PSYCH  Vol.9 No.1 , January 2018
Conceptualizing and Measuring Group Openness and Cohesion as Dimensions of Group Personality
Groups exhibit behavioral consistencies similar to individuals, such as making more or less bold decisions or struggling more or less frequently. However, previous research findings focus only on specific dimensions of groups instead of the general structure of group personality. Based on previous research findings on group and team efficiency, we derived two basic dimensions of group personality, group openness and cohesion, representing the group’s outward and inward orientation, respectively. We present the “Group Openness and Cohesion Questionnaire” (GOCQ) as a measure to assess these two group personality dimensions in groups independent of their context. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the proposed two-dimensional structure with good to excellent psychometric properties. Evidence of validity is provided through group age, group size, and by the fact that the ratings reflect team characteristics. In general, the results support the conceptualization of these two basic dimensions of group personality and provide first indications of validity of the presented measure GOCQ.
Cite this paper
Deckers, M. , Altmann, T. and Roth, M. (2018) Conceptualizing and Measuring Group Openness and Cohesion as Dimensions of Group Personality. Psychology, 9, 80-100. doi: 10.4236/psych.2018.91006.
[1]   Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1996). The Team Climate Inventory: Development of the TCI and Its Applications in Teambuilding for Innovativeness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 53-66.

[2]   Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C

[3]   Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166.

[4]   Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.

[5]   Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.

[6]   Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, Process, and Performance in Self-Managed Groups: The Role of Personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.

[7]   Bear, M., Oldham, G. R., Jacobsohn, G. C., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2008). The Personality Composition of Teams and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Team Creative Confidence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 255-282.

[8]   Bjornberg, A., & Nicholson, N. (2007). The Family Climate Scales: Development of a New Measure for Use in Family Business Research. Family Business Review, 20, 229-246.

[9]   Bond, M. H., & Shiu, W. Y. F. (1997). The Relationship between a Group’s Personality Resources and the Two Dimensions of Its Group Process. Small Group Research, 28, 194-217.

[10]   Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Small Group Research, 31, 89-106.

[11]   Carron, A. V., & Spink, K. S. (1995). The Group Size-Cohesion Relationship in Minimal Groups. Small Group Research, 26, 86-105.

[12]   Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.

[13]   Cheng, C., Bartram, T., Karimi, L., & Leggat, S. G. (2013). The Role of Team Climate in the Management of Emotional Labour: Implications for Nurse Retention. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 2812-2825.

[14]   Dang, C. C., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Team Personality: A Dynamic, Contextualized View. Zeitschriftfür Personalpsychologie, 5, 177-185.

[15]   Eys, M. A., Lougheed, T., Bray, S. R., & Carron, A. V. (2009). Development of a Cohesion Questionnaire for Youth: The Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 390-408.

[16]   Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.

[17]   Heslin, R. (1964). Predicting Group Task Effectiveness from Member Characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 248-256.

[18]   Homan, A. C., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Van Knippenberg, D., Ilgen, D. R., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2008). Facing Differences with an Open Mind: Openness to Experience, Salience of Intragroup Differences, and Performance of Diverse Work Groups. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1204-1222.

[19]   Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.

[20]   Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some Differences Make a Difference: Individual Dissimilarity and Group Heterogeneity as Correlates of Recruitment, Promotions, and Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.

[21]   Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1983). Social Interdepedence and Perceived Academic and Personal Support in the Classroom. The Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 77-82.

[22]   Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing Structural Equation Models. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Lang (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 294-317). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

[23]   Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from Controversy. Lessons from the Person-Situation Debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.

[24]   Kurdek, L. A., & Fine, M. A. (1993). The Relation between Family Structure and Young Adolescents’ Appraisal of Family Climate and Parenting Behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 279-290.

[25]   Kurdek, L. A., Fine, M. A., & Sinclair, R. J. (1995). School Adjustment in Sixth Graders: Parenting Transitions, Family Climate, and Peer Norm Effects. Child Development, 66, 430-445.

[26]   Law, T., Lee, K. Y., Ho, F. N., Vlantis, A. C., van Hasselt, A. C., & Tong, M. C. (2012). The Effectiveness of Group Voice Therapy: A Group Climate Perspective. Journal of Voice, 26, e41-e48.

[27]   MacKenzie, K. R., & Tschuschke, V. (1993). Relatedness, Group Work and Outcome in Long-Tern Inpatient Psychotherapy Groups. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 2, 147.

[28]   McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (Vol. 2, pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford Press.

[29]   Patterson, M., West, M., Shackleton, V., Dawson, J., Lawthom, R., Matlis, S. et al. (2005). Validating the Organizational Climate Measure: Links to Managerial Practices, Productivity and Innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379-408.

[30]   Sbicigo, J. B., & Dell’Aglio, D. D. (2012). Family Environment and Psychological Adaption in Adolescents. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25, 615-622.

[31]   Schneider, B. (1987). The People Make the Place. PersonnelPsychology, 40, 437-453.

[32]   Schneider, B. (2000). The Psychological Life of Organizations. In N. Ashkanasy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Culture & Climate (pp. 17-21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[33]   Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the Etiology of Climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19-39.

[34]   Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.

[35]   Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & Oreilly, C. A. (1992). Being Different: Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.

[36]   Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2001). Personality in Teams: Its Relationship to Social Cohesion, Task Cohesion, and Team Performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 97-120.

[37]   Wheelan, S. A. (2009). Group Size, Group Development, and Group Productivity. Small Group Research, 40, 247-262.

[38]   Widmeyer, W., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1990). The Effects of Group Size in Sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 177-190.

[39]   Williams, W. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Group Intelligence: Why Some Groups Are Better than Others. Intelligence, 12, 351-377.

[40]   Zhu, X., Wholey, D. R., Cain, C., & Natafgi, N. (2016). Staff Turnover in Assertive Community Treatment (Act) Teams: The Role of Team Climate. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.