OJST  Vol.2 No.3 , September 2012
5-year audit of the range and volume of diagnostic radiographic services at the University of Nairobi Dental Hospital
Background: Dental and cranio-maxillofacial diagnostic imaging constitutes an invaluable tool in the accurate diagnosis and management of a diverse range of conditions and diseases that afflict the oral and cranio-maxillofacial region. In order to improve on any existing facility, periodic audit evaluation is paramount. In this way proper and relevant service delivery can be achieved. Objective: To evaluate the range and volume of dental and cranio-maxillofacial diagnostic radiographic services offered at the University of Nairobi Dental Hospital (UNDH) in Kenya over a 5-year period (2006-2010). Methods: Retro-spective survey involving manual examination of patient records at the Division of Dental and cra-nio-maxillofacial Radiology registry of the UNDH. Results: Over the study period, the range of diagnostic radiographic services offered comprised of both intra- and extra- oral examinations. The total volume of radiographs taken was 48,874 among which 41,980 (86%) were intraoral and 6894 (14%) extraoral views. Among the intraoral views, 74% were bitewing, 25% periapical and only 1% were occlusal diagnostic views. The majority (95%) of the extraoral projections consisted of panoramic views and only 5% constituted other techniques. The volume of radiographs was high from January to September while November and December had the lowest number of examination requests. Conclusion: Intraoral radiography was the commonest examination with bitewings having been the majority while the panoramic tomography was the commonest extraoral examination performed.
Cite this paper
Kihara, E. , Opondo, F. , Ocholla, T. , Chindia, M. and Wagaiyu, E. (2012) 5-year audit of the range and volume of diagnostic radiographic services at the University of Nairobi Dental Hospital. Open Journal of Stomatology, 2, 234-236. doi: 10.4236/ojst.2012.23041.
[1]   Whaites, E. (1996) Essentials of dental radiography and radiology. Churchill Livingstone, London.

[2]   Umarji, H.R. (2008) Concise oral radiology. Satish kumar Jain, CBS Publishers, New Delhi.

[3]   White, S.C. and Pharoah, M.J. (2004) Imaging principles and techniques. In: Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation, 5th Edition. Mosby Company, St. Louis, 69- 264.

[4]   Sikri, V.K. (2006) Fundamentals of dental radiology. 3rd Edition, Satish kumar Jain, CBS Publishers, New Delhi.

[5]   Pendlebury, M.E., Horner, K. and Eaton, K.A. (2004) Selection criteria for dental radiography. 2nd Edition, Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK) Royal College of Surgeons of England, London.

[6]   Wenzel, A. and Gotfredsen, E. (2005) Audit for extraoral radiographic examination in digital department. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 34, 228-230. doi:10.1259/dmfr/63732554

[7]   Scarfe, W.C. (2005) Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: Evolutions and emerging revolutions. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, 100, S75-S96.

[8]   Boeddinghaus, R. and Whyte, A. (2008) Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. European Journal of Radiology, 66, 396-418. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.019

[9]   Kaeppler, G. (2010) Applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental and oral medicine. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 13, 203-219.

[10]   De Vos, W., Casselman, J. and Swennen, G.R.J. (2009) Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systemic review of the literature. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 38, 609-625. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028