OJU  Vol.4 No.4 , April 2014
Wireless Capsule Cystoscopy: How Near? How Far?
Author(s) Hakan Öztürk
ABSTRACT

It is a fact that performing endoscopy using conventional methods requires substantial time and development of alternative diagnostic modalities. Replacement of rigid endoscopes with flexible and digital devices in time, faster performance of the procedures and reduced time for them to turn back to work brought about the expectancy. It was possible that easier and more reliable methods could exist. Idea of capsule endoscopy was born following examination of the gastrointestinal tract with an endoscope with shape of a capsule. Although idea of capsule endoscopy was suggested long years ago, it fell behind the advances in conventional step of the endoscopy, especially developmental speed of the flexible devices. Furthermore, three-dimensional (3D) organ views can be processed digitally by means of sophisticated software in the fields of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Thus, virtual cystoscopy of high resolution and specificity is possible by means of both methods. Wireless capsule endoscopy is still in the experimental stage. “Steerable independent intracorporeal endoscope” with feature of consecutive instillation in addition to its diagnostic utility is not a dream.


Cite this paper
Öztürk, H. (2014) Wireless Capsule Cystoscopy: How Near? How Far?. Open Journal of Urology, 4, 37-40. doi: 10.4236/oju.2014.44007.
References
[1]   Verger-Kuhnke, A.B., Reuter, M.A. and Beccaria, M.L. (2007) Biography of Phillip Bozzini (1773-1809) an Idealist of the Endoscopy. Actas Urológicas Espanolas, 31, 437-444.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0210-4806(07)73666-5

[2]   Natalin, R.A. and Landman, J. (2009) Where Next for the Endoscope? Nature Reviews Urology, 6, 622-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2009.199

[3]   Babjuk, M., Oosterlinck, W., Sylvester, R., Kaasinen, E., B?hle, A. and Palou-Redorta, J. (2008) EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. European Urology, 54, 303-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.051

[4]   Lopes, R.I., Nogueira, L., Albertotti, C.J., Takahashi, D.Y. and Lopes, R.N. (2008) Comparison of Virtual Cystoscopy and Transabdominal Ultrasonography with Conventional Cystoscopy for Bladder Tumor Detection. Journal of Endourology, 22, 1725-1729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0363

[5]   Panebianco, V., Sciarra, A., DiMartino, M., Bernardo, S., Vergari, V., Gentilucci, A., Catalano, C. and Passariello, R. (2010) Bladder Carcinoma: MDCT Cystography and Virtual Cystoscopy. Abdom Imaging, 35, 257-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9530-y

[6]   Beer, A., Saar, B., Zantl, N., Link, T.M., Roggel, R., Hwang, S.L, Schwaibold, H. and Rummeny, E.J. (2004) MR Cystography for Bladder Tumor Detection. European Radiology, 14, 2311-2319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2451-9

[7]   Ciudin, A., Diaconu, M.G., Gosalbez, D., Peri, L., Garcia-Cruz, E., Franco, A. and Alcaraz, A. (2013) Air Cystoscopy Is Superior toWater Cystoscopy for the Diagnosis of Active Hematuria. The Journal of Urology, 190, 2097-2101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.040

[8]   Koulaouzidis, A., Rondonotti, E. and Karargyris, A. (2013) Small-Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Ten-Point Contemporary Review. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 19, 3726-3746.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3726

[9]   Gettman, M.T. and Swain, P. (2009) Initial Experimental Evaluation of Wireless Capsule Endoscopes in the Bladder: Implications for Capsule Cystoscopy. European Urology, 55, 1207-1212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.047

[10]   Neheman, A., Schulman, C. and Yossepowitch, O. (2013) Novel Anti-Biofilm Mechanism for Wireless Capsule Endoscopy in the Urinary Tract: Preliminary Study in a Sheep Model. BJU International, 111, 1156-1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12040

 
 
Top