TEL  Vol.7 No.7 , December 2017
How Do Consumers Adopt Imported Products in an Era of Product Overcrowding?
When individuals decide to adopt imported products, they associate these products with one or more places. Thus, consumers are likely to think about the new cultures, ideas, and behaviors associated with these places. When adopting imported products some consumers seek some type of novelty without altering existing decisional and/or behavioral structures whereas other consumers seek novelty to create new consumption situations. Nonetheless, current research has failed to explain how determinant the influence of the product’s place and the process of adopting this product are on consumer’s purchase intention. Therefore, this research analyzes: 1) the influence of the product’s place market development level on consumers’ purchase intention, 2) the process followed by consumers during the adoption of imported products, 3) the effect this process has on consumers’ purchase intention, and 4) the moderating effect of social influence and prior product knowledge on this process. A survey of 491 participants from Mexico and the United States revealed: 1) that significant differences in consumers’ purchase intention are due to the product’s place market development level; 2) that the process followed by consumers during the adoption of imported products represents an explanation chain sequentially described by the consumer attitudes toward that imported product, the behavioral intention to use that imported product, and the selection, evaluation and acceptance of that imported product; 3) that this adoption process has a determinant effect on consumers’ purchase intention for imported products; and 4) that social influence and prior product knowledge also influence consumers purchase intention for imported products. Overall, this research makes a theoretical contribution in three particular ways: 1) by providing an enriched and customized framework to fully understand the product adoption process of consumers when deciding to purchase imported products, 2) by identifying the differences on consumers’ purchase intention due to different levels of market development associated to both, the imported product and the consumer, and 3) by proposing that the product adoption process represents an explanation chain.
Cite this paper
Sahagun, M. and Vasquez-Parraga, A. (2017) How Do Consumers Adopt Imported Products in an Era of Product Overcrowding?. Theoretical Economics Letters, 7, 2019-2039. doi: 10.4236/tel.2017.77137.
[1]   Lambert, J. and Harrell, A. (2010) Imported Product Acceptance When National Origin Is Not an Issue: The Influence of Personal Choice in a Low CETSCALE Environment. Journal of International Business Research, 9, 57-70.

[2]   Wang, C.L., Siu, N.Y.M. and Hui, A.S.Y. (2004) Consumer Decision-Making Styles on Domestic and Imported Brand Clothing. European Journal of Marketing, 38, 239-252.

[3]   Dominelli, L. (2010) Globalization, Contemporary Challenges and Social Work Practice. International Social Work, 53, 599-612.

[4]   Erdogan, B.Z. and Uzkurt, C. (2010) Effects of Ethnocentric Tendency on Consumers’ Perception of Product Attitudes for Foreign and Domestic Products. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 17, 393-406.

[5]   Herche, J. (1992) A Note on the Predictive Validity of the CETSCALE. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 261-264.

[6]   Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance in Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.

[7]   Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading.

[8]   Ozanne, U.B. and Churchill, G.A. (1971) Five Dimensions of the Industrial Adoption Process. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 322-328.

[9]   Hinz, O., Schulze, C. and Takac, C. (2014) New Product Adoption in Social Networks: Why Direction Matters. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2836-2844.

[10]   Lopez, M. and Sicilia, M. (2013) How WOM Marketing Contributes to New Product Adoption: Testing Competitive Communication Strategies. European Journal of Marketing, 47, 1089-1114.

[11]   Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. 4th Edition, The Free Press, New York, 148-150.

[12]   Zenobia, B.A. and Weber, C.M. (2011) Opening the Black Box of Technology Adoption: The Motive-Technology-Belief Framework. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 8, 535-555.

[13]   Bannister, J.P. and Saunders, J.A. (1978) U.K. Consumers’ Attitudes towards Imports: The Measurement of National Stereotype Image. European Journal of Marketing, 12, 562-570.

[14]   Cattin, P., Jolibert, A. and Lohnes, C. (1982) A Cross-Cultural Study of “Made in” Concepts. Journal of International Business Studies, 13, 131-141.

