JDAIP  Vol.6 No.2 , May 2018
Signal Analysis of the Climate: Correlation, Delay and Feedback
Author(s) Peter Stallinga
One of the ingredients of anthropogenic global warming is the existence of a large correlation between carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere and the temperature. In this work we analyze the original time-series data that led to the new wave of climate research and test the two hypotheses that might explain this correlation, namely the (more commonly accepted and well-known) greenhouse effect (GHE) and the less-known Henry’s Law (HL). This is done by using the correlation and the temporal features of the data. Our conclusion is that of the two hypotheses the greenhouse effect is less likely, whereas the Henry’s Law hypothesis can easily explain all effects. First the proportionality constant in the correlation is correct for HL and is about two orders of magnitude wrong for GHE. Moreover, GHE cannot readily explain the concurring methane signals observed. On the temporal scale, we see that GHE has difficulty in the apparent negative time lag between cause and effect, whereas in HL this is of correct sign and magnitude, since it is outgasing of gases from oceans. Introducing feedback into the GHE model can overcome some of these problems, but it introduces highly instable and chaotic behavior in the system, something that is not observed. The HL model does not need feedback.
Cite this paper
Stallinga, P. (2018) Signal Analysis of the Climate: Correlation, Delay and Feedback. Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 6, 30-45. doi: 10.4236/jdaip.2018.62003.
[1]   King, A. and Schneider, B. (1991) The First Global Revolution. A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome. Orient Longman, Hyderabad, 75.

[2]   Ereaut, G. and Segnit, N. (2006) Warm Words: How We Are Telling the Climate Story and Can We Tell It Better? Institute for Public Policy Research, London, England.

[3]   Frank, D.C., et al. (2010) Ensemble reconstruction Constraints on the Global Carbon Cycle Sensitivity to Climate. Nature, 463, 527-530.

[4]   Hieb, M. (2007) http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

[5]   Rothman, L.S., et al. (2005) The HITRAN 2004 Molecular Spectroscopic Database. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer, 96, 139-204.

[6]   Lindzen. R.S. and Choi, Y.-S. (2009) On the Determination of Climate Feedbacks from ERBE Data. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L16705.

[7]   Al-Anezi, K., et al. (2008) Parameters Affecting the Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Seawater at the Conditions Encountered in MSF Desalination Plants. Desalination, 222, 548-571.

[8]   Stallinga, P. and Khmelinskii, I. (2014) Application of Signal Analysis to the Climate. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, Article ID: 161530.

[9]   Indermühle, A., Monnin, E., Stauffer, B., Stocker, T.F. and Wahlen, M. (2000) Atmospheric CO2 Concentration from 60 to 20 Kyr BP from the Taylor Dome Ice Core, Antarctica. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 735-738.

[10]   Fischer, H., Wahlen, M., Smith, J., Mastroianni, D. and Deck, B. (1999) Ice Core Records of Atmospheric CO2 around the Last Three Glacial Terminations. Science, 283, 1712-1714.

[11]   Nydal, R. and Lovseth, K. (1983) Tracing Bomb 14C in the Atmosphere 1962-1980. Journal of Geophysical Research, 88, 3621-3642.

[12]   Levin, I., et al. (2010) Observations and Modelling of the Global Distribution and Long-Term Trend of Atmospheric 14CO2. Tellus, 62, 26-46.

[13]   Essenhigh, R.H. (2009) Potential Dependence of Global Warming on the Residence Time (RT) in the Atmosphere of Anthropogenically Sourced Carbon Dioxide. Energy & Fuels, 23, 2773-2784.

[14]   van der Ent, R.J. and Tuinenburg, O.A. (2016) The Residence Time of Water in the Atmosphere Revisited. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 779-790.

[15]   Cawley, G.C. (2011) On the Atmospheric Residence Time of Anthropogenically Sourced Carbon Dioxide. Energy & Fuels, 25, 5503-5513.

[16]   Stallinga, P. and Khmelinskii, I. (2014) The Scientific Method in Contemporary (Climate) Research. Energy & Environment, 25, 137-146.