JHEPGC  Vol.5 No.1 , January 2019
How a Kerr-Newman Black Hole Leads to Criteria about If Gravity Is Quantum Due to Questions on If (Δt)5 + A1 ⋅ (Δt)2 + A2 = 0 Is Solvable
ABSTRACT
Note, in a prior paper, we ascertained physics thought experiment configuration for a black hole, which may exist say at least up to 10-1 seconds. Our idea was to experimentally provide a test bed as to early universe gravitational theories. In doing so, we as follow up to that black hole paper come up with a criteria as to Quintic polynomial with regards to Δt which is the interval of time for which we can measure (down to Planck time) the production of Gravitational waves and gravitons, from an induced Kerr-Newman black hole. In doing so we access what is given in an AdS/CFT rendition of black hole entropy written by Pires which gives an input strategy as to how to relate Δt to a (Δt)5 + A1 ⋅ (Δt)2 + A2 =0 Quintic polynomial which has only a few combinations which may be exactly solvable. We find that A2 has a number, n of presumed produced gravitons, in the time interval Δt and that both A1 and A2 have an Ergosphere area, due to the induced Kerr-Newman black hole. Finally, we extract information via the use of the Uncertainty Principle, as to ΔEΔt ≥ ℏ with ΔEE0mc2, so if we have a mass m, we will be able to extract Δt. This due to very complete arguments as to Kerr-Newman black holes, which when we have entropy, due to the Infinite quantum statistics argument given by Ng, leads to a counting algorithm, of n gravitons, which is proportional to entropy during which is then leading directly to fixing Δt directly via us of (Δt)5 + A1 ⋅ (Δt)2 + A2 =0, with the Quintic evaluated according to Blair K. Spearman and Kenneth S. Williams, in the Rocky mountain journal of mathematics, as of 1996. i.e. if this polynomial, as by our described Quintic polynomial, in Δt, (Δt)5 + A1 ⋅ (Δt)2 + A2 =0 is exactly solvable, then our Kerr Newman black hole is leading to quantum gravity. Otherwise, gravity in its foundations with respect to the Kerr Newman blackhole is classical to semi classical. In its characterization of gravity. Note that specifically, we state that this paper is modeling the creation of an actual Kerr Newman black hole via laser physics, or possibly by other means and that our determination of Δt as being solved, exactly by (Δt)5 + A1 ⋅ (Δt)2 + A2 =0 is our way of determining if the Kerr Newman black hole leads to quantum gravity.
Cite this paper
Beckwith, A. (2019) How a Kerr-Newman Black Hole Leads to Criteria about If Gravity Is Quantum Due to Questions on If (Δt)5 + A1 ⋅ (Δt)2 + A2 = 0 Is Solvable. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 5, 35-40. doi: 10.4236/jhepgc.2019.51002.
References
[1]   Liviro, M. (2005) The Equation That Couldn’t Be Solved. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, New York.

[2]   Baker, A. An Introduction to Galois Theory.
http://www.maths.gla.ac.uk/~ajb/dvi-ps/Galois.pdf

[3]   Higashino, T. Galois Theory: Polynomials of Degree 5 and Up.
http://web.williams.edu/Mathematics/sjmiller/public_html/hudson/higashino_galoistheory.pdf

[4]   Herstein, I. (1999) Abstract Algebra. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

[5]   Spearman, B. and Williams, K. (1998) On Solvable Quintics X5 + ax + b and X5 + ax2 + b. Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 28.
http://people.math.carleton.ca/~williams/papers/pdf/206.pdf

[6]   Beckwith, A. How a Laser Physics Induced Kerr-Newman Black Hole Can Release Gravitational Waves without Igniting the Black Hole Bomb (Explosion of a Mini Black Hole in a Laboratory).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867961_HOW_A_Laser_Physics_Induced_KERR-NEWMAN_BLACK_HOLE_CAN_RELEASE_GRAVITATIONAL_WAVES_without_igniting_the_Black_Hole_bomb_explosion_of_a_mini_black_hole_in_a_laboratory

[7]   Voronin, S.M. (1975) Theorem on the Universality of the Riemann Zeta Function. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Matem., 39, 475-486. (Reprinted in Math. USSR Izv. (1975) 9, 443-445.)

[8]   Ng, J. Spacetime Foam: From Entropy and Holography to Infinite Statistics and Nonlocality.
https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.2962

[9]   Pickett, C. and Zunda, J. (2000) Areas of the Event Horizon and Stationary Limit Surface for a Kerr Black Hole. American Journal of Physics, 68, 746-748.
https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0001053
https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19536

[10]   Pieres, A. (2014) AdS/CFT Correspondence in Condensed Matter. IOP Concise Physics, A. Morgan & Claypool Publication, San Rafael.

[11]   Pieres, A. AdS/CFT Correspondence in Condensed Matter.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1006.5838.pdf

[12]   Davidson, E.R. (1965) On Derivations of the Uncertainty Principle. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 42, 1461.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1696139

[13]   Ringbauer, M., Biggerstaff, D.N., Broome, M.A., Fedrizzi, A., Branciard, C. and White, A.G. (2014) Experimental Joint Quantum Measurements with Minimum Uncertainty. Physical Review Letters, 112, 020401.

[14]   Park, M.-I. (2007) Thermodynamics of Exotic Black Holes, Negative Temperature, and Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy. Physics Letters, B647, 472-476.
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0602114

 
 
Top