ME  Vol.2 No.3 , July 2011
Testing Validity of Using Sample Mean in Studies of Behavioral Facts
ABSTRACT
In this paper we argue that a couple of taken-for-granted methods employed in studying behavioral facts of human risk preference are mistakable. We call for within-subjects experiment design and propose a simple statistical method that might be used to test the validity of using sample mean in interpreting as well as generalizing risk preferences.

Cite this paper
nullY. Zou and R. Hu, "Testing Validity of Using Sample Mean in Studies of Behavioral Facts," Modern Economy, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2011, pp. 371-382. doi: 10.4236/me.2011.23040.
References
[1]   D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1979, pp. 263-292. doi:10.2307/1914185

[2]   T. Odean, “Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 5, 1998, pp. 1775-1798. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00072

[3]   R. H. Thaler and E. J. Johnson, “Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice,” Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 6, 1990, pp. 643-660. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643

[4]   R. H. Thaler, “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1985, pp. 199-214. doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

[5]   D. Kahneman and M. W. Riepe, “Aspects of Investor Psychology: Beliefs, Preferences, and Biases Investment Advisors Should Know about,” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1998, pp. 67-91.

[6]   S. J. Kachelmeier and M. Shehata, “Examining Risk Preferences under High Monetary Incentives: Experimental Evidence from the People’s Republic of China,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 82, No. 5, 1992, pp. 1120-1141.

[7]   A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, No. 5, 1992, pp. 297-323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574

[8]   B. M. Staw, “The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action,” Academy Management Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1981, pp. 577-587.

[9]   D. J. Laughhunn and J. W. Payne, “The Impact of Sunk Outcomes on Risky Choice Behavior,” INFOR, Vol. 22, 1984, pp. 151-181.

[10]   A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, New Series, Vol. 185, 1974, pp. 1124-1131.

[11]   S. Fredrick, “Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2005, pp. 25-42. doi:10.1257/089533005775196732

[12]   N. N. Taleb, “Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets,” October 2001, pp. 182-183.

[13]   G. M. Becker, DeGroot, H. Morris and, J. Marschak, “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method,” Behavioral Science, Vol. 9, 1964, pp. 226-232. doi:10.1002/bs.3830090304

[14]   R. W. Brislin, “Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 1, 1970, pp. 185-216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301

[15]   N. Etchart-Vincent and O. l’Haridon, “Monetary Incentives in the Loss Domain and Behavior toward Risk: An Experimental Comparison of Three Reward Schemes Including Real Losses,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, No. 42, 2011, pp. 61-83. doi:10.1007/s11166-010-9110-0

 
 
Top