge and behavior of dental floss. Therefore, it is essential to improve their oral health knowledge and behavior of dental floss, which are of great significance to society  . Present efforts should be encouraged in school medical students, especially in dental students.
In summary, the floss prevalence in medical students in Inner Mongolia Medical University is very low, and the prevalence in rural areas is lower than that in urban areas. The reason is that in rural areas, students do not know what a floss is, while urban students do not want to use it. Males not only account for the total number of prevalence, but also the greater frequency, when compared to females.
Role of Funding Source
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia in China (No. 2016MS0821) and the Inner Mongolia Medical University Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program Training Project Autonomous Region (No. 2018101320027).
*Cong Chen, Lijuan Shang, Li Jiang contributed equally to this paper.
 Cepeda, M.S., Weinstein, R., Blacketer, C. and Lynch, M.C. (2017) Association of Flossing/Inter-Dental Cleaning and Periodontitis in Adults. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44, 866-871.
 Knight, E.T., Liu, J., Seymour, G.J., Faggion, C.M. and Cullinan, M.P. (2016) Risk Factors That May Modify the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in Periodontal Diseases. Periodontology 2000, 71, 22-51.
 American Dental Association (2015) Mouth Healthy. Flossing (Internet).
 Schüz, B., Sniehotta, F.F., Wiedemann, A. and Seemann, R. (2006) Adherence to a Daily Flossing Regimen in University Students: Effects of Planning When, Where, How and What to Do in the Face of Barriers. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 33, 612-619.
 Rimondini, L., Zolfanelli, B., Bernardi, F. and Bez, C. (2001) Self-Preventive Oral Behavior in an Italian University Student Population. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 28, 207-211.
 Fleming, E.B., Nguyen, D., Afful, J., Carroll, M.D. and Woods, P.D. (2018) Prevalence of Daily Flossing among Adults by Selected Risk Factors for Periodontal Disease—United States, 2011-2014. Journal of Periodontology, 89, 933-939.
 Gholami, M., Knoll, N. and Schwarzer, R. (2015) A Brief Self-Regulatory Intervention Increases Dental Flossing in Adolescent Girls. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 645-651.
 Rahman, B. and Al Kawas, S. (2013) The Relationship between Dental Health Behavior, Oral Hygiene and Gingival Status of Dental Students in the United Arab Emirates. European Journal of Dentistry, 7, 22-27.
 Mattos-Silveira, J., Matos-Lima, B.B., Oliveira, T.A., et al. (2017) Why Do Children and Adolescents Neglect Dental Flossing? European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 18, 45-50.
 Halawany, H.S., Abraham, N.B., Jacob, V. and Al-Maflehi, N. (2015) The Perceived Concepts of Oral Health Attitudes and Behaviors of Dental Students from Four Asian Countries. The Saudi Journal for Dental Research, 6, 79-85.
 Rodakowska, E., Kierklo, A. and Jamiołkowski, J. (2016) Self-Reported Oral Health Behaviour among Scandinavian and Polish Medical Students Studying in Poland. Central European Journal of Public Health, 24, 68-75.
 Yao, K., Yao, Y., Shen, X., Lu, C. and Guo, Q. (2019) Assessment of the Oral Health Behavior, Knowledge and Status among Dental and Medical Undergraduate Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Oral Health, 19, Article No. 26.
 Jaramillo, J.A., Jaramillo, F., Kador, I., et al. (2013) A Comparative Study of Oral Health Attitudes and Behavior Using the Hiroshima University-Dental Behavioral Inventory (HU-DBI) between Dental and Civil Engineering Students in Colombia. Journal of Oral Science, 55, 23-28.
 Taniguchi-Tabata, A., Ekuni, D., Mizutani, S., et al. (2017) Associations between Dental Knowledge, Source of Dental Knowledge and Oral Health Behavior in Japanese University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS ONE, 12, e0179298.
 Khan, K., Ruby, B., Goldblatt, R.S., Schensul, J.J. and Reisine, S. (2014) A Pilot Study to Assess Oral Health Literacy by Comparing a Word Recognition and Comprehension Tool. BMC Oral Health, 14, Article No. 135.
 Mohammadi, T.M., Malekmohammadi, M., Hajizamani, H.R. and Mahani, S.A. (2018) Oral Health Literacy and Its Determinants among Adults in Southeast Iran. European Journal of Dentistry, 12, 439-442.
 Lang, W.P., Ronis, D.L. and Farghaly, M.M. (1995) Preventive Behaviors as Correlates of Periodontal Health Status. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 55, 10-17.