OJSST  Vol.4 No.2 , June 2014
Design of an Intelligent Tool for the Observation and Follow-Up of Lockout Procedures during Maintenance Activities on Industrial Machines
Workers performing maintenance, repair and un-jamming operations on industrial machines and processes are required to follow lockout procedures in accordance with occupational health and safety regulations. However, industries seem to have difficulties in the appropriation and implementation of lockout. Reports of severe accidents, often fatal, involving industrial machinery show the extent of the problem concerning the application of lockout procedures. In this context, an intelligent tool incorporated at the design stage of a machine, which helps to apply and record lockout procedures, could be useful. Thereby, the design of a laboratory prototype has been explored for a particular maintenance task on an automated plastic injection moulding machine. Its architecture has been based on three electronic cards, sensors and wireless communications. Despite the limitations of the current version of the tool, the feasibility of designing an intelligent tool capable of following and recording lockout procedures is demonstrated.

Cite this paper
Burlet-Vienney, D. , Chinniah, Y. and Pizarro-Chong, A. (2014) Design of an Intelligent Tool for the Observation and Follow-Up of Lockout Procedures during Maintenance Activities on Industrial Machines. Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 4, 106-118. doi: 10.4236/ojsst.2014.42012.
[1]   Occupational Health and Safety Administration (1989) OSHA 1910.147—Regulations Standards—29 CFR, The Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout).

[2]   Quebec Government (2014) Regulation Respecting Occupational Health and Safety (c. S-2.1, s.223).

[3]   The European Parliament and of the Council (2006) Directive 2006/42/CE on Machinery.

[4]   International Standard Organization (2010) Safety of Machinery—General Principles for Design—Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction (ISO 12100:2010). The Organization, Geneva.

[5]   Bulzachelli, M.T., Vernick, J.S., Sorock, G.S., Webster, D.W. and Lees, P.S.J. (2008) Circumstances of Fatal Lockout/Tagout Related Injuries in Manufacturing. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 51, 728-734.

[6]   Chinniah, Y. and Burlet-Vienney, D. (2013) Study on Lockout Procedures for the Safety of Workers Intervening on Equipment in the Municipal Sector in Québec. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 19, 495-411.

[7]   Blaise, J.-C. and Welitz, G. (2010) Operating on Machinery out of Production Modes: Principles and Accidentology. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Safety of Industrial Automated Systems—SIAS 2010, Tampere, 14-15 June 2010.

[8]   Shaw, S. (2010) Machinery Accidents—Contributory Factors. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Safety of Industrial Automated Systems—SIAS 2010, Tampere, 14-15 June 2010.

[9]   US Department of Labor Statistics (2007) Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. Archived Data—Fatality Rates (Employment-Based) 1992-2007. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoiarchive.htm#rates

[10]   Bulzachelli, M.T., Vernick, J.S., Webster, W. and Lees P.S.J. (2007) Effects of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) Standard on Rates of Machinery-Related Fatal Occupational Injury. Injury prevention, 13, 334-338.

[11]   Kelley, S. (2001) LockOutTagOut: A Practical Approach. The American Society of Safety Engineers, Des Plaines.

[12]   American National Standard Institute/American Society of Safety Engineers (2003) Control of Hazardous Energy, Lockout/Tagout and Alternative Methods (ANSI/ASSE Z244). The American Society of Safety Engineers, Des Plaines.

[13]   Canadian Standards Association (2013) Control of Hazardous Energy: Lockout and Other Methods (CSA Z460-13). The Association, Mississauga.

[14]   Chinniah, Y. (2010) Equipment Lockout—A Review of Written Lockout Programs in Quebec. Professional Safety, 55, 38-43.

[15]   Burlet-Vienney, D., Jocelyn, S., Chinniah, Y., Daigle, R. and Massé, S. (2009) Verifying the Content of Lockout Programs. http://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/PubIRSST/RF-635.pdf

[16]   Chinniah, Y., Paques, J.-J. and Champoux, M. (2007) Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction: A Machine Safety Case Study from Quebec. Professional Safety, 52, 49-56.

[17]   Canadian Standards Association (2004) Safeguarding of Machinery (CSA Z432-04). The Association, Mississauga.

[18]   International Electrotechnical Commission (2010) Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems—Part 2: Requirements for Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems (IEC 61508-2). The Commission, Geneva.

[19]   International Electrotechnical Commission (2005) Safety of Machinery—Functional Safety of Safety-Related Electrical, Electronic and Programmable Electronic Control Systems (IEC 62061). The Commission, Geneva.

[20]   International Standard Organization (2006) Safety of Machinery—Safety-Related Parts of Control Systems—Part 1: General Principles for Design (ISO 13849-1:2006). The Commission, Geneva.

[21]   American National Standard Institute/ American Society of Safety Engineers (2011) Prevention through Design: Guidelines for Addressing Occupational Hazards and Risks in Design and Redesign Processes (ANSI/ASSE Z590.3). The American Society of Safety Engineers, Des Plaines.

[22]   Manuele, F.A. (2008) Prevention through Design. Professional Safety, 53, 28-40.