[15]   Sharma, P. (2011) Country of Origin Effects in Developed and Emerging Markets: Exploring the Contrasting Roles of Materialism and Value Consciousness. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 285-306.

[16]   Papadopoulos, N., Heslop, L.A. and Bamossy, G. (1990) A Comparative Image Analysis of Domestic versus Imported Products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 7, 283-294.

[17]   Agbonifoh, B. and Elimimian, J.U. (1999) Attitudes of Developing Counties towards “Country-of-Origin” Products in an Era of Multiple Brands. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11, 97-116.

[18]   Li, D. and Gallup, A.M. (1995) In Search of the Chinese Consumer. China Business Review, 22, 19-22.

[19]   Marcoux, J.S., Filiatrault, P. and Cheron, E. (1997) The Attitudes Underlying Preferences of Young Urban Educated Polish Consumers towards Products Made in Western Countries. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9, 5-29.

[20]   Essoussi, L.H. and Merunka, D. (2007) Consumers’ Product Evaluations in Emerging Markets. Does Country of Design, Country of Manufacture, or Brand Image Matter? International Marketing Review, 24, 409-426.

[21]   Bow, J. and Ford, M. (1993) Indonesia and China: The Retail of Two Cities. Asian Business, 29, 12-14.

[22]   Olsen, J.E., Granzin, K.L. and Biswas, A. (1993) Influencing Consumers’ Selection of Domestic versus Imported Products: Implications for Marketing Based on a Model of Helping Behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 307-321.

[23]   Pauwels, K., Erguncu, S. and Yildirim, G. (2013) Winning Hearts, Minds and Sales: How Marketing Communication Enters the Purchase Process in Emerging and Mature Markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30, 57-68.

[24]   Montano, D.E. and Kasprzyk, D. (2015) Theory of Reasoned Action, Theory of Planned Behavior, and the Integrated Behavioral Model. In: Karen, G., Barbara, R. and Viswanath, K., Eds., Chapter 6 Health Behavior: Theory, Research and Practice book, 5th Edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 95-124.

[25]   Hameed, M.A., Counsell, S. and Swift, S. (2012) A Conceptual Model for the Process of IT Innovation Adoption in Organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29, 358-390.

[26]   Kitchen, P.J. and Panopoulos, A.P. (2010) Online Public Relations: The Adoption Process and Innovation Challenge, a Greek Example. Public Relations Review, 36, 222-229.

[27]   Lambrecht, A., Seim, K. and Tucker, C. (2011) Stuck in the Adoption Funnel: The Effect of Interruptions in the Adoption Process on Usage. Marketing Science, 30, 355-367.

[28]   Hussein, R., Ennew, C. and Kortam, W. (2012) The Adoption of Web-Based Marketing in the Travel and Tourism Industry: An Empirical Investigation in Egypt. Journal of Innovation Management in Small and Medium Enterprises.

[29] (n.d.).

[30]   Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977) Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.

[31]   Andreassen, T.W. and Streukens, S. (2013) Online Complaining: Understanding the Adoption Process and the Role of Individual and Situational Characteristics. Managing Service Quality, 23, 4-24.

[32]   Bobbitt, L.M. and Dabholkar, P.A. (2001) Integrating Attitudinal Theories to Understand and Predict Use of Technology-Based Self-Service: The Internet as an Illustration. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12, 423-450.

[33]   Chen, L., Gillenson, M.L. and Sherrell, D.L. (2002) Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective. Information and Management, 39, 705-719.

[34]   Plewa, C., Troshani, I., Francis, A. and Rampersad, G. (2012) Technology Adoption and Performance Impact in Innovation Domains. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 112, 748-765.

[35]   Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J. and Warshaw, P.R. (1988) The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343.

[36]   Wu, J. and Wang, S. (2005) What Drives Mobile Commerce? An Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Information and Management, 42, 719-729.

[37]   Miniard, P.W. and Cohen, J.B. (1983) Modeling Personal and Normative Influences on Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 169-180.

[38]   Bagozzi, R.P. (1992) The Self-Regulation of Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 178-204.

[39]   Barajas, M. and Agard, B. (2011) Selection of Products Based on Customer Preferences Applying Fuzzy Logic. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 5, 235-242.

