OJMetal  Vol.7 No.2 , June 2017
Effect of Process Parameter Variation on Purity during Rotary Fractional Crystallization of Aluminum
ABSTRACT
High pure and ultrapure Aluminum is increasingly used in highly corrosion resistant applications or to replace copper in conductive parts such as high voltage cable and transformers due to their higher electrical conductivity properties. Ultrapure Aluminum is also used in semiconductors industry. Hence, the market demands innovative refining technologies, which consume less energy, take less time and lead to higher resource efficiencies. The most common methodology to produce ultrapure Aluminum is zone refining, based on the principle of fractional crystallization. Zone refining is however a very time-consuming process. In order to achieve a purity of 6N, several passes along the crucible with each full day treatment must be carried out. Also this method cannot be conducted continuously. This paper presents first time a new and eco-efficient method, which offers high potential to meet the mentioned multi-dimensional demands. Firstly, distribution coefficients of main impurities in Aluminum—a deciding factor to forecast and assess the removal behavior of impurities-were studied theoretically as a function of temperature using thermo-chemical calculation in FactSageTM. Secondly, the innovative method using a rotating and gas cooled crystallizer (“cooled finger”) was developed to validate the principle. The influencing process parameters such as temperature gradient, cooling gas flow rate, etc. were experimentally investigated and the theoretical results could be verified.
Cite this paper
Friedrich, S. , Coladetti Curtolo, D. and Friedrich, B. (2017) Effect of Process Parameter Variation on Purity during Rotary Fractional Crystallization of Aluminum. Open Journal of Metal, 7, 25-38. doi: 10.4236/ojmetal.2017.72003.
References
[1]   Scholz, R., Wangnick, K. and Ulrich, J. (1993) On the Distribution and Movement of Impurities in Crystalline Layers in Melt Crystallization Processes. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 26, B156-B161.

[2]   Trumbore, F.A., Isenberg, C.R. and Porbansky, E.M. (1958) On the Temperature-Dependence of the Distribution Coefficient: The Solid Solubilities of Tin in Silicon and Germanium. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 9, 60-69.

[3]   Pfann, W.G. (1962) Zone Melting: This Technique Offers Unique Advantages in Purification and in Control of Composition in Various Substances. Science, 135, 1101-1109.

[4]   Barthel, J., Buhirg, E., et al. (1982) Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie Leipzig. Kristallisation aus Schmelzen, 206-207.

[5]   Prostomolotov, A.I., Verezub, N.A. and Voloshin, A.E. (2014) Simplified Numerical Approach for Estimation of Effective Segregation Coefficient at the Melt/Crystal Interface. Journal of Crystal Growth, 401, 111-115.

[6]   Ulrich, J. and Glade, H. (2003) Melt Crystallization-Fundamentals, Equipment and Applications. Shaker.

[7]   Kurz, W. and Fisher, D.J. (1989) Fundamentals of Solidification. Trans Tech Publications Ltd., Aedermannsdorf.

[8]   Rudolph, P. and Nishinga, T. (2014) Handbook of Crystal Growth: Bulk Crystal Growth. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 389-397.

[9]   Hurle, D.T.J. (1961) Constitutional Supercooling during Crystal Growth from Stirred Melts—I: Theoretical. Solid-State Electronics, 3, 37-44.

[10]   Arai, K., Shingu, H., Sakaguchi, M., Nishide, T., Watanabe, O., Otsuka, R. and Tsukamoto, K. (1984) Process for Producing High-Purity Aluminum. US Patent No. 4469512.

[11]   Ostrogorsky, A.G. and Müller, G. (1992) A Model of Effective Segregation Coefficient, Accounting for Convection in the Solute Layer at the Growth Interface. Journal of Crystal Growth, 121, 587-598.

[12]   Hu, S., Nozawa, J., Koizumi, H., Fujiwara, K. and Uda, S. (2015) Grain Boundary Segregation of Impurities during Polycrystalline Colloidal Crystallization. Crystal Growth and Design, 15, 5685-5692.

 
 
Top