PSYCH  Vol.2 No.4 , July 2011
The Predictive Effects of Online Communication on Well-Being among Chinese Adolescents
ABSTRACT
Based on theories and previous studies on online communication, we proposed two hypotheses to better under- stand the effects of online communication on subjective well-being with a sample of Chinese adolescents (n = 190). The results of liner regression analysis found that online communication was positively related to adoles- cents’ subjective well-being. For boys, the coefficient of determination of online communication on subjective well-being was .143, and for girls the coefficient of determination was .040, indicating that boys benefit more from online communication than do girls.
Cite this paper
nullWang, J. & Wang, H. (2011). The Predictive Effects of Online Communication on Well-Being among Chinese Adolescents. Psychology, 2, 359-362. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.24056.
References
[1]   Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 71-80. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00014-6

[2]   American Psychological Association (2001). Publication mannucal of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

[3]   Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00157

[4]   Bessière, K., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., & Boneva, B. S. (2008). Effects of Internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Communication, and Society, 11, 47-70. doi:10.1080/13691180701858851

[5]   Boneva, B., Quinn, A., Kraut, R. et al. (2006). Teenage communication in the instant messaging era. In Computers, phones, and the Internet: domesticating information technology (pp. 201-218). New York: Oxford University Press.

[6]   Carden, R., & Rettew, S. (2006). Internet chat room use, satisfaction with life, and loneliness. Psychological Reports, 98, 121-122. doi:10.2466/pr0.98.1.121-122

[7]   Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < 0.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997

[8]   Coleman, L. H., Paternite, C. E., & Sherman, R. C. (1999). A reexamination of deindividuation in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 51-65. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00032-6

[9]   Cooper, N. S. (2003). The identi?cation of psychological and social correlates of Internet use in children and teenagers. Ph. D. Thesis, Los Angeles, California: Alliant International University.

[10]   Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633-649. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.005

[11]   Gross, E., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75-90. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00249

[12]   Jackson, L. A., Von Eye, A., Barbatsis, G., Biocca, F., Fitzgerald, H. E., & Zhao, Y. (2004). The impact of Internet use on the other side of the digital divide. Communications of the ACM, 47, 43-47. doi:10.1145/1005817.1005819

[13]   Joinson, A. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192. doi:10.1002/ejsp.36

[14]   Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Syntopia: access, civic involvement, and social interaction on the Net. In C. Haythornthwaite and B. Wellman (Ed.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 114-138). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

[15]   Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00248

[16]   Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017

[17]   LaRose, S., Ghuay, F., & Boivin, M. (2002). Attachment, social support, and loneliness in young adulthood: A test of two models. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 684-693. doi:10.1177/0146167202288012

[18]   Mesch, G. (2001). Social relationships and Internet use among adolescents in Israel. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 329-339. doi:10.1111/0038-4941.00026

[19]   Mesch, G. (2003). The family and the Internet: The Israeli case. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 1050-1083. doi:10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404016.x

[20]   Morgan, C., & Cotten, S. R. (2003). The relationship between Internet activities and depressive symptoms in a sample of college freshmen. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6, 133-141. doi:10.1089/109493103321640329

[21]   Nie, N. H, Hillygus D. S, & Erbring L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability. In B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 215-243). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470774298.ch7

[22]   Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 420-435. doi:10.1177/00027640121957277

[23]   Rosenthal, R. (1995). Progress in clinical psychology: Is there any? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 133-149. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1995.tb00035.x

[24]   Sanders, C. E., Field, T. M., Diego, M., & Kaplan, M. (2000). The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation. Adolescence, 35, 237-242.

[25]   Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “Internet-attribute-perception” model. Media Psychology, 10, 292-314. doi:10.1080/15213260701375686

[26]   Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and well-being. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 3, 299-306. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0173

[27]   Schmidt, F. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1,115-129. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.115

[28]   Shaw, L. H., & Gant, L. M. (2002). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 157-170. doi:10.1089/109493102753770552

[29]   Shklovski, I., Kraut R, & Rainie L. (2004). The Internet and social participation: contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, Article 1.

[30]   Tidwell, L., & Walther, J. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x

[31]   Turke, S. (1995). Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.

[32]   Tuzg?l Dost, M. (2005). ?znel ?yi Oluú ?l?e÷i’nin geliútirilmesi: Ge?erlik ve güvenirlik ?al?úmas?. Türk Psikolojik Dan?úma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3, 103-109.

[33]   Tuzg?l-Dost, M. (2006). Subject?ve well-be?ng among un?vers?ty students. Hacettepe üniversitesi E÷itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 188-197.

[34]   Valkenburg, P. W., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1169-1182. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x

[35]   Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 18, 1-5.

[36]   Waestlund, E., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2001). Internet blues revisited: Replication and extension of an Internet paradox study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4, 385-391. doi:10.1089/109493101300210295

[37]   Weiser, E. B. (2001). The functions of Internet use and their psychological consequences. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4, 723-744. doi:10.1089/109493101753376678

 
 
Top