JSS  Vol.7 No.2 , February 2019
Empirical Analysis on the Learning Status of Chinese College Students
Author(s) Yan Dai
According to the empirical analysis on the present learning status of undergraduates from the central region of China, Chinese college students learning is dominated by instrumental rationality instead of the value rationality. They pay more attention to the evaluation results of knowledge, while ignoring the understanding and application of the knowledge. They attach great importance to the external evaluation and ignore self-growth. They show inadequate initiative, enthusiasm and passion in learning but great interest in Internet funs and games. These problems require the Chinese colleges and universities make positive adjustments in faculty assessment and students’ academic evaluation, the coordination of internal and external educational resources, and the involvement of information technology in classroom teaching, so as to solve the structural inconsistency in China’s labor market.
Cite this paper
Dai, Y. (2019) Empirical Analysis on the Learning Status of Chinese College Students. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 85-95. doi: 10.4236/jss.2019.72006.
[1]   Zhang, X.Y. (2016) The Study on Features of the Learning Ability of Chinese College Students. Journal of Education Science of Hunan Normal University, No. 2, 95-102.

[2]   Crick, R.D., Broadfoot, P. and Claxton, G. (2004) Developing an Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory: The ELLI Project. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 247-272.

[3]   Land, S. and Jonassen, D. (2012) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813799

[4]   Ryan, T.A. (1970) Intentional Behavior. Ronald Press, New York.

[5]   Rothkopf, E.Z. and Billington, M. (1979) Goal-Guided Learning from Text: Inferring a Descriptive Processing Model from Inspection Times and Eye Movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 310-327.

[6]   Locke, E.A. and Bryan, J.F. (1968) Goal Setting as a Determinant of the Effect of Knowledge of Score on Performance. American Journal of Psychology, No. 3 398-406.

[7]   Wood, R. and Locke, E.A. (1990) Goal Setting and Strategy Effects on Complex Tasks. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 73.

[8]   Yang, X. (2004) A Review of the Researches on the Theory of Goal Setting. Psychological Science, 27, 153-155.

[9]   Mcclelland, D. (1973) Testing for Competence Rather than for “Intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.

[10]   Graunke, S. and Woosley, S. (2005) An Exploration of the Factors that Affect the Academic Success of College Sophomores. College Student Journal, 39, 376.

[11]   Daniel, H. (2011) Drive: The Surprising Truth about What Motivates us. Riverhead Hardcover, New York.

[12]   Wang, Y. (2011) University Curriculum: Necessity and Possibility to Develop Students’ Personal Knowledge. Journal of Higher Education, 32, 64-75.

[13]   Whitehead, A. (1929) The Aims of Education and Other Essays. Free Press, New York.