[40]   Blumer, H. (1969) Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection. Sociology Quarterly, 10, 275-291.

[41]   Mason, R.S. (1981) Conspicuous Consumption: A Stud y of Exceptional Consumer Behavior. St Martin’s Press, New York.

[42]   Wang, X., Sun, L. and Keh, H.T. (2013) Consumer Responses to Variety in Product Bundles: The Moderating Role of Evaluation Mode. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30, 335-342.

[43]   Johansson, J.K., Douglas, S.P. and Nonaka, I. (1985) Assessing the Impact of Country of Origin on Product Evaluations: A New Methodological Perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 388-396.

[44]   Perera, L.C.R. and Chaminda, J.W.D. (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility and Product Evaluation: The Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 245-256.

[45]   Hult, G.T., Keillor, B.D. and Hightower, R. (2000) Valued Product Attributes in an Emerging Market: A Comparison between French and Malaysian Consumers. Journal of World Business, 35, 206-220.

[46]   Wang, T., Oh, L., Wang, K. and Yuan, Y. (2013) User Adoption and Purchasing Intention after Free Trial: An Empirical Study of Mobile Newspapers. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 11, 189-210.

[47]   Reinders, M.J., Frambach, R.T. and Schoormans, J.P.L. (2010) Using Product Bundling to Facilitate the Adoption Process of Radical Innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 1127-1140.

[48]   Meuter, M.L., Ostrom, A.L., Roundtree, R.I. and Bitner, M.J. (2000) Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64, 50-64.

[49]   Hunt, S.D. (2010) Marketing Theory: Foundations, Controversy, Strategy, Resource-Advantage Theory. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk.

[50]   Summers, T.A., Belleau, B.D. and Xu, Y. (2006) Predicting Purchase Intention of a Controversial Luxury Apparel Product. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10, 405-419.

[51]   Chang, T. and Wildt, A.R. (1994) Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 16-27.

[52]   Fan, Y. and Miao, Y. (2012) Effect of Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumer Purchase Intention: The Perspective of Gender Differences. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 10, 175-181.

[53]   Valente, T.W. and Davis, R.L. (1999) Accelerating the Diffusion of Innovations Using Opinion Leaders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 55-67.

[54]   Yoh, E., Damhors, M.L., Sapp, S. and Laczniak, R. (2003) Consumer Adoption of the Internet: The Case of Apparel Shopping. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 1095-1118.

[55]   Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.

[56]   Park, C.W. and Lessig, P.V. (1981) Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 223-230.

[57]   Rao, A.R. and Monroe, K.B. (1988) The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 253-264.

[58]   Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. (1971) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally, Chicago.

[59]   Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988) On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.

[60]   Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, a Global Perspective. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 7th Edition.

[61]   Kennedy, P. (2003) A Guide to Econometrics. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[62]   Marquaridt, D.W. (1970) Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation. Technometrics, 12, 591-256.

[63]   Pan, Y. and Jackson, R.T. (2008) Ethnic Difference in the Relationship between Acute Inflammation and Serum Ferritin in US Adult Males. Epidemiology and Infection, 136, 421-431.

[64]   Rogerson, P.A. (2015) Statistical Methods for Geography a Student’s Guide. 4th Edition, Sage, Los Angeles.

[65]   Seyoum, B. (2013) Export-Import Theory, Practices, and Procedures. 2nd Edition, Routledge, New York.

[66]   Kaynak, E., Kucukemiroglu, O. and Hyder, A.S. (2000) Consumers’ Country-of-Origin (COO) Perceptions of Imported Products in a Homogenous Less-Developed Country. European Journal of Marketing, 34, 1221-1241.

[67]   Zhou, L. and Hui, M.K. (2003) Symbolic Value of Foreign Products in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of International Marketing, 11, 36-58.

[68]   Panopoulos, A.P. and Sarri, K. (2013) E-Mentoring: The Adoption Process and Innovation Challenge. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 217-226.

[69]   Niffenegger, P., White, J. and Marmet, G. (1982) How European Retailers View American Imported Products: Results of a Product Image Survey. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 10, 281-292.