NR  Vol.3 No.1 , March 2012
Comparison of Design and Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dam
ABSTRACT
Gravity dams are solid concrete structures that maintain their stability against design loads from the geometric shape, mass and strength of the concrete. The purposes of dam construction may include navigation, flood damage reduction, hydroelectric power generation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality, water supply, and recreation. The design and evaluation of concrete gravity dam for earthquake loading must be based on appropriate criteria that reflect both the desired level of safety and the choice of the design and evaluation procedures. In Bangladesh, the entire country is divided into 3 seismic zones, depending upon the severity of the earthquake intensity. Thus, the main aim of this study is to design high concrete gravity dams based on the U.S.B.R. recommendations in seismic zone II of Bangladesh, for varying horizontal earthquake intensities from 0.10 g - 0.30 g with 0.05 g increment to take into account the uncertainty and severity of earthquake intensities and constant other design loads, and to analyze its stability and stress conditions using analytical 2D gravity method and finite element method. The results of the horizontal earthquake intensity perturbation suggest that the stabilizing moments are found to decrease significantly with the increment of horizontal earthquake intensity while dealing with the U.S.B.R. recommended initial dam section, indicating endanger to the dam stability, thus larger dam section is provided to increase the stabilizing moments and to make it safe against failure. The vertical, principal and shear stresses obtained using ANSYS 5.4 analyses are compared with those obtained using 2D gravity method and found less compares to 2D gravity method, except the principal stresses at the toe of the gravity dam for 0.10 g - 0.15 g. Although, it seems apparently that smaller dam section may be sufficient for stress analyses using ANSYS 5.4, it would not be possible to achieve the required factors of safety with smaller dam section. It is observed during stability analyses that the factor of safety against sliding is satisfied at last than other factors of safety, resulting huge dam section to make it safe against sliding. Thus, it can be concluded that it would not be feasible to construct a concrete gravity dam for horizontal earthquake intensity greater than 0.30 g without changing other loads and or dimension of the dam and keeping provision for drainage gallery to reduce the uplift pressure significantly.

Cite this paper
M. Ali, M. Alam, M. Haque and M. Alam, "Comparison of Design and Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dam," Natural Resources, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2012, pp. 18-28. doi: 10.4236/nr.2012.31004.
References
[1]   M. F. Kennard, C. C. Owens and R. A. Reader, “An Engineering Guide to the Safety of Concrete and Masonry Dams in the UK,” Report 148, CIRIA, 1995.

[2]   N. Smith, “A History of Dams,” Peter Davies, London, 1971.

[3]   A. Vogel, “The Historical Development of the Gravity Dam,” In: H. Fahlbusch, Ed., Historical Dams, International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, New Delhi, 2001, pp. 61-70.

[4]   A. K. Biswas and S. Chatterju, “Dam Disasters: An Assessment,” J. Eng. Inst. Can., Vol. 54, No. 3, 1971.

[5]   G. B. Baecher, M. E. Gregory and R. de Neufville, “Risk of Dam Failure in Benefit-Cost Analysis,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1980, pp. 449-456.

[6]   Bureau of Reclamation, “U.S. Department of the Interior Design of Small Dams,” 1977.

[7]   S. K. Garg, “Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulic Structures,” 16th Edition, Khanna Publishers, Delhi, 2002, pp. 960-1020.

[8]   “Bangladesh National Building Code,” 1993.

[9]   C. N. Zangar, “Hydrodynamic Pressures on Dams Due to Horizontal Earthquake Effects,” Engineering Monograph, No. 11, Bureau of Reclamation, 1952.

[10]   C. V. Davis, “Handbook of Applied Hydraulics,” McGraw-Hill, Basingstoke, 1969.

[11]   G. Oberti, “The Interconnection between Concrete Dam and Foundations,” ICOLD, XVII Congress, Q. 66, R. 42, Vienna, 1991.

[12]   L. R. Volpe, S. C. Ahlgren and E. R. Goodman, “Selection of Engineering Properties for Geologically Variable Foundations,” ICOLD, XVII Congress, Q. 66, R. 59, Vienna, 1991.

[13]   G. Winter, L. C. Urquhart, C. E. O’Rourke and A. H. Nilson, “Design of Concrete Structures,” 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill Inc., Boston, 1964, p. 660.

 
 
Top