JBBS  Vol.5 No.9 , August 2015
New Issue to Modeling Intentionality in the Field of Consciousness
ABSTRACT
Brentano in 1870s was the first to introduce intentionality to mean “conscious of”. At the end of the 1960s, a version of this view was developed by analytic American philosophy to construct a theory of meaningful language. That led Dennett to claim that intentionality was mainly a feature of sentence, not mental states. In contrast, Searle in 1990s rejected the Brentanian thesis and explained intentionality by a biological naturalism. Thereafter, radical eliminativists such as Churchland claimed that all philosophical arguments merited replacement by neuroscientific knowledge. Unfortunately, very few neurophysiological studies attempted to scientifically tackle the problem raised by intentionality. The issue now emerging is a new conception of intentionality based on phenomenological, neurobiological and quantum theories, such as: 1) the notion of “intentional arc” proposed in the philosophy of Merleau-Ponty; 2) the neurobiological and quantum model of Freeman, in which self-organizing pathways are accompanied by quantum transitions in controlling intentionality in brain; 3) the recent hypothesis that some visuo-motor neurons would be involved in controlling these self-organized pathways; 4) the quantum models of Vitiello and Globus, in which a thermofield (dissipative) system governs the dynamic dialog of dual quantum modes between environment and brain. Based on this conception of mind-world interactions, it implicitly appears that intentionality might be a fundamental force which draws us irreversibly towards the future. An alternative hypothesis based on this promising proposal is argued.

Cite this paper
Blanquet, P. (2015) New Issue to Modeling Intentionality in the Field of Consciousness. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 5, 348-367. doi: 10.4236/jbbs.2015.59035.
References
[1]   Searle, J.R. (1980) The Intentionality of Intention in Action. Cognitive Science, 4, 47-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0401_3

[2]   Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963) The Structure of Behavior. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh.

[3]   Freeman, W. (2006) Origin, Structure and Role of Background EEG Activity. Part 4: Neural Frame Stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 572-589.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.025

[4]   Vitiello, G. (2004) The Dissipative Brain. In: Globus, G., Pribram, K. and Vitiello, G., Eds., Brain and Being: At the Boundary between Science, Philosophy, Language and Arts, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aicr.58.18vit

[5]   Vitiello, G. (2004) The Dissipative Brain.
http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio/0409037

[6]   Globus, G. (2006) Quantum Intentionality. NeuroQuantology, 4, 222-239.

[7]   Aquinas, S.T. (1952) Treatise on Man. In: Benton, W., Ed., The Summa Theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province), Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., Chicago.

[8]   Cahan, D. (1993) Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science. University of California Press, Berkeley,

[9]   Brentano, F. (1973) Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. Humanities Press, New York.

[10]   Husserl, E. (1960) Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. MacMillan, New York.

[11]   Macann, C.E. (1993) Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty. Routledge, New York.

[12]   Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and Time. Harper and Row, New York.

[13]   Heidegger, M. (1988) The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

[14]   Frege, G. (1997) On the Sense and Reference. In: Beaney, M., Ed., The Frege Reader, Penguin Press, London.

[15]   Russell, B. (1905) On Denoting. Mind, 14, 479-493.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479

[16]   Russell, B. (1984) Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript. In: Elizabeth, R., Ed., Eames and Kenneth Blackwell, Routledge, London.

[17]   Munitz, M.K. (1981) Contemporary Analytic Philosophies. MacMillan, New York.

[18]   Tye, M. (1995) Ten Problems of Consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[19]   Dretzke, F. (1995) Naturalizing the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[20]   Davies, M. (1997) Externalism and Experience. In: Block, N., Flanagan, O. and Güzeldere, G., Eds., The Nature of Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge.

[21]   Dennett, D. (1991) Consciousness Explained. Little, Brown and Company, Boston.

[22]   Dennett, D. (1995) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Simon & Schuster, New York.

[23]   Dennett, D. (1996) Finds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness. Basic Books, New York.

[24]   Ryle, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

[25]   Dennett, D. (1987) The Intentional Stance. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge.

[26]   Searle, J.R. (1995) Intentionality. In: Guttenplan, S., Ed., A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford and Cambridge.

[27]   Searle, J.R. (1998) Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. Basic Books, New York.

[28]   Churchland, P. (2011) Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality? Princeton University Press, Princeton.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400838080

[29]   Blanquet, P.R. (2011) Advances in Interdisciplinary Researches to Construct a Theory of Consciousness. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 1, 242-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2011.14031

[30]   Hameroff, S. and Penrose, R. (1996) Orchestrated Reduction of Quantum Coherence in Brain Microtubules: A Model for Consciousness. In: Hameroff, S.R. and Scott, A.C., Eds., Toward a Science of Consciousness, The First Tucson Discussion and Debates, MIT Press, Cambridge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4754(96)80476-9

[31]   Dehaene, S. and Naccache, L. (2000) Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Consciousness: Basic Evidence and a Workspace Framework. Cognition, 79, 1-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2

[32]   Edelman, G.M. (2004) Vaster Than the Sky: The Gift of Consciousness. Yale University Press, New Haven/London.

