ABSTRACT A relation between the intervals of energy and time, derived in a former paper and associated with the electron transitions on the Fermi surface of a metal, is examined in comparison with the experimental data. These data are obtained from the de-excitation process of electrons in metals. A comparison between theory and experiment demonstrated that the new relation between energy and time is fitted much better for the experimental results than the well-known relation due to the Heisenberg theory.
Cite this paper
S. Olszewski, "Relation between the Intervals ΔE and Δt Obtained in the De-Excitation Process of Electrons in Metals," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2012, pp. 217-220. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2012.33030.
 W. Heisenberg, “Ueber den Anschaulichen Inhalt der Quan- tentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,” Zeitschrift fuer Physik, Vol. 43, No. 3-4, 1927, pp. 172-198.
 L. I. Schiff, “Quantum Mechanics,” 3rd Edition, McGraw- Hill, New York, 1968.
 L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, “Quantum Mechanics,” Pergamon, Oxford, 1965.
 M. Jammer, “The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics,” Wiley, New York, 1974.
 W. Schommers, “Space-Time and Quantum Phenomena,” In: W. Schommers, Ed., Quantum Theory and Pictures of Reality Springer, Berlin, 1989, pp. 217-277.
 S. Olszewski, “Magnetic Field Induction and Time Inter- vals of the Electron Transitions Approached on a Classi- cal and Quantum-Mechanical Way,” Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 2, No. 11, 2011, pp. 1305-1309.
 P. J. Vernier, “Photoemission,” In: E. Wolf, Ed., Progress in Optics, Vol. 14, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976, pp. 245-325.
 N. V. Smith and G. B. Fischer, “Photoemission Studies of the Alkali Metals. II. Rubidium and Caesium,” Physical Review B, Vol. 3, No. 11, 1971, pp. 3662-3670.
 N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, “Solid State Physics,” Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1976.