NS  Vol.6 No.13 , August 2014
Preana: Game Theory Based Prediction with Reinforcement Learning
ABSTRACT

In this article, we have developed a game theory based prediction tool, named Preana, based on a promising model developed by Professor Bruce Beuno de Mesquita. The first part of this work is dedicated to exploration of the specifics of Mesquita’s algorithm and reproduction of the factors and features that have not been revealed in literature. In addition, we have developed a learning mechanism to model the players’ reasoning ability when it comes to taking risks. Preana can predict the outcome of any issue with multiple steak-holders who have conflicting interests in economic, business, and political sciences. We have utilized game theory, expected utility theory, Median voter theory, probability distribution and reinforcement learning. We were able to reproduce Mesquita’s reported results and have included two case studies from his publications and compared his results to that of Preana. We have also applied Preana on Irans 2013 presidential election to verify the accuracy of the prediction made by Preana.


Cite this paper
Eftekhari, Z. and Rahimi, S. (2014) Preana: Game Theory Based Prediction with Reinforcement Learning. Natural Science, 6, 1108-1121. doi: 10.4236/ns.2014.613099.
References
[1]   de Mesquita, B.B. (2011) A New Model for Predicting Policy Choices: Preliminary Tests. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 28, 65-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0738894210388127

[2]   Feder, S.A. (1995) FACTIONS and Policon: New Ways to Analyze Politics. In: Westerfield, H.B. (Ed.), Inside CIA’s Private World: Declassified Articles from the Agency’s Internal Journal, Yale University Press, Yale, CT, 274-292.

[3]   Scholz, J.B., Calbert, G.J. and Smith, G.A. (2011) Unravelling Bueno De Mesquita’s Group Decision Model. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 23, 510-531.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0951629811418142

[4]   Ueng, B. (2012) Applying Bruce Bueno de Mesquita’s Group Decision Model to Taiwan’s Political Status: A Simplified Model. The Visible Hand: A Cornell Economics Society Publication, Ithaca, NY.

[5]   de Mesquita, B.B. (1997) A Decision Making Model: Its Structure and Form. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations, 23, 235-266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050629708434909

[6]   Black, D. (1948) On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 23-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/256633

[7]   Banks, J.S. (1990) Equilibrium Behavior in Crisis Bargaining Games. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 599-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111390

[8]   Holcombe, R.G. (2006) Public Sector Economics. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 155.

[9]   De Mesquita, B.B. (1985) The War Trap Revisited: A Revised Expected Utility Model. American Political Science Review, 79, 156-177.

[10]   De Mesquita, B.B. and Lalman, D. (1986) Reason and War. American Political Science Review, 80, 1113-1129.

[11]   De Mesquita, B.B. (2009) A New Model for Predicting Policy Choices: Preliminary Tests. 50th Meeting of the International Studies Association, New York, 15-18 February 2009, 36p.

[12]   De Mesquita, B.B. (1994) Political Forecasting: An Expected Utility Method. In: Stockman, F., Ed., European Community Decision Making, Yale University Press, Yale, Chapter 4, 71-104.

[13]   Lamborn, A. (1991) The Price of Power. Unwin Hyman, Boston.

[14]   Watkins, C.J.C.H. (1989) Learning from Delayed Rewards. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, England.

[15]   Hassan Rouhani Wins Iran Presidential Election BBC News, 15 June 2013.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-22916174

 
 
Top