[33]   Luisi, P.L. (2003) Autopoiesis: Review and a Reappraisal. Naturwissenschaften, 90, 49-59.

[34]   Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4

[35]   Prinz, J.J. (2006) Beyond Appearances: The Content of Sensation and Perception. In: Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J., Eds., Perceptual Experience, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 434-460.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0013

[36]   De Rosa, R. (2005) Prinz’s Problematic Proxytypes. The Philosophical Quarterly, 55, 598-605.

[37]   Dewey, J. (1914) Psychological Doctrine in Philosophical Teaching. Journal of Philosophy, 11, 505-512.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2012791

[38]   Koffka, K. (1935) Principles of Gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.

[39]   Greeno, J.J. (1994) Gibson’s Affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 336-342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336

[40]   Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005) Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge Classics, New York and London.

[41]   Freeman, W. (1997) Nonlinear Neurodynamics of Intentionality. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 18, 291-304.

[42]   Freeman, W. (1999) Consciousness, Intentionality, and Causality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 143-172.

[43]   Freeman, W. (2004) Origin, Structure and Role of Background EEG Activity, Part 1: Analytic Amplitude. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2077-2088.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.029

[44]   Freeman, W. (2004) Origin, Structure and Role of Background EEG Activity. Part 2: Analytic Phase. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2089-2107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.028

[45]   Freeman, W. (2005) Origin, Structure and Role of Background EEG Activity, Part 3: Neural Frame Classification. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 1118-1129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.12.023

[46]   Freeman, W. and Vitiello, G. (2006) Nonlinear Brain Dynamics as Macroscopic Manifestation of Underlying Many-Body Field Dynamics. Physics of Life Reviews, 3, 93-118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2006.02.001

[47]   Freeman, W. and Vitiello, G. (2006) Exploration of Relations between Many-Body Field Theory and the Nonlinear Brain Dynamics That Underlies Cognitive Behavior (Lecture). World Conference on Computational Intelligence.

[48]   Vitielo, G. (1997) Dissipazione e coscienza. Atque, 16, 171-198.

[49]   Vitiello, G. (2001) My Double Unveiled. John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aicr.32

[50]   Vitiello, G. (2003) Quantum Dissipation and Information. NeuroQuantology, 1, 266-279.

[51]   Globus, G. (2003) Quantum Closures and Disclosures. John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aicr.50

[52]   Globus, G. (2004) Brain and Being. In: Globus, G., Pribram, K. and Vitiello, G., Eds., Advances in Consciousness Research, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aicr.58

[53]   Globus, G. (2005) The Being / Brain Problem. NeuroQuantology, 4, 256-263.

[54]   Globus, G. (2013) Bohr, Heidegger, the Unspeakable and Disclosure: An Exercise in Quantum Neurophilosophy. NeuroQuantology, 11, 171-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14704/nq.2013.11.2.665

[55]   McFadden, J. (2013) The CEMI Field Theory: Closing the Loop. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20, 153-168.

[56]   Pockett, S. (2012) The Electromagnetic Field Theory of Consciousness: A Testable Hypothesis about the Characteristics of Conscious as Opposed to Non-Conscious Fields. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19, 191-223.

[57]   Lohmann, K.J., Willows, A.O. and Pinter, R.B. (1991) An Identifiable Molluscan Neuron Responds to Changes in Earth-Strength Magnetic Fields. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 161, 1-24.

[58]   McFadden, J. (2007) Conscious Electromagnetic Field Theory. NeuroQuantology, 5, 262-270.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14704/nq.2007.5.3.135

[59]   McLennan, B.J. (1999) Field Computation in Natural and Artificial Intelligence. Information Sciences, 119, 73-89.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(99)00053-5

[60]   Bonini, L., Ferrari, P.F. and Fogassi, L. (2013) Neurophysiological Bases Underlying the Organization of Intentional Actions and the Understanding of Others Intention. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1095-1104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.001

[61]   Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S. (1982) Mind over Machine. Free Press, New York.

[62]   Dreyfus, H. and Hall, H. (1982) Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[63]   Dreyfus, H. (1997) The Current Relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Embodiment.
www.focuising.org/apm_papers/dreyfus2.html

[64]   Dreyfus, H. (2007) Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making It More Heideggerian. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 247-268.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515080701239510

[65]   Cohen-Tannoudji, G. and Spiro, M. (2013) Le boson et le chapeau mexicain. Eds Gallimard (folio essais), Paris.

[66]   Sciama, D.W. (1991) The Physical Significance of the Vacuum State of a Quantum Field. In: Saunders, S. and Brown, H.R., Eds., The Philosophy of Vacuum, Clarendon, Oxford, 137-158.

