NS  Vol.2 No.2 , February 2010
A longitudinal study of the professional dispositions of teacher candidates
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to examine the professional disposition scores of Physical Education teacher candidates over time. In ad-dition, differences between teacher and student ratings were investigated. Participants were 65 students who completed three methods courses (A, B, and C) across a two-year period. Both the teacher and the students completed a profes-sional dispositions instrument in each of the three classes. Results indicated a decrease in disposition self ratings and teacher ratings over time. A 2 (Rater) x 3 (Time) ANOVA revealed that the student and teacher ratings were different for classes A and B but not for class C. The findings are encouraging in light of the strong alignment between teacher and student ratings in the upper-level class. The dispositions in-strument appears to be a valid and reliable method to assess the professional behaviors of teacher candidates.

Cite this paper
Ignico, A. and Gammon, K. (2010) A longitudinal study of the professional dispositions of teacher candidates. Natural Science, 2, 91-94. doi: 10.4236/ns.2010.22014.
References
[1]   Freese, A.R. (2006). Reframing one’s teaching: Discov-ering our teacher selves through reflection and inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 100-119.

[2]   Whaley, D.C. (1999). Assessing the disposition of teacher education candidates. Teacher preparation as-sessment: The hows and whys of new standards. Amherst, MA: National Evaluation Systems, Inc.

[3]   Ashton, P.R. (1996). Improving the preparation of teach-ers. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 21-35.

[4]   Tjeerdsma, B.L., Metzler, M.W., Walker, T.M. and Mozen, D. (2000). Assessing dispositions. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 451-475.

[5]   Young, L.J. and Youngs, D.C. (2005). Exploring disposi-tions in student teaching and field experience. In R.L. Smith, D. Skarbek & J. Hurst (Eds.), The passion of teaching: Dispositions in the schools (pp. 135-152). Lanham, MD: Scarecroweducation.

[6]   McKnight, D. (2004). An inquiry of NCATE’s move into virtue ethics by way of disposition (Is this what Aristotle meant?). Educational Studies Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 35(3), 212-230.

[7]   Wayda, V. and Lund, J. (2005). Assessing dispositions: An unresolved challenge in teacher education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 76(1), 34-41.

[8]   Mitchell, A. (2000). NCATE 2000: Teacher education and performance-based reform. Washington, D.C.: Na-tional Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.

 
 
Top