[67]   Ben, T. (2012) What’s So Special about Mirror Neurons. Scientific American, November 6.

[68]   Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. and Rizzolatti, G. (1992) Understanding Motor Events: A Neurophysiological Study. Experimental Brain Research, 9, 176-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00230027

[69]   Rizzolatti, G. and Sinigaglia, C. (2007) Mirror Neurons and Motor Intentionality. Functional Neurology, 22, 205-210.

[70]   Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. and Rizzolatti, G. (1996) Action Recognition in the Premotor Cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593

[71]   Altshuler, E.L., Vankov, A., Hubbard, E.M., Roberts, E., Ramachandran, V.S. and Pineda, J.A. (2000) Mu Wave Blocking by Observation of Movement and Its Possible Use as a Tool to Study Theory of Other Minds. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans, 4-9 November 2000, 68.

[72]   Cochin, S., Barthelemy, C., Lejeune, B., Roux, S. and Martineau, J. (1998) Perception of Motion and qEEG Activity in Human Adults. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 107, 287-295.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00071-6

[73]   Iacoboni, M., Woods, P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J.C. and Rizzolatti, G. (1999) Cortical Mechanisms of Human Imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5449.2526

[74]   Wiedermann, J. (2003) Coupling Perception with Actions via Mirror Neurons. Ercim News, Online Edition, No. 55.
www.ercim.eu/publication/Ercim News/enw55/wiedermann.html

[75]   Pietrobon, R. (2009) The Research on Research. Sussex Press, UK.

[76]   Hickok, G. (2009) Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1229-1243.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21189

[77]   Heyes, C.M. (2010) Where Do Mirror Neurons Come from? Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Review, 34, 575-583.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.007

[78]   Vannini, A. (2007) Quantum Models of Consciousness. Syntropy, 1, 130-146.

[79]   Von Neumann, J. (1955) Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

[80]   Wigner, E.P. (1967) Remarks on the Mind-Body Question in Symmetries and Reflections. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 171-184.

[81]   Stapp, H.P. (1993) A Quantum Theory of the Mind-Brain Interface, Mind Matter, and Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, 145-172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08765-7_6

[82]   Whitehead, A.N. (1979) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. In: Griffin, D.R. and Sherburne, D.W., Eds., Free Press, New York and London.

[83]   Stapp, H.P. (2006) Clarifications and Specifications in Conservation with Harald Atmanspacher. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13, 67-85.

[84]   Stapp, H.P. (2007) Mindful Universe. Springer, Berlin.

[85]   Ricciardi, L.M. and Umezawa, H. (1967) Brain and Physics of Many Body Problems. Biological Cybernetics, 4, 44-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00292170

[86]   Stapp, H.P. (1972) The Copenhagen Interpretation. American Journal of Physics, 40, 1098-1108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1986768

[87]   Vitiello, G. (1995) Dissipation and Memory Capacity in the Quantum Brain Model. International Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 973-989.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217979295000380

[88]   Nicolis, G. and Prigogine, I. (1989) A la rencontre du complexe. Presse Universitaire de France, Paris, 82-86.

[89]   Heidegger, M. (1999) Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning). Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

[90]   Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

[91]   Fisher, A.J. (2003) Quantum Computing in the Solid State: The Challenge of Decoherence. Philosophical Transaction: Mathematical Physical England Science, 361, 1441-1450.

[92]   Vimal, R.L.P. (2008) Proto-Experiences and Subjective Experiences: Classical and Quantum Concepts. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 7, 49-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219635208001757

[93]   Vimal, R.L.P. (2009) Dependent Co-Origination and Inherent Existence: Dual-Aspect Framework. Living Vision and Consciousness Research, Vision Research Institute.
http://sites.google.com/site/rlpvimal/home/Coorigination-Vimal-LVCR-2009-ιιι.pdf

[94]   Deleuze, G. (1968) Différence et répétition. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

[95]   Deleuze, G. (1985) L’Imagetemps. Editions de Minuit, Paris.

[96]   Badiou, A. (2013) Deleuze “La clameur de l’être”. Fayard/Pluriel, Paris.

[97]   Mugur-Schachter, M. (1997) Les lecons de la mécanique quantique: Vers une épistémologie formalisée. Le Débat, 94, 169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/deba.094.0169

[98]   Omnès, R. (1994) The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 250-251.

[99]   McCall, S., Whitaker, A. and George, G. (2001) Continuous vs. Discrete Processes: The Probabilistic Evolution of Single Trapped Ions. Proceedings of the 10th UK Conference on the Foundations of Physics, Belfast, 10-14 September 2001.

[100]   Rainio, K. (2009) Discrete Process Model for Quantum Systems of Matter and Mind. World Futures, 65, 270-303.

 
